Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Carville Primary SchoolOfsted inspection, 29 Nov 2007
Ofsted inspected Carville Primary School on 29 Nov 2007, led by Derek Neil. The overall judgement was Inadequate. Ofsted published the report on 14 Jan 2008. Source: Ofsted (Open Government Licence v3).
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
29 Nov 2007
- Inspectorssingle source
Derek Neil
- Achievement verified
Inadequate
- Care guidance support verified
Satisfactory
- Curriculum verified
Inadequate
- Leadership and management verified
Inadequate
- Overall effectiveness verified
Inadequate
- Personal development verified
Satisfactory
- Teaching and learning verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
NE28 6AX
- Name on report verified
Carville Primary School
- URN verified
108592
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallInadequate
- AchievementInadequate
- Care guidance supportSatisfactory
- CurriculumInadequate
- Leadership and managementInadequate
- Personal developmentSatisfactory
- Teaching and learningSatisfactory
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 9 of 11 Inspection Report: Carville Primary School, 28 °29 November 2007 p.9
- They have positive attitudes to work and enjoy many aspects of school. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- The school recognises that achievement has been poor in the past because of weaknesses in the teaching. p.4
- The staff like him and he has a good relationship with them.’ However, standards are low and achievement is inadequate. p.4
- The school judged that everything was now at least satisfactory because of recent improvements in its results in national tests, but in fact much is still inadequate. p.4
- These have not always been managed effectively. p.4
- Weaknesses in management have been compounded by inaccurate self-evaluation. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- When pupils enter Year 1 their skills are below the goals for children of their age, particularly in reading and writing. p.5
- Their progress over the next two years is not good enough, though it accelerates towards the end of the key stage. p.5
- The school has raised standards recently after a period of decline, but they remain below average. p.5
- Very few pupils reach the higher levels normally expected of the most able pupils. p.5
- Pupils’ progress in Key Stage 2 is uneven; it is more rapid towards the end of the key stage, where teachers plan ambitious lessons to get the best out of all their pupils. p.5
- Since the school became an all-through primary, standards have been well below average. p.5
- Things have improved recently and last year the results in the national tests were only slightly below average. p.5
- This led the school to judge that pupils’ progress was satisfactory. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language8
“Their physical development is their strongest area but their language development is weak.” p.4
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 3,349
- about usual (typical 2932)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 51, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 18 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 16%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Carville Primary School Inspection report
p.1
108592 Unique Reference Number North Tyneside Local Authority 309735 Inspection number 28 °29 November 2007 Inspection dates Derek Neil HMI Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Primary Type of school Community School category 3 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 158 School The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Deborah Basara Chair Mrs Maureen Moore Headteacher 1 February 2004 Date of previous school inspection The Avenue School address Wallsend Tyne and Wear NE28 6AX 0191 2007236 Telephone number 0191 2006962 Fax number
p.1
3-11 Age group 28 °29 November 2007 Inspection dates 309735 Inspection number .
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by two of Her Majesty’s Inspectors.
p.3
Description of the school
Carville is a small primary school situated in the Wallsend ward of North Tyneside, an area which has a high degree of social deprivation. Formerly a first school for pupils aged 3 to 9 years; it became a primary school for pupils aged 3 to 11 years in 2002. It had its first set of national test results for Key Stage 2 in 2003. In recent years the number of pupils attending the school has fallen considerably. The attainment of pupils when they start school in the Nursery and in Reception is low. A very high proportion of pupils are eligible for free school meals. The proportion of pupils who have learning difficulties and/or disabilities is above average. The percentage of pupils whose first language is not English is about average. The school has the Healthy School Award, Activemark status and the Basic Skills Quality Mark.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 11 Inspection Report: Carville Primary School, 28 °29 November 2007
p.3
Grade: 4
In accordance with section 13 (3) of the Education Act 2005, HMCI is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement, because it is performing significantly less well than in all the circumstances it could reasonably be expected to perform. The school is therefore given a Notice to Improve. Significant improvement is required in relation to the Foundation Stage, pupils’ achievement in English, the curriculum, and managers’ evaluation of the school’s performance. Carville Primary School is popular with many parents because of the staff’s care and concern for their children. As one parent wrote, ‘My son has been made very welcome and is well cared for. He is in very good hands. He never complains about going to school. The staff like him and he has a good relationship with them.’ However, standards are low and achievement is inadequate. Pupils do not express themselves well in speech or in writing. This is largely because the curriculum provides too few opportunities
p.4
Grade: 4
for them to develop their language skills to a high enough level. The school recognises that achievement has been poor in the past because of weaknesses in the teaching. The legacy of underachievement is still evident in the slow progress pupils are making in some year groups. Recently the quality of teaching has improved and is now satisfactory, though it remains patchy. Pupils are served better at the end of each key stage, where their progress is suddenly accelerated by some intensive and well focused teaching. Pupils’ personal development is satisfactory. They have positive attitudes to work and enjoy many aspects of school. However, a minority of parents and pupils are concerned about behaviour, which is not always dealt quickly enough. Attendance is below average and the school recognises it needs to work harder to get its persistent absentees into school more often. Staff also recognise the need to involve more parents in the school. To this end some new ideas
p.4
Grade: 4
have been introduced but so far with limited success. Several parents feel their views and concerns are not taken sufficiently into account by the school. The school has faced some difficult challenges in recent years, including staff absences and a falling roll. These have not always been managed effectively. Although progress has been made since the last inspection in some areas, little has been accomplished in others. Weaknesses in management have been compounded by inaccurate self-evaluation. The school judged that everything was now at least satisfactory because of recent improvements in its results in national tests, but in fact much is still inadequate. Monitoring of the school’s work lacks rigour and does not consider its impact on pupils’ learning. As a result of external advice, staff now have a more realistic knowledge of the school’s strengths and weaknesses, an understanding of what they
p.4
Grade: 4
need to do, and a commitment to get things right. Improvements are already evident. The capacity to improve further is satisfactory.
p.4
Grade: 4
Children enter the Foundation Stage with varying levels of skills which, overall, are below what is typical for children of their age. Their physical development is their strongest area but their language development is weak. Relationships between adults and children are good and this enables children to settle quickly into routines, behave well and enjoy their learning. The environment is well ordered. Children are valued and cared for well. The curriculum offers a 4 of 11 Inspection Report: Carville Primary School, 28 °29 November 2007 wide range of different experiences but adult-led activities are not planned effectively to help children to develop their skills in speaking and writing. Adults do not encourage children to answer questions in full sentences. Planned opportunities for teaching early writing skills are unsatisfactory; for example, pupils are not taught well how to hold their pencils, form letters
p.4
Grade: 4
and write their names. The pupils do not make sufficient progress and when they move into Year 1 their standards remain below those expected. The staff are aware of the improvements that are needed and have begun to act on local authority advice, for example by improving their use of the outdoor area for learning.
p.5
What the school should do to improve further
■ improve achievement by developing pupils’ spoken and written English throughout the school, particularly by planning the curriculum better; ■ improve the Foundation Stage;
p.5
What the school should do to improve further
■ evaluate more rigorously the impact of provision on the pupils’ performance and development;
p.5
What the school should do to improve further
■ increase parents’ involvement in the life of the school;
p.5
Grade: 4
When pupils enter Year 1 their skills are below the goals for children of their age, particularly in reading and writing. Their progress over the next two years is not good enough, though it accelerates towards the end of the key stage. The school has raised standards recently after a period of decline, but they remain below average. Very few pupils reach the higher levels normally expected of the most able pupils. Pupils’ progress in Key Stage 2 is uneven; it is more rapid towards the end of the key stage, where teachers plan ambitious lessons to get the best out of all their pupils. Since the school became an all-through primary, standards have been well below average. Things have improved recently and last year the results in the national tests were only slightly below average. This led the school to judge that pupils’ progress was satisfactory. However this assessment masks considerable differences between subjects and between year groups. In mathematics, pupils
p.5
Grade: 4
achieved very well and secured results that were as good as the national picture. In English, however, results were below average and the most able pupils underachieved. In science, too few pupils attained the higher levels normally expected of the most able children. Pupils currently in the school are not making sufficient progress in Key Stage 2. Pupils’ reading and writing skills are not developed well enough. Their handwriting is immature; few write consistently in ink with joined-up script. Many are unable to express ideas clearly in speech and do not use the correct register when talking to an adult. Although pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities make satisfactory progress when they are supported in lessons, their overall progress throughout the school is slow.
p.5
Grade: 3
Pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is satisfactory and provides a firm foundation for improving their academic achievement. The high regard many parents have for this is reflected in one parent’s comment: ‘My child has good values and opinions which come 5 of 11 Inspection Report: Carville Primary School, 28 °29 November 2007 partly from the school.’ Pupils enjoy most aspects of school. However, attendance is below average and the school recognises the need to do more to improve this. Pupils’ behaviour is satisfactory. Most are polite and courteous and get on well together, but some complain that a small number occasionally disturb their learning. By and large, pupils move around the school and playground safely and sensibly. They are encouraged to drink water regularly and they know why they should eat fruit and vegetables. They have a sound understanding of healthy lifestyles and enjoy taking part in sport and other physical activities. For example, they attend
p.5
Grade: 3
after-school and lunchtime activities such as football and skipping clubs and know this helps them to keep fit. The work of the school council is understood and valued by pupils. Despite their enthusiasm, it has had limited effect in bringing about some improvements the pupils would like. Although pupils’ basic skills are weak, their personal and social skills provide them with a sound basis for the next stage in their education.
p.6
Grade: 3
The school recognises that in the past some inadequate teaching has been responsible for pupils’ underachievement. It has taken steps to improve the teaching, which, although uneven across the school, is now satisfactory overall. Relationships are good and, in the main, teachers manage behaviour well. They match work fairly accurately to the ability of their pupils although their expectations in some classes are too low. Teaching assistants are well briefed and usually provide valuable support for pupils. They also help the teacher to make sure pupils are making progress when working in small groups, something the teacher does not do very well when there is no assistant. Pupils pay attention well and many contribute to lessons by answering the teacher’s questions. Most pupils are aware of the targets for their class in mathematics and English and try their best to reach them in lessons. In the best lessons the teacher is clear about
p.6
Grade: 3
what pupils are meant to learn and the work is carefully prepared to make sure they achieve what is expected. In some lessons pupils make inadequate progress; some of the teaching is uninspiring, and pupils spend too long sitting and listening; the school’s own survey of pupils indicates that many of them would like lessons to be more exciting.
p.6
Grade: 4
Though inadequate, the curriculum has some strong features. It provides pupils with a variety of experiences which they enjoy. It enables pupils to learn how to stay safe and healthy. Personal, social, health and citizenship education contributes positively to their behaviour, and helps them to work and play happily together. Various schemes are used to give intensive support for particular groups of pupils; additional tuition, for example, provides effective challenge and encouragement for older pupils who have an aptitude for mathematics. The school provides a range of visits and visitors including specialist sports tuition. A satisfactory range of extra-curricular activities, including a residential visit, enriches pupils’ learning. After-school and lunchtime clubs, such as the choir, cookery and football, are popular with pupils, although the school does not monitor how many of them are participating.
p.6
Grade: 4
However, the curriculum has some shortcomings. Although the curriculum is planned with an appropriate emphasis on basic skills, pupils make insufficient progress in speaking and writing. Recent efforts to make work more meaningful and exciting, for example by linking different 6 of 11 Inspection Report: Carville Primary School, 28 °29 November 2007 subjects, have not yet had an impact on pupils’ learning. The curriculum’s main weakness is the lack of opportunities it provides for pupils to develop their skills by writing at length in different subjects. Furthermore, the planning for literacy does not specify exactly what is to be taught and when. As a consequence, pupils are not always working at the right level for their age and ability and do not make sufficient progress.
p.6
Grade: 3
Pupils are well cared for in school. A typical comment from a parent was, ‘Staff are very concerned about the children’s happiness.’ This reflects how effectively the staff create a pleasant and welcoming school that pupils and parents value. Pupils say they feel safe because the staff take care of them. Procedures for protecting and safeguarding pupils are largely secure. Some pupils have concerns about bullying and poor behaviour, but know there are adults they can turn to and that usually it will be dealt with. The school regularly tracks pupils’ progress but does not act early enough to deal with pupils who are falling behind. Pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities and the small number who need help with English as an additional language often benefit from extra help. This ensures that they make progress in lessons. Teachers’ marking is supportive and encouraging. In the best examples it clearly indicates how pupils can improve their work but this practice is not
p.7
Grade: 4
The school’s change to an all-through primary exposed the staff’s lack of understanding at the time of what pupils needed to learn and of the standards they should achieve. This has taken several years to tackle effectively and pupils’ achievement has now started to improve. There is still much to do. Pupils’ progress is too variable. The managers of the school have a satisfactory knowledge of the school’s weaknesses and have laid suitable plans to bring about further improvement, but overall their self-evaluation is insufficiently rigorous. Their monitoring of the school’s work pays little attention to pupils’ learning and does not focus on the effectiveness of the school’s policies. For example, the impact on pupils’ learning of the shared teaching arrangements in two classes has not been assessed. The school’s self-evaluation relies heavily on the work of external partners. The lack of parental involvement with the school is a concern. Managers have introduced a
p.7
Grade: 4
number of new ideas and attendance at parents’ evenings has increased. Otherwise, this initiative has had little impact. Few parents responded to the questionnaire for the inspection but many of those who did felt the school did not listen to their views and concerns. Several staff with management responsibilities are not as involved as they could be in planning to improve the school. Progress on some issues identified by the last inspection has been too slow. There are some encouraging signs. Staff are committed to do their best for their pupils; managers now know what needs to improve; governors have a better grasp than formerly of how to hold the school to account; and action plans are clearly focused on raising standards. Last year brought clear evidence that things were getting better. Consequently, the school has satisfactory capacity for improvement. 7 of 11 Inspection Report: Carville Primary School, 28 °29 November 2007
p.7
Grade: 4
in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 8 of 11 Inspection Report: Carville Primary School, 28 °29 November 2007
p.8
Inspection judgements
School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.9
Overall effectiveness
How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? No Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 4 The effectiveness of the Foundation Stage 3 The capacity to make any necessary improvements
p.9
Achievement and standards
4 How well do learners achieve? 4 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 4 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.9
learners?
3 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 3 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 3 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 3 How well learners enjoy their education 3 The attendance of learners 3 The behaviour of learners 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.9
and interests of learners?
3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.9
and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 9 of 11 Inspection Report: Carville Primary School, 28 °29 November 2007
p.9
and supporting all learners?
How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 3 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 4 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? Yes Does this school require a notice to improve? 10 of 11 Inspection Report: Carville Primary School, 28 °29 November 2007
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
30 November 2007 Dear Pupils Inspection of Carville Primary School, Wallsend, NE28 6AX Thank you for welcoming us so warmly into your school. We enjoyed watching you in lessons and at play, talking about your school with you and your teachers, and looking at your work. Now we want to share with you what we thought. We think that your school has a lot of good things about it. All the staff take very good care of you. You told us that you are made welcome in the school and that you feel safe there. You enjoy lessons and you especially like the additional activities that the school provides for you at lunchtime and at the end of the day. Most of you behave well in class and around the school, you know about the importance of eating and drinking healthily and you play and work nicely with each other. Many of you help with the running of the school, for example by serving on the school council or assisting at the reception desk.
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
We have asked Mrs Moore and the staff to improve some things about the school. In particular, we would like them to help you make the progress you are capable of in English. You will learn to express yourselves better in speech and in writing if you have more opportunities to practise these skills in different subjects. We have asked the people who manage the school to look more closely at how well you are learning, so that they know quickly how to improve things for you. We would like your parents to become more involved in the school. Many of you come to school often and on time, because you know that your lessons are very important, but there are still some pupils who are absent too much. There are lots of things you can do to help the staff make these improvements and I’m sure that some of you will already have lots of good ideas. The school has been given what is called a ‘Notice to Improve,’ because we would like some
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
things to get better quickly. It means that in about a year some other inspectors will come to the school to see if it has improved as much as it should have done. Thank you again for helping us so much with the inspection. It was a pleasure to meet you. Yours sincerely Derek Neil Her Majesty’s Inspector 11 of 11 Inspection Report: Carville Primary School, 28 °29 November 2007
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion