Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Mill Lane Primary School

Inspected 20 Sept 2007 · published 11 Oct 2007 · URN 111539

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    20 Sept 2007

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Margaret Shepherd

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    TS18 1QX

  • Name on report verified

    Mill Lane Primary School

  • URN verified

    111539

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+86Very positivemore positive than 76% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexcellentoutstandingvery highstrongvery wellexceptionallyconsistentlyhigh quality
Criticisminadequatebelowseriouslylowerlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings2049w+88
  • What needs to improve76w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,097
shorter than usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 47
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
4
typical 8
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 96%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 0%

Full report text

Mill Lane Primary School Inspection report

p.1

111539 Unique Reference Number Stockton-on-Tees Local Authority 310623 Inspection number 20 September 2007 Inspection date Margaret Shepherd Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary Type of school Community School category 3 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 205 School The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Sacha Bedding Chair Mrs Carol O'Brien Headteacher 1 February 2004 Date of previous school inspection Wellington Street School address Stockton-on-Tees TS18 1QX 01642 860055 Telephone number 01642 860044 Fax number

p.1

3-11 Age group 20 September 2007 Inspection date 310623 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by one Additional Inspector.

p.3

Description of the school

The school serves an area with severe social and economic deprivation. There is a much higher proportion of pupils eligible for free school meals than average. More than half of the pupils come from a range of minority ethnic groups, with a high proportion having English as an additional language. There are more pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities than average. In some year groups, there is a high number of pupils leaving or joining the school in the middle of their education. Standards on entry are much lower than is typical for children of their age. The school includes a unit for pupils with speech and language difficulties. The inspector evaluated the overall effectiveness of the school and investigated the following issues: achievement and standards, personal development and well-being, care, guidance and support and leadership and management. Evidence was gathered from the school’s self

p.3

Description of the school

evaluation document, national published assessment data, lesson and playground observations, discussion with senior leaders and parents, scrutiny of pupils’ work, assessment data, pupils’ records and other documentation. Other aspects of the school’s work were not investigated in detail, but the inspector found no evidence to suggest that the school’s own evaluations were not justified. These aspects have been included in the report where appropriate.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 9 Inspection Report: Mill Lane Primary School, 20 September 2007

p.3

Grade: 2

This is a good school. Parents hold the school in very high regard and particularly value the contributions of the headteacher and the deputy headteacher. Achievement is good throughout the school, but standards are below average. The children start school in the Nursery with levels of development that are below those typical of most children of that age. By the end of the Reception, a minority of children reach national expectations but many are well below these especially in literacy and numeracy. The pupils’ good achievement is the result of consistently good teaching and learning, and a strong commitment from all staff to improve the school’s provision continually. Results of assessments at the end of Year 2 and national tests at the end of Year 6 have been rising steadily in recent years. In 2007, the results at the end of Year 2 showed that standards rose in mathematics and sharply so in reading and writing. At the end of Year 6, the results fell back from previous years

p.4

Grade: 2

but the year group included a high proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities. The results were also adversely affected by considerable numbers of pupils joining or leaving the school. The school greatly values its cultural diversity and the importance of providing equal opportunities for each pupil. It records individual progress very carefully and then analyses data systematically to plan work that matches different groups of pupils’ needs. Teaching and learning are consistently good. In lessons where teaching is outstanding, the pace of learning is always brisk. The organisation in the junior classes for pupils to work in small groups matched to pupils’ abilities in English and mathematics provides a good level of challenge for more able pupils and they achieve well. For example, Year 6 pupils confidently discussed the emotions of key characters in Hamlet. Support staff work in very effective teams to guide individuals and

p.4

Grade: 2

groups. They understand each pupil’s particular needs and have a very good understanding of the learning expected for each session. Bilingual support staff ensure that pupils in the early stages of learning English can take part in lessons, which results in very good levels of inclusion. All these strategies result in consistently good achievement, whether pupils are girls or boys, British or from an minority ethnic background, more able, average or with learning difficulties and/or disabilities. Pupils in the speech and language unit receive a careful mix of closely focused work in their own room and time with other pupils in the main school. Despite their complex learning difficulties, they achieve well. A key outstanding feature of the school is pupils’ personal development and well-being. This is a result of the school’s very high quality care, support and guidance. Safeguarding systems are in place. The headteacher sets the standard of building high quality relationships with each

p.4

Grade: 2

pupil and gaining an in-depth knowledge of the families and community that the school serves. Pupils say that they feel safe and secure. They show high levels of maturity and take their responsibilities very seriously. A member of the school council expressed this when he said, ‘We wear our badges with pride and we must provide a good role model’. The playground friends scheme is exemplary. Playtimes are happy, harmonious and productive times for the whole school community. The playground friends allocate their own responsibilities, set out a wide range of resources for pupils and organise activities, such as hockey games or quiet reading. Older pupils show great sensitivity to younger pupils; they all know the school rules extremely well and behaviour is excellent. There are very good levels of racial harmony, and boys and girls play happily together. Despite some pupils having severe behavioural difficulties, there have

p.4

Grade: 2

been no exclusions. Attendance rates have been rising steadily due to the strong stance the 4 of 9 Inspection Report: Mill Lane Primary School, 20 September 2007 headteacher has taken in emphasising the importance of this aspect to parents. Pupils show great respect for each other at all times. They thoroughly enjoy the ‘wake up shake up’ sessions each day and understand that, together with eating healthy foods, they are keeping healthy. There is a strong emphasis on personal development throughout the good quality curriculum. Pupils learn skills such as making decisions and working in teams, which prepare them well for their future economic well-being. Leadership and management are good. The headteacher and deputy headteacher work in close and very productive partnership to lead and manage the school. They share the same of vision of continual improvement, careful self-evaluation, fulfilling the needs of each individual and

p.4

Grade: 2

working very closely with pupils’ families and their community. They ensure that there are outstanding partnerships with others to promote pupils’ well-being. The senior leadership team works very well together and new coordinators are moving into their roles well. Governance is good with some governors having very close links with the school. Improvement since the previous inspection is good, as is the school’s capacity to succeed. It provides good value for money.

p.5

Grade: 2

Provision is good and children make good progress. Children get an outstanding start in the Nursery class due to the very high quality of teaching and learning. Very high expectations give children great confidence in developing basic skills. In Reception children make further good progress, building well on their excellent start. The indoor areas are well organised and provide a well-balanced curriculum but the outdoor areas do not provide enough opportunities for children’s development in each area of learning. Leadership is good and staff in the Foundation Stage work very closely with parents and families. This, together with a strong emphasis on personal development in lessons, results in very good achievement in this aspect.

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

■ Increase the consistency of the pace in lessons.

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

■ Extend the outdoor learning in the Foundation Stage. 5 of 9 Inspection Report: Mill Lane Primary School, 20 September 2007 .

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 of 9 Inspection Report: Mill Lane Primary School, 20 September 2007

p.6

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.7

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The effectiveness of the Foundation Stage 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.7

Achievement and standards

2 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.7

learners?

1 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 1 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 1 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 1 How well learners enjoy their education 3 The attendance of learners 1 The behaviour of learners 1 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.7

and interests of learners?

1 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.7

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 of 9 Inspection Report: Mill Lane Primary School, 20 September 2007

p.7

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 2 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 of 9 Inspection Report: Mill Lane Primary School, 20 September 2007

p.8

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

21 September 2007 Dear Pupils Inspection of Mill Lane Primary School, Stockton-on-Tees, TS18 1QX Thank you for being so very welcoming to me when I came to your school. You were all so friendly and helpful in answering my questions. I am writing to let you know what I found out. One of the best things in the school is the way that you all work and play so well together. I was really impressed with the way that the playground friends organise all the different activities. You try hard to be sensible and to help each other. You know the school rules very well and your behaviour is excellent. The adults in your classrooms work really well together to help each one of you and you try hard to improve your work in lessons. You understand how important it is to keep safe and healthy; you obviously enjoy your ‘wake up, shake up’ sessions. Members of the school council do an excellent job and they are very proud of representing your views.

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

The headteacher leads your school very well. She cares for each one of you, as well as all your families. She works very closely with the deputy headteacher and together they are helping all the staff to improve the school. The headteacher, staff and governors want to make your school an even better place to learn. They are going to make sure that you keep learning really well right through each lesson. They are also going to make the outdoor areas for the Nursery and Reception children more interesting places to learn. Once again, thank you again for being so helpful. I shall always remember the different things I saw you doing, particularly the playtimes. I wish you every success in your future lives. Yours sincerely Margaret Shepherd Lead inspector 9 of 9 Inspection Report: Mill Lane Primary School, 20 September 2007

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion