Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Bernard Gilpin Primary School

Inspected 27 Jun 2008 · published 18 Jul 2008 · URN 108830

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Peter Bannon

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    27 Jun 2008

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Peter Bannon

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    DH5 8DA

  • Name on report verified

    Bernard Gilpin Primary School

  • URN verified

    108830

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+51Positivemore positive than 42% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectivelyexceptionallystrongenjoyeffectiveimprovingclearpositive
Criticismnot alwaysinadequatebelownot effectiveinsufficientseriouslyfalling behindnot strong

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1778w+59
  • What needs to improve1164w+28

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,909
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%What needs to improve 39%About the inspection 0%

Full report text

Bernard Gilpin Primary School Inspection report

p.1

108830 Unique Reference Number Sunderland Local Authority 309809 Inspection number 26 °27 June 2008 Inspection dates Peter Bannon Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary Type of school Community School category 4 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 303 School The governing body Appropriate authority Cllr Robert Heron Chair Mrs Ann McMaster Headteacher 1 June 2005 Date of previous school inspection Hall Lane School address Houghton le Spring Tyne and Wear DH5 8DA 0191 5536523 Telephone number 0191 5536525 Fax number

p.1

4-11 Age group 26 °27 June 2008 Inspection dates 309809 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by three Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

Bernard Gilpin Primary School is larger than average. It was built in 1993 to replace separate infant and junior schools and occupies a spacious site. It serves an area that is mixed in terms of socio-economic character. Numbers on roll are in decline, partly as a result of the demolition of some housing near to the school. The number of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities, particularly speech and/or communication problems, is above average for the size of the school. A slightly above average proportion of pupils is entitled to free school meals. Almost all pupils are of White British heritage.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 11 Inspection Report: Bernard Gilpin Primary School, 26 °27 June 2008

p.3

Grade: 3

Bernard Gilpin Primary is a satisfactory school. It provides a safe environment and parents are right to be happy that their children are well cared for and develop good personal skills. Standards vary by the time pupils leave school, from average for the 2007 leavers to below average for the current Year 6. However, achievement is broadly satisfactory for all pupils in relation to their starting points when they entered Reception. Standards at the end of Year 2 are broadly average and pupils make satisfactory progress. Pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities make satisfactory progress. Pupils’ personal development is good. The school has a good caring ethos and promotes a strong sense of right and wrong, resulting in good attendance and behaviour. Pupils show high levels of confidence, such as when performing in talent shows for parents. Pupils act sensibly and safely and they understand how to maintain a healthy lifestyle. They take on responsibility

p.4

Grade: 3

in the school council and show a good awareness of what it takes to be a good citizen. Good social skills and satisfactory basic skills in literacy and numeracy prepare pupils adequately for their future. Teaching is satisfactory overall. Teachers target work at challenging levels, but sometimes do not make clear to pupils how to improve. In lessons where pupils are actively involved in a range of activities using a variety of resources, they learn well. In a Year 1 numeracy lesson pupils learned about capacity extremely well because of the practical use of a drum, and by talking in rhyme. In less effective lessons, for example when teachers talk for too long, usually at the start, pupils are less engaged and lose concentration. Learning is enhanced by a curriculum that is satisfactory overall with good features in personal education, the use of themed weeks, visits and extra-curricular activities. However, there is insufficient promotion of basic skills in

p.4

Grade: 3

subjects across the curriculum. Leadership has ensured that the school still runs smoothly despite significant staff absence in recent years. Subject leaders are actively involved in improving their subject areas and teachers are given good advice on how to improve by the headteacher and other leaders. However, sometimes the school does not recognise or tackle pupils’ underachievement quickly enough. The school provides satisfactory value for money. The school has satisfactory capacity to improve because it evaluates itself accurately and knows what is needed to be done. It has been a little slow in acting in the past but improvements have been made since the last inspection. Governance is satisfactory. Governors hold the school to account and are more involved in school life than at the time of the previous inspection. The return of parents’ questionnaires indicates high levels of satisfaction with the school. A typical comment was, ‘I would advise

p.4

Grade: 3

anybody and everybody to use this school’.

p.4

Grade: 2

The quality and provision in the Foundation Stage are good and give children a strong start. The good teaching and relationships in the Reception classes help promote a joy of learning as well as the ability to concentrate and work together effectively. Teamwork is a strong feature of the work of the two Reception classes so that children have regular access to outdoor learning. Here staff use their creative talents well to make learning as enjoyable as possible despite very limited resources and equipment. Attainment on entry varies, but children start in Reception 4 of 11 Inspection Report: Bernard Gilpin Primary School, 26 °27 June 2008 with standards that are usually below those typical for their age, and make good progress. By the time they move into Year 1 they are generally achieving standards that are typical for their age in all areas of learning. A high priority is given to promoting basic communication, language

p.4

Grade: 2

and literacy skills in practical and enjoyable ways. For example, the more able children showed good understanding of numbers as they counted in twos, and showed talent in their writing in ‘bean diaries.’ Children play and work independently. Adult support is timely and effectively extends children’s knowledge and understanding of, for example, the habits of snails and other mini-beasts. Assessment effectively balances focused observations in adult-led activities with observations of children at play. Children are well cared for. Good support and coaching for new staff and a clear vision for developments to the Foundation Stage are impressive features of the Foundation Stage leader’s good leadership and management.

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

■ Improve the quality of teaching so that all pupils are more engaged and actively involved in their learning. ■ Ensure that leadership of the school acts more promptly to identify and support pupils likely to underachieve. ■ Provide the Foundation Stage with a well resourced and equipped outdoor area so that children have full access to all areas of learning inside and outside. A small proportion of the schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory but which have areas of underperformance will receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.

p.5

Grade: 3

Achievement is satisfactory. Pupils generally leave Reception with standards that are broadly in line with national expectations. They make satisfactory progress to reach broadly average standards by the time they leave. This represents satisfactory achievement throughout their time in school. In 2007, results from national tests showed that by the end of Year 2, pupils reached standards that were in line with national norms in reading and a little below in writing and mathematics. Year 6 results in national tests in English, mathematics and science for 2007 were a little above average. For these pupils, this showed satisfactory progress from their starting points in Reception. In 2007, the school met all its targets apart from that relating to the number of pupils reaching the higher level in mathematics. Attainment in all three subjects has risen faster than the national trend in the last two years following a dip in 2005. Girls’

p.5

Grade: 3

attainment is higher than that of boys because they start from a higher baseline; their rate of progress is similar. Pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities make satisfactory progress. School data suggests that although standards have dipped a little for Year 6 pupils, current challenging targets for all pupils are likely to be met.

p.5

Grade: 2

Personal development and well-being are good. Pupils behave well, and show good attitudes to learning. Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development are good overall. Pupils show a good sense of right and wrong, get on well together and have high levels of confidence. However, spiritual development is not as strong. Pupils enjoy school. Attendance is above average and many pupils take part in extra-curricular activities and talk warmly about how 5 of 11 Inspection Report: Bernard Gilpin Primary School, 26 °27 June 2008 much they enjoy lessons. They have a good knowledge of the need for healthy lifestyles through the effective provision for personal, social, health and citizenship education. Pupils act safely and sensibly and behaviour is good. Pupils make a highly positive contribution to the community. They deliver parcels within the local community at Christmas and put on shows. The school council equips pupils well for their roles in later life. For most pupils preparation for their future

p.5

Grade: 2

economic well-being is satisfactory rather than good, because pupils leave school with basic skills that are in line with expectation.

p.6

Grade: 3

The quality of teaching is satisfactory. In good lessons, pupils’ work is well matched to their capabilities and as a result they progress well. For example, younger pupils use equipment effectively to enable them to add numbers. Lessons are planned well, learning objectives are shared and outcomes are displayed and discussed. Pupils’ misunderstandings are noticed and clarified using probing questioning and clear explanations, sometimes with the aid of the interactive whiteboard. Relationships are good and there is usually a lively pace. Pupils behave well and show good levels of co-operation. The support for pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities, though variable, is satisfactory. Parents are very appreciative of the support their children receive. In less effective lessons, introductions are often dominated by the teacher talking for too long, and there is less engagement and active involvement of pupils. Occasionally,

p.6

Grade: 3

the pace of lessons is too brisk and sometimes pupils are unsure about their learning because too little time is given to reviewing what has been securely learned towards the end of lessons.

p.6

Grade: 3

The curriculum is satisfactory. All statutory requirements are met and the curriculum is broad and balanced. It is enriched by a wide range of activities such as residential outdoor weekends, visits to art galleries and by having visiting speakers and themed weeks such as the recent ‘Africa’ week. Pupils’ personal development is effectively catered for in the well-structured personal, social, health and citizenship programme. A strength of this programme is the unit on relationships. Provision for pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is satisfactory. Whilst there is adequate provision for the basic skills of literacy, numeracy and information and communication technology (ICT), some teachers do not do enough to promote these through other subjects. The use of thinking skills in lessons such as history and geography is improving provision in these areas. There is a good range of extra-curricular activities including sports

p.6

Grade: 3

and drama, and these are well supported by pupils.

p.6

Grade: 3

Care, guidance and support are satisfactory. Arrangements for child protection and risk assessment procedures are in place. Safeguarding meets requirements. Committed staff work hard to promote the personal development of pupils. The school’s focus on improving attendance has resulted in above average attendance. Parents appreciate that school listens to and deals with their problems quickly and effectively. There is satisfactory provision for pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities, and for vulnerable pupils. A system for tracking academic 6 of 11 Inspection Report: Bernard Gilpin Primary School, 26 °27 June 2008 progress is in place. The system is new and is generally adequate, but information gathered is sometimes not acted upon quickly enough to stem underachievement. Whilst feedback to pupils is regular, it is not always made clear to them how to improve.

p.6

Grade: 3

Leadership and management are satisfactory. The school has taken on board issues from the previous inspection and subject leaders now have more influence on improving their subject areas. Teachers are now making better use of assessment data in lesson planning. Teaching is monitored rigorously and targets set for pupils are challenging. However, there is too little emphasis on checking pupils’ progress over time and ensuring that targets are being met so that pupils likely to underachieve are not always recognised or supported quickly enough. Staff absences have presented a considerable challenge to the headteacher and senior leaders. This has been an opportunity for some staff to develop leadership skills and the school has continued to run smoothly on a day-to-day basis. However, there has been a negative impact on the achievement of some pupils, particularly in Year 6. Governors are committed and supportive

p.7

Grade: 3

of the school. They now hold the school to account adequately. The school has satisfactory links with partner institutions and offers satisfactory value for money. 7 of 11 Inspection Report: Bernard Gilpin Primary School, 26 °27 June 2008 .

p.7

Grade: 3

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 8 of 11 Inspection Report: Bernard Gilpin Primary School, 26 °27 June 2008

p.8

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The effectiveness of the Foundation Stage 3 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.9

Achievement and standards

3 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The attendance of learners 2 The behaviour of learners 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

and interests of learners?

3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 9 of 11 Inspection Report: Bernard Gilpin Primary School, 26 °27 June 2008

p.9

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 3 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 10 of 11 Inspection Report: Bernard Gilpin Primary School, 26 °27 June 2008

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

30 June 2008 Dear Pupils Inspection of Bernard Gilpin Primary School, Sunderland, DH5 8DA I am writing to thank you for the warm welcome you gave us and for talking to us about your school. We think your school provides you with a satisfactory education and has some good features. It was a pleasure to see how you got on so well together, and also how well behaved and polite you were. It was particularly impressive to see how talented and confident you were when entertaining your parents in the leavers’ show. From the Reception classes to Year 6 you enjoy school. We know this because you told us so. It is also clear from your good attendance and the way you concentrate in lessons when the work is interesting. Your school is a safe place to be and you help by acting sensibly and trying to be healthy by not eating sweets and taking part in extra sport. You learn about being responsible well and are suitably prepared for your

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

future. Your school council is taken seriously by everyone and certainly works in making your views known. Your personal qualities are good. Your teachers are eager to make your school better. We have suggested that they might concentrate on three things to improve the school. One is to give you more opportunities to be actively involved in your learning. The second is to make sure that they watch closely for anyone falling behind in their work and make sure those pupils get the support they need to catch up quickly. The third thing is to improve the outdoor play facilities for the children who will be in the Reception classes in the future. You can certainly help with the first two by being enthusiastic and by keeping up your efforts to make sure that you keep working hard so that you achieve as well as you can. Thank you again for your courtesy and friendliness. Our two days in your school were interesting

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

and enjoyable. We wish you every success in the future. Yours sincerely Peter Bannon Lead inspector 11 of 11 Inspection Report: Bernard Gilpin Primary School, 26 °27 June 2008

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion