Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

St Andrew's CofE Methodist (Aided) Primary School

Inspected 24 Jun 2008 · published 15 Jul 2008 · URN 112913

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Mike Best

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    24 Jun 2008

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mike Best

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    S18 8ZQ

  • Name on report verified

    St Andrew's Church of England Methodist (Aided) Primary School

  • URN verified

    112913

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+53Positivemore positive than 47% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyeffectiveexceptionallyenjoyvery wellpositivewarmproud
Criticismnot alwaysinadequatebelownot consistentlyinconsistenciesdisruptioninconsistentlacks

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1855w+66
  • What needs to improve925w+25

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,745
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 67%What needs to improve 33%About the inspection 0%

Full report text

St Andrew's Church of England Methodist (Aided) Primary School Inspection report

p.1

112913 Unique Reference Number Derbyshire Local Authority 311049 Inspection number 23 °24 June 2008 Inspection dates Mike Best Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary Type of school Voluntary aided School category 4 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 203 School The governing body Appropriate authority Rev Jonathan Haigh Chair Mr John Clapham Headteacher 29 March 2004 Date of previous school inspection Pentland Road School address Dronfield Woodhouse Derbyshire S18 8ZQ 01246 417243 Telephone number 01246 417243 Fax number

p.1

4-11 Age group 23 °24 June 2008 Inspection dates 311049 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

The school is similar in size to most other primary schools. Most pupils come from the local area and are from predominantly White British backgrounds. The proportion of pupils eligible for free school meals is well below average. When they start in Reception, children's skills and experiences are above those expected for their age. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is much lower than average, although the proportion of pupils with statements outlining their needs is average. The school has been awarded the Arts Mark Gold for its creative curriculum and holds the Active Mark for pupils' participation in physical activities. The present headteacher took up his appointment in September 2007.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 11 Inspection Report: St Andrew's Church of England Methodist (Aided) Primary School, 23 °24 June 2008

p.3

Grade: 3

St Andrew's provides a satisfactory education and this confirms the school's evaluation. This is an improving school which, under the strong and purposeful leadership of the new headteacher, is successfully addressing the legacy of underachievement since the time of the last inspection. Recognising this, parents, in their responses to the inspection questionnaire, express confidence in the school. Standards at the end of Year 6 are above average and achievement is now satisfactory. Pupils make sound progress as they move through the school, though this is not consistent from year to year. There are two contributory factors. Firstly, the school does not have an agreed programme for systematically developing pupils' skills. Secondly, teachers' expectations of what pupils can do are not well-enough informed because, until recently, they did not have access to the whole range of information available about pupils' standards and progress. These

p.4

Grade: 3

factors have contributed to boys not performing as well as girls because teaching methods have not always suited their learning needs. Pupils, particularly the more able, are not consistently challenged by their work. The curriculum is satisfactory. Teachers link different subjects in ways that add relevance and enjoyment to pupils' learning. However, planning does not identify sufficiently the skills required to help pupils make the best progress, either in individual subjects or in such areas as independent research, enquiry and problem-solving. The range of extra-curricular activities is good and these are popular with pupils. Personal, social and health education is effectively organised and contributes well to the development of pupils' self-esteem and confidence. Pupils enjoy school and have positive attitudes to learning, shown through their confident participation in lessons and good attendance. They feel very safe in school and have a good

p.4

Grade: 3

awareness of how to stay healthy. Pupils take an active part in decision-making and make a good contribution to the wider community through fundraising. Their preparation for the next stage of their education and the world of work is satisfactory; it is no better because pupils do not systematically develop the range of skills that match their capabilities. The school cares well for its pupils and the pastoral support for them is good. As a pupil said, 'You feel warm when you come into school as everyone checks you are alright'. Academic guidance has improved recently and is now satisfactory overall. Although there are instances where assessment, target-setting and marking are effective, inconsistencies across the school are preventing pupils from making better progress. The headteacher has rapidly identified the most important priorities facing the school. He has won the respect and trust of pupils, parents, staff and governors for the way in which he is

p.4

Grade: 3

involving them in bringing about changes and supporting improvement. Leadership roles and responsibilities are still to be fully agreed and developed so that staff can take more responsibility for identifying needs and piloting through planned improvements. The governing body is actively involved and is developing its role as the school's critical friend. Taking into account the recent improvements, the school has made sound progress since the last inspection. It gives satisfactory value for money and has a satisfactory capacity for further improvement. 4 of 11 Inspection Report: St Andrew's Church of England Methodist (Aided) Primary School, 23 °24 June 2008

p.4

Grade: 3

When they start in the Reception class, most children's skills and experiences are above those expected for their ages. By the time they start in Year 1, they reach above average standards in each area of learning. Although girls perform ahead of boys, the recent emphasis on developing boys' personal and social skills has helped to close the gap. Children enjoy school and listen attentively. They are keen to answer questions, they take turns and speak with confidence. They take responsibility for getting changed for outdoor games and for tidying away resources. Trusting relationships between staff and children underlie children's good behaviour and positive response to teaching. Staff make detailed observations of children's participation in learning and use this information to inform the next steps in learning. However, not enough emphasis is placed on children making choices and taking responsibility for their

p.5

Grade: 3

own learning, particularly in outside activities. Learning resources are of good quality but the layout of the accommodation makes it difficult for children to move freely between the indoor and outdoor areas.

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

■ Raise levels of achievement by ensuring the systematic development of skills within the curriculum, particularly for the more able. ■ Make better use of assessment data, target-setting, marking and feedback procedures to increase the rate of pupils' progress. ■ Ensure that leaders and managers at all levels clearly direct improvement through accurate self-evaluation and forward planning. A small proportion of the schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory but which have areas of underperformance will receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.

p.5

Grade: 3

Standards at the end of Year 2 are above average in reading and mathematics, and well above average in writing. Over the past five years, standards have ranged from average to well above average. In mathematics, standards have risen this year because pupils' skills in using and applying mathematics have been a focus for improvement. At the end of Year 6, standards are above average in English and mathematics, and average in science. Over the past five years, the school's results have not improved as fast as those nationally, particularly in science. In both 2006 and 2007, a significant proportion of pupils had not made the progress expected of them by the end of Year 6. This was particularly evident in science and in boys' writing. The recent emphasis on developing writing skills and pupils' investigative and enquiry skills in science has helped to improve achievement to satisfactory in the current Year 6. Pupils with special educational needs made sound progress towards the

p.5

Grade: 3

targets in their individual education plans. 5 of 11 Inspection Report: St Andrew's Church of England Methodist (Aided) Primary School, 23 °24 June 2008

p.5

Grade: 2

Pupils' spiritual, moral and social development is good and this is reflected in the respectful, secure, family atmosphere that is evident throughout the school. Pupils' understanding of their own culture is good, but they have only a limited appreciation of the richness of other cultures in modern Britain. Pupils generally behave very well and they treat each other with good manners. They frequently assume responsibilities, for example when organising assemblies and when older pupils act as reading buddies to Reception children. This promotes their self-esteem well and gives them an early understanding of the importance of citizenship. Pupils participate keenly in sporting activities and are proud to represent the school in team games.

p.6

Grade: 3

Teaching in individual lessons often has good features. These include the constructive relationships between adults and pupils, the quality of the support given by teaching assistants and volunteers and pupils' willingness to answer questions and consider each other's ideas and suggestions. In addition, parents give their children valuable help and support. However, although some teachers ensure pupils' progressive development of skills by matching work well to their individual needs, this is not consistent throughout the school. Where there is good practice, pupils focus on their learning and make good progress. Elsewhere, however, more able pupils have to complete the work set for all pupils before moving onto extension tasks; these pupils are consequently not being stretched and they sometimes become distracted, leading to some low-level disruption.

p.6

Grade: 3

Regular visitors to school and visits to places of interest broaden pupils' horizons and help them appreciate the wider world. Such activities enrich an otherwise satisfactory curriculum. The needs of pupils with learning difficulties are satisfactorily addressed but the provision for more able pupils remains inconsistent. The recent focus on English development is having a beneficial impact on boys' writing, particularly in Key Stage 2, as more opportunities are being provided to extend their skills across the curriculum.

p.6

Grade: 3

Effective systems safeguard pupils' welfare and promote their personal development and well-being. Staff know their pupils well and react quickly and sensitively to issues that may arise. Partnerships with external agencies are effective, ensuring appropriate support is given to pupils with learning difficulties. More use is now being made of assessment information to set improvement targets for pupils. Tracking systems are developing and pupils are beginning to understand what they need to do to improve their work in English and mathematics. However, these are not yet established practice throughout the school. 6 of 11 Inspection Report: St Andrew's Church of England Methodist (Aided) Primary School, 23 °24 June 2008

p.6

Grade: 3

Staff and governors enthusiastically share the headteacher's vision for the development of the school and are working effectively with him to realise this. Staff are developing a greater understanding of how the school is performing compared with others and how they can bring about improvement. Although the school's current self-evaluation lacks in-depth analysis is some areas, it represents the shared view of staff and governors. With the headteacher's guidance, the development plan emphasises improving pupils' achievement and the quality of provision and highlights the most important priorities facing the school. It provides challenging but achievable targets that are appropriately funded and has clear criteria for judging success. The governing body is supportive of the school. Governors are benefiting from the training provided by the local authority, particularly in developing their understanding of the data

p.7

Grade: 3

available about pupils' standards and progress. This is enabling them to hold the school to account more effectively. 7 of 11 Inspection Report: St Andrew's Church of England Methodist (Aided) Primary School, 23 °24 June 2008 .

p.7

Grade: 3

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 8 of 11 Inspection Report: St Andrew's Church of England Methodist (Aided) Primary School, 23 °24 June 2008

p.8

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 3 The effectiveness of the Foundation Stage 3 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.9

Achievement and standards

3 How well do learners achieve? 2 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The attendance of learners 2 The behaviour of learners 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

and interests of learners?

3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 9 of 11 Inspection Report: St Andrew's Church of England Methodist (Aided) Primary School, 23 °24 June 2008

p.9

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 3 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 10 of 11 Inspection Report: St Andrew's Church of England Methodist (Aided) Primary School, 23 °24 June 2008

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

25 June 2008 Dear Pupils Inspection of St Andrew's Church of England Methodist (Aided) Primary School, Dronfield Woodhouse, S18 8ZQ Thank you very much for making us welcome when we visited your school earlier this week. You are rightly proud of the warm and friendly atmosphere in the school and we much appreciated the help and kindness you gave us. You enjoy school, attend regularly and behave very well. You also have a good understanding of how to keep safe and healthy. The staff take very good care of you and you told us how much you value this. In lessons, you listen carefully to your teachers and settle down to work quickly. Sometimes, however, the work you are given to do is too easy and you do not make enough progress. You start chattering about other things and do not do as well as you should. There are two reasons for this. First, your teachers are not always sure what you already know and can do. This is

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

because, until recently, the school has not made sure that teachers have this information. We have asked your teachers to improve the way they use this information to plan their lessons, set you targets, mark your work and tell you how you can improve. Second, there is no overall plan to make sure that what you learn in one class builds on what you already know and will help you learn better in the future. We want your teachers to sort out which skills, such as planning a fair test in science or using library books to find out about the Amazon rainforest, they are going to teach you and then make sure that these fit into a whole-school plan. Your headteacher, Mr Clapham, came to the school last September. He has worked very hard with the staff and governors to find out what the school needs to do to improve, and particularly how to help you all do as well as you can. He is working with them to plan this all out. We think

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

it is very important that all the staff and governors are fully involved in this planning, checking that these plans are working and in planning for the future. You can help them by sharing your ideas with the School Council and making your best effort in all that you do in school. Keep working hard and enjoying school. Yours truly Mike Best Lead inspector 11 of 11 Inspection Report: St Andrew's Church of England Methodist (Aided) Primary School, 23 °24 June 2008

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion