Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Lidlington Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
4 Oct 2007
- Inspectorssingle source
Colin Henderson
- Overall effectiveness verified
Good
- Postcode verified
MK43 0SB
- Name on report verified
Thomas Johnson Lower School
- URN verified
109468
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallGood
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Good.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school's success is built on the excellent leadership of the headteacher, a strong staff team, good teaching, an outstanding curriculum and good links with parents to support their children's learning. p.4
- Achievement in Years 3 and 4 is excellent because of very effective teaching and pupils' enthusiasm for learning. p.4
- They clearly enjoy school - 'they are all our friends!' Their enthusiasm for school is evident in their excellent attendance and positive attitudes in lessons. p.4
- All staff know their pupils very well and provide outstanding pastoral care. p.4
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 of 9 Inspection Report: Thomas Johnson Lower School, 4 October 2007 p.7
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- They monitor closely what the school provides, although some aspects of their evaluations are not always sufficiently rigorous. p.5
- Many exceed the learning targets expected of them by the time they move into Year 1, although weaknesses in aspects of speech and language limit the achievement of some children in developing their early writing skills. p.4
- Weaknesses in some pupils' knowledge and understanding of how to solve number problems restrict their achievement in aspects of mathematics. p.4
- Weaknesses in some children's speech and language skills limit their progress. p.5
- The headteacher has resources in place to improve this weakness. p.5
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- ■ Improve pupils' skills in writing and solving number problems by extending good practice in teaching, target-setting and assessment to help all pupils know what they need to do to raise the standard of their work. 5 of 9 Inspection Report: Thomas Johnson Lower School, 4 October 2007 . p.5
- in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 of 9 Inspection Report: Thomas Johnson Lower School, 4 October 2007 p.6
- School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate p.7
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 9
- Words of findings
- 1,949
- shorter than usual (typical 2775)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 47
- Average sentence
- 20 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 12%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Thomas Johnson Lower School Inspection report
p.1
109468 Unique Reference Number BEDFORDSHIRE LA Local Authority 309996 Inspection number 4 October 2007 Inspection date Colin Henderson Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Primary Type of school Community School category 3 °9 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 94 School The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Debbie Ralphs Chair Mr Kevin Nolan Headteacher 9 February 2004 Date of previous school inspection Hurst Grove School address Lidlington Bedford Bedfordshire MK43 0SB 01525402377 Telephone number 01525 404743 Fax number
p.1
3-9 Age group 4 October 2007 Inspection date 309996 Inspection number .
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by one Additional Inspector in one day.
p.3
Description of the school
A significant majority of children come from the local village which reflects a broad range of social backgrounds. All pupils speak English as their first language. The number of pupils with learning difficulties or disabilities is fewer than in most other schools of this size. The attainment of children who start in the Nursery varies from year to year, although it is generally just above national expectations.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 9 Inspection Report: Thomas Johnson Lower School, 4 October 2007
p.3
Grade: 2
This is a good school with some outstanding features. It serves its community well and gives good value for money. The school provides a very caring and supportive ethos that is valued highly by pupils and their parents - 'we are very lucky to have such a great school in such a small community'. The school's success is built on the excellent leadership of the headteacher, a strong staff team, good teaching, an outstanding curriculum and good links with parents to support their children's learning. Good procedures help the school to gain a clear understanding of how well it is doing and to identify and improve weaknesses. Pupils' achievement is good overall. Children achieve well in the Nursery class and in the Reception Year. Many exceed the learning targets expected of them by the time they move into Year 1, although weaknesses in aspects of speech and language limit the achievement of some children in developing their early writing skills. Achievement in Years 1 and 2 is good.
p.4
Grade: 2
Year 2 pupils attain standards that are above average overall as reflected in the results of national tests. Test results have dipped recently in writing to broadly average levels. Weaknesses in some pupils' knowledge and understanding of how to solve number problems restrict their achievement in aspects of mathematics. Achievement in Years 3 and 4 is excellent because of very effective teaching and pupils' enthusiasm for learning. By the end of Year 4, pupils attain standards that are significantly above, and in some areas well above, expected levels. Pupils with educational difficulties or disabilities receive effective support from teachers and teaching assistants and make good progress. Pupils' personal development and well-being are outstanding. They clearly enjoy school - 'they are all our friends!' Their enthusiasm for school is evident in their excellent attendance and positive attitudes in lessons. Their behaviour is exemplary in class and around the school. Pupils'
p.4
Grade: 2
spiritual, moral, social, and cultural development is excellent. They talk enthusiastically about the excellent learning activities including the good range of extra-curricular activities. Their participation in a wide range of sports helps pupils to have a detailed understanding of healthy and safe lifestyles. Staff give high priority to pupils' personal development. Relationships are outstanding throughout the school, as reflected by older pupils looking after the younger ones in the playground. Pupils enjoy taking increasing responsibility for their own learning and for contributing to the school community, for example, through the school council. Teaching is good. It is outstanding in Years 3 and 4. Teachers know their pupils very well and plan the activities carefully to meet their different learning needs. Teachers use resources effectively to capture pupils' interest, as, for example, when Year 3 and 4 pupils sat in their
p.4
Grade: 2
imaginary 'Saxon Hall' and listened with rapt attention to the storyteller. The headteacher, supported successfully by his Primary Strategy leader, is focusing strongly on raising standards in writing and improving pupils' skills in solving number problems. They have introduced some new initiatives, for example, using pupil improvement targets and effective marking. These are working particularly successfully in Years 3 and 4 and, as a result, standards are high. They have yet to be implemented as successfully in other classes. All staff know their pupils very well and provide outstanding pastoral care. Pupils are confident about approaching any adult if they have a concern. All legal requirements for safeguarding pupils' welfare are met. Care, guidance and support of pupils are effective. Academic guidance is good. Teachers and the headteacher use regular assessments to check how well each pupil is doing. They use this information to guide their teaching and, working closely with teaching
p.4
Grade: 2
4 of 9 Inspection Report: Thomas Johnson Lower School, 4 October 2007 assistants, provide further support to pupils whose progress is not what is expected. Some teachers encourage pupils to assess their own work carefully or that of a partner. This helps them to understand what level they are attaining and what they need to do to improve. Such practices are improving pupils' work, although they are not consistently developed to ensure that each pupil knows and understands what to do to raise the standard of their work. Leadership and management are good. The leadership of the headteacher is excellent. It provides a strong direction to the work of the school and is valued by parents - 'He is a strong headteacher yet is always approachable and willing to listen'. He has established a good team of staff who work very well together to try to meet the learning needs of each pupil. They encourage parents
p.4
Grade: 2
to become fully involved in working with the school to support their children's learning. Governors are supportive and work well with staff to check on how well the school is doing, particularly in key subjects. They monitor closely what the school provides, although some aspects of their evaluations are not always sufficiently rigorous. The strong team ethos and the consistent focus on improvement provided by the headteacher and some key staff are improving the school, for example through better accommodation and resources. This is raising standards, including those in information and communication technology. The school is well placed to make good improvement.
p.5
Grade: 2
Children in the Nursery and Reception Year have a good start to schooling. Good teaching and an effective range of well-organised and interesting learning activities help children to settle quickly and happily into school life. The Nursery manager works closely with the Class 1 teacher to ensure good continuity of learning. Opportunities for Reception pupils to use the full range of facilities each morning help them to make good progress, particularly in personal, social and emotional development. Weaknesses in some children's speech and language skills limit their progress. The headteacher has resources in place to improve this weakness.
p.5
What the school should do to improve further
■ Improve pupils' skills in writing and solving number problems by extending good practice in teaching, target-setting and assessment to help all pupils know what they need to do to raise the standard of their work. 5 of 9 Inspection Report: Thomas Johnson Lower School, 4 October 2007 .
p.5
What the school should do to improve further
in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 of 9 Inspection Report: Thomas Johnson Lower School, 4 October 2007
p.6
Inspection judgements
School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.7
Overall effectiveness
How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The effectiveness of the Foundation Stage 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements
p.7
Achievement and standards
2 How well do learners achieve? 2 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.7
learners?
1 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 1 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 1 How well learners enjoy their education 1 The attendance of learners 1 The behaviour of learners 1 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.7
and interests of learners?
2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.7
and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 of 9 Inspection Report: Thomas Johnson Lower School, 4 October 2007
p.7
and supporting all learners?
How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 2 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 of 9 Inspection Report: Thomas Johnson Lower School, 4 October 2007
p.8
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
5 October 2007 Dear Children Inspection of Thomas Johnson Lower School, Lidlington, MK43 0SB Thank you for being so friendly and making me feel welcome when I visited your school recently. I enjoyed talking to you, looking at your work and watching you learn. You clearly enjoy school and, together with your parents, you think that it is a good school - and I agree. I was pleased to see how well you get on together. Your behaviour is excellent and this means that teachers can get on with the job of helping you learn. It was interesting to talk to school councillors about how they are helping to improve the school. They have some good ideas and enjoy being responsible. You told me that you learn a lot in school and really enjoy your work, especially the many interesting clubs and activities and the different visits and visitors. I think that your learning is good. Your teachers make your lessons interesting and you try hard to do what your teachers
p.9
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
ask. Some of you have a good understanding of how to improve your work and are working hard to achieve your learning targets. I have asked the teachers to help all of you to understand what you need to do to improve your work, especially your writing and solving number problems. Work has already started to help you do this and Mr Nolan, the staff and governors are working hard to make your school even better. I hope that you continue to be happy at school and carry on working hard. Colin Henderson Additional Inspector 9 of 9 Inspection Report: Thomas Johnson Lower School, 4 October 2007
p.9
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion