Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Guiseley Primary School

Inspected 18 Mar 2008 · published 23 Apr 2008 · URN 107809

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Roger Gill

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    18 Mar 2008

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Roger Gill

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    LS20 9DA

  • Name on report verified

    Guiseley Infant and Nursery School

  • URN verified

    107809

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+86Very positivemore positive than 99% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexceptionallyoutstandingenjoyeffectivelyimprovingsuccessfulimprovedeffective
Criticisminadequatelowbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1860w+90
  • What needs to improve158w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,993
shorter than usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 49, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
2
typical 8
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 87%What needs to improve 7%About the inspection 5%

Full report text

Guiseley Infant and Nursery School Inspection report

p.1

107809 Unique Reference Number Leeds Local Authority 309508 Inspection number 18 March 2008 Inspection date Roger Gill Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary Type of school Community School category 3 °7 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 256 School The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Knight Chair Mrs Bell Headteacher 27 September 2004 Date of previous school inspection Oxford Road School address Guiseley Leeds West Yorkshire LS20 9DA 01943 873359 Telephone number 01943 873031 Fax number

p.1

3-7 Age group 18 March 2008 Inspection date 309508 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors. The inspector evaluated the overall effectiveness of the school and investigated the following issues: pupils' achievement; the way that leadership and management have improved the quality of teaching; and curriculum provision. Evidence was gathered from: the school's judgements about attainment on entry; test results; teachers' records; observations of teaching; scrutiny of pupils' current work; and discussions with the headteacher, staff, pupils and governors. Other aspects of the school's work were not investigated in detail, but the inspector found no evidence to suggest that the school's own assessments, as given in its self-evaluation, were not justified and these have been included where appropriate in this report.

p.3

Description of the school

This average-sized school is situated in a relatively advantaged area. It has a low proportion of children who receive free school meals, are learning English as an additional language or have a learning difficulty and/or disability. There are more boys in school than girls. Attainment on entry to the Nursery is in line with that expected nationally for the children's age. Since the school was last inspected in September 2004, a new headteacher has been appointed. The headteacher has only worked in post for 18 months owing to extended sick leave. Since September 2007, several new teachers have been appointed after a lengthy period of staffing stability. A Children's Centre is about to open on the school's site; much of the preparation for it has been completed.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 9 Inspection Report: Guiseley Infant and Nursery School, 18 March 2008

p.3

Grade: 3

This is a satisfactory school which is improving quickly, especially now that the headteacher is back in post. It is the headteacher's drive and determination that have galvanised staff and governors in pursuit of better academic achievement. There are good features of the school, notably in pupils' personal development and a recently reinvigorated curriculum. The precise and influential school self-evaluation, a close working relationship with parents and links with the local community help to maintain these good features. Pupils' achievement is satisfactory. Teaching is satisfactory in its overall effect on pupils' progress, but where there are good aspects these are promoting faster progress in some areas of the school. This has been assisted by the appointment and induction of new staff, which has been managed well to capitalise on their fresh ideas. This has helped all staff in speeding up pupils' progress. For example, in Year 2, sharing the purpose of lessons with pupils and

p.4

Grade: 3

encouraging them to judge how well they are doing, is also speeding up their progress. This greater responsibility is making some pupils learn at a faster rate. However, there are some lessons in which pupils are more passive partners in the process of learning because objectives and targets are not discussed often enough. Children enjoy school a lot. They love helping out by being 'playground pals' or school council members, for example. Older pupils are very proud when they eat their lunch in a newly equipped room off the main dining hall, which has been painted with a space theme mural. This makes them feel special, which is a tribute to the sensitive care and support they receive. Learning has recently become more fun because the curriculum has been re-planned to emphasise play and hands-on activities. These changes appeal greatly to boys, but also advantage girls. Children behave sensibly in class and around school, so that they all feel safe. They know all about eating

p.4

Grade: 3

healthily, taking exercise and drinking enough water. Older pupils sound very knowledgeable when talking about these matters. Standards by the end of Year 2 are average in reading, writing and mathematics. The school knows that pupils could reach higher standards; its plans for development are geared towards this end. There are already signs of improvement. Standards are rising in reading owing to the successful implementation of the new national advice of teaching letters and their sounds. In mathematics and writing, some pupils' progress is improving faster than others because teaching in some classes is better at setting them challenging targets through discussion and marking. Elsewhere, pupils have objectives to aim at, but these are not linked closely enough to the criteria which show how pupils could move up to the next level in their learning. As a result, the quality of care, guidance and support is satisfactory overall rather than good, as the general

p.4

Grade: 3

level of care would suggest. Since the last inspection, governors, members of the leadership team and subject leaders have all become far more involved in making plans, improving resources and gathering information about what goes on in the school. They have identified the need to improve the use of that information to evaluate the use of resources and the impact of their plans to raise the levels of pupils' achievement. There has not been time, since the return of the headteacher, to fulfil this ambition; it remains an important area for development. However, the improvements in reading; the curriculum; teaching in some classes; and in shared leadership all demonstrate the school's good capacity to continue with its improvements. The prevailing opinion among parents is that this is a successful school, which is improving all the time. A typical comment such as, 4 of 9 Inspection Report: Guiseley Infant and Nursery School, 18 March 2008

p.4

Grade: 3

'The school fosters an atmosphere where children are valued and learn to value others,' demonstrates how the school is well regarded in the community.

p.5

Grade: 3

Children make satisfactory progress and attain in line with national expectations at the end of their Reception year. This sound achievement is beginning to improve due to changes put in place this year. Sound leadership from the deputy headteacher is beginning to make a difference to the organisation and management of learning. The provision for outside play in the Nursery, for example, has become more demanding on children's physical skills and their imaginations. Staff work closely with parents to devise an appropriate programme of activities for children. Sound teaching is being improved to include more frequent direct teaching of children individually and in small groups. Teaching is now satisfactory with good features in these respects. The assessment of children's learning is adequate but the school knows that not enough close observation of learning takes place. However, staff are already working hard to

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

■ Increase pupils' rate of progress and raise standards, particularly in writing and mathematics to match the current progress in reading. ■ Improve teachers' marking and target setting to make all pupils more aware of, and involved in, their next steps in learning. ■ Develop the responsibility for evaluating pupils' learning and the work of the school in governors, the leadership team and subject leaders. A small proportion of the schools whose overall performance is judged satisfactory but which have areas of underperformance will receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted Inspector before their next section 5 inspection. 5 of 9 Inspection Report: Guiseley Infant and Nursery School, 18 March 2008 .

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 of 9 Inspection Report: Guiseley Infant and Nursery School, 18 March 2008

p.6

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.7

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 3 The effectiveness of the Foundation Stage 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.7

Achievement and standards

3 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.7

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 How well learners enjoy their education 3 The attendance of learners 2 The behaviour of learners 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.7

and interests of learners?

3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.7

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 of 9 Inspection Report: Guiseley Infant and Nursery School, 18 March 2008

p.7

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 3 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 of 9 Inspection Report: Guiseley Infant and Nursery School, 18 March 2008

p.8

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Inspection of Guiseley Infant and Nursery School, Leeds, LS20 9DA Thank you for your help when inspectors visited your school. We thoroughly enjoyed our day with you all. You go to a satisfactory school, but one that is improving fast. It is obvious how much you enjoy school, because the children who spoke to us were brimming over with stories about the school council, playground pals and the way adults are so kind and helpful. We also thought the children who talked to us about their learning were very confident - well done to you all. You find lessons interesting and we saw several that we particularly enjoyed. For example, the lively phonics lessons in Year 1, the history lesson in Year 2 in which children were sketching old objects and the Easter egg hunt in Reception. The best bits were when teachers explained what the lesson was about and then, later, got you to talk about how well you were doing.

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Your headteacher is eager to make Guiseley Infant and Nursery School a good or outstanding one. She knows what needs to be done and she has made sure that all the adults do so as well. We know that your parents are pleased with the school. They realise that things are getting better quickly. I am suggesting three things for your school to do, so that it can become even better. Your teachers should help you to improve what you can do by the end of Year 2, particularly in writing and mathematics because your reading is already coming on well due to the new phonics lessons. Also, your teachers need to find more ways to make sure you all know how well you have done in your learning and what you need to do next. Lastly, your teachers and governors need to take a more active part in finding out how well you are doing and what needs to be improved. Then they can all help your headteacher see whether you and the school have done

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

as well as possible by the end of each year. 9 of 9 Inspection Report: Guiseley Infant and Nursery School, 18 March 2008

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion