Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Woodley CofE Primary School

Inspected 18 Sept 2007 · published 3 Oct 2007 · URN 109988

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Hugh Protherough

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    18 Sept 2007

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Hugh Protherough

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    RG5 4UX

  • Name on report verified

    Woodley CofE Primary School

  • URN verified

    109988

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+44Positivemore positive than 29% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexceptionallystrongeffectivelypositiveexcellentconfidentconsistentlystrengths
Criticismnot alwaysinadequatebelowconcernsweakerlackstoo oftentoo few

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1972w+46
  • What needs to improve152w−14

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,096
shorter than usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
2
typical 8
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 89%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 4%

Full report text

Woodley CofE Primary School Inspection report

p.1

109988 Unique Reference Number Wokingham District Council Local Authority 310165 Inspection number 18 September 2007 Inspection date Hugh Protherough Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary Type of school Voluntary controlled School category 4 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 242 School The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs A Wild/Mrs M Babington Chair Mrs A Dee Headteacher 9 June 2003 Date of previous school inspection Hurricane Way School address Woodley Reading RG5 4UX 01189 693246 Telephone number 01189 696375 Fax number

p.1

4-11 Age group 18 September 2007 Inspection date 310165 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors. Inspectors evaluated the overall effectiveness of the school and investigated the following issues: the accuracy of the school's latest self-assessment and whether appropriate plans and actions are bringing about further improvement. Is pupils' writing and girls' performance in mathematics improving? Is the quality of the school's curriculum and teaching and learning good enough to raise standards and lift pupils' achievements? Evidence was gathered from analysis of pupils' work, observation of lessons, conversations with learners, discussions with teachers and senior staff. Other aspects of the school's work were not inspected in detail.

p.3

Description of the school

This average-sized primary school serves a socially well-favoured and supportive community. Currently there are many more boys than girls on roll. The majority of pupils are of white ethnic origin, but there are also about 15% from a wide variety of other ethnic backgrounds. A few of these speak English as an additional language, and two are at the early stages of acquisition. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities (LDD) is below average, but those with statements of special educational need (SEN), above average. Over the past twelve months, the school has experienced considerable changes in its staffing including the appointment of a new headteacher and deputy headteacher.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 9 Inspection Report: Woodley CofE Primary School, 18 September 2007

p.3

Grade: 3

This popular school benefits from strong parental and community support. However, a survey conducted by the new headteacher earlier this year exposed a number of concerns about the school's performance. Inspectors' conversations with parents and analysis of the Ofsted questionnaires suggest rapid improvement in several areas, not least in respect of behaviour, the setting of homework and communication between home and school. This type of enquiry has typified the early work of the new headteacher and her deputy. They have taught alongside teachers, analysed the school's performance data, reviewed the curriculum and consulted with staff and pupils. A clear and increasingly well-evidenced picture is emerging of a school where pupils currently receive a satisfactory quality of education. The inspectors agree with this evaluation. Pupils are friendly and hard-working and they behave well. Most are socially confident and

p.4

Grade: 3

respond positively when in conversation with adults. Many have extensive general knowledge and genuine interest in their studies. They know how to keep fit and healthy and many demonstrate this by cycling to school and cultivating vegetables on the school's allotment. There has been enthusiastic response to the increase in extra-curricular activities and the recent school council elections were keenly contested. The school has a history of pupils reaching above average standards in the national tests. This is as it should be given that the abilities of the children when starting school are frequently in advance of those usually found. In 2006 Year 6 achieved satisfactorily. Results were strongest in mathematics and science; performance in English lowered by weaker results in writing. However, the strong performance of boys in mathematics masked the fact girls were not doing as well in this subject. This pattern continued in the latest provisional results for 2007. Why is

p.4

Grade: 3

this? Most pupils develop good levels of literacy during their time at school. Early reading skills are swiftly established and pupils taught systematically about letter sounds. Pupils' strong speaking and listening skills are extending through the recent introduction of talk partners to support class discussions. Although pupils produce a good volume of written work, teaching lacks consistency and teachers' expectations of what the pupils can achieve are not always high enough. Although most five year olds know how to hold a pencil, the mechanics of handwriting such as letter formation are not taught progressively through the school. As a result, a small but significant minority of pupils are slow to develop the fast, fluent style of which they are capable. Conversations with older pupils reveal that most are motivated when practising and applying writing skills across all subjects of the National Curriculum, but this approach is not

p.4

Grade: 3

yet firmly established. In mathematics lessons the Year 5 and 6 pupils are divided into sets based upon their abilities. Teachers make clear to pupils what they are expected to learn, and question perceptively to check their understanding. However, too often the same activity is presented to the whole class and opportunities to extend or support learning are missed. There are proportionately fewer girls in the top sets and they tend to sit together during lessons. However, most are confident in their performance and their progress in lessons seen during the inspection was the same as the boys. Inspectors agree with the school's own evaluation that pupils have until recently, had too few opportunities for the problem solving and investigative work that would encourage the application of their good basic skills and lift achievement. 4 of 9 Inspection Report: Woodley CofE Primary School, 18 September 2007

p.4

Grade: 3

Throughout the school relationships between staff and pupils are good and contribute to the positive ethos for study. Teachers plan conscientiously and ensure that pupils experience a fuller curriculum than that reported at the time of the previous inspection. They build a reasonable knowledge of their pupils through their day-to-day contact and their attentive pastoral care. However, approaches to assessing and recording what pupils know, can do and understand are inconsistent. As a result, lesson planning is not always as incisive as it might be in setting consistently challenging work and ensuring a rapid pace to learning. These variations have also had a negative effect on the school's capacity to set realistic and challenging targets. Inspectors agree with the school's recent analysis that existing targets for the current Year 6 are unrealistic and unlikely to be met. The headteacher, her deputy and governors are working together effectively in leading the

p.5

Grade: 3

school towards improved performance. For instance, their ongoing review of the school's staffing structure is successfully addressing the issues raised by the widespread changes to the school's personnel. The development of phase and curriculum teams is an important first step to creating greater consistency of approach across the school.

p.5

Grade: 3

At the time of the inspection eleven, four and five year olds were attending a mixed age, Reception-Year 1 class during the morning session. The children are well cared for and have settled happily into the routines of school. Many are already working at the levels expected nationally for children at the end of their Reception year. For instance, at the start of the day the children enter class with confidence, self-register and settle swiftly to purposeful activities. They work co-operatively and are happy to talk and share ideas with each other and the adults. A discussion about autumn revealed their good knowledge of the seasons and weather. When discussing the date, most could count beyond ten and a few explained the difference between odd and even numbers. Several read names and captions on displays. The new nursery nurse has been quick to recognise the strengths of pupils' communication and language skills. She

p.5

Grade: 3

provides helpful activities that support the development of early writing skills including letter formation linked with work on initial sounds. Levels of co-operation amongst the children are high. The headteacher has rightly queried why the profiles of the children leaving Reception in summer 2007 suggest that many were performing at levels lower than expected nationally. As a result, arrangements for the day-to-day assessment of pupils have been revised and now offer opportunity for more comprehensive evaluation of the children's performance across all areas of learning.

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

■ Increase the pace and demand of teaching to meet the needs and enthusiasms of all pupils and further improve their achievement, especially in mathematics and writing. ■ Develop the use of test and assessment data to set accurate, challenging targets for individuals and groups of pupils. ■ Build the staff team so that all develop their roles as leaders and managers.

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

A small proportion of schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory but which have areas of underperformance will receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection. 5 of 9 Inspection Report: Woodley CofE Primary School, 18 September 2007 .

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 of 9 Inspection Report: Woodley CofE Primary School, 18 September 2007

p.6

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.7

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 3 The effectiveness of the Foundation Stage 3 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.7

Achievement and standards

3 How well do learners achieve? 2 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.7

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The attendance of learners 2 The behaviour of learners 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.7

and interests of learners?

3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.7

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 of 9 Inspection Report: Woodley CofE Primary School, 18 September 2007

p.7

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 4 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 of 9 Inspection Report: Woodley CofE Primary School, 18 September 2007

p.8

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

26 September 2007 Dear Pupils Inspection of Woodley CofE Primary School,Reading,RG5 4UX Thank you for making us so welcome when we visited your school earlier this month. I promised that I would write to let you know what we found out, so here goes... Your school has gone through many changes over the past year and currently we judge it as satisfactory. I'm going to tell you what needs to happen so that next time the inspectors visit you they'll say your school is excellent! Your friendly approach, good behaviour and positive approach to work are important strengths of the school. Even so, we think you could achieve more. We want the teachers to find out more about what you know and understand and to set you work that really makes you think hard. You can help by discussing your work with your teachers and thinking about the targets you are going to set yourselves. In particular, we would like to see further improvement in your

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

writing and more girls doing well in mathematics. We are pleased with the way that your governors and new headteacher are working together. They have made a good start to building the new staff team, but like any team it takes a while for the 'players' to get to know each other. You can help them best by continuing to work hard, making the most of everything your school has to offer. With best wishes for the future. Yours sincerely, Hugh Protherough Lead Inspector 9 of 9 Inspection Report: Woodley CofE Primary School, 18 September 2007

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion