Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Foxhill Primary School

Inspected 10 Apr 2008 · published 29 Apr 2008 · URN 107432

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    10 Apr 2008

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Roger Gill

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    BD13 1LN

  • Name on report verified

    Foxhill Primary School

  • URN verified

    107432

Page 2 of 9
Page 2 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+71Very positivemore positive than 25% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingexceptionallyvery welleffectivelystrongeffectivehigh qualityproud
Criticisminadequatebelowweaknessnot outstandinglacknot yetabsencelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1959w+74
  • What needs to improve100w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,036
shorter than usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 47
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
3
typical 8
Hedged sentences
13%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 90%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 6%

Full report text

Foxhill Primary School Inspection report

p.1

107432 Unique Reference Number Bradford Local Authority 309398 Inspection number 10 April 2008 Inspection date Roger Gill Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary Type of school Foundation School category 3 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 230 School The governing body Appropriate authority Mr K Jenkinson Chair Mrs A Bleasdale Headteacher 2 February 2004 Date of previous school inspection Brighouse and Denholme Road School address Queensbury Bradford West Yorkshire BD13 1LN 01274 882426 Telephone number 01274 882106 Fax number

p.1

3-11 Age group 10 April 2008 Inspection date 309398 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by one Additional Inspector. The inspector evaluated the overall effectiveness of the school and investigated the following issues: pupils' achievement; the quality of teaching throughout the school but particularly in Years 3 to 6; and pupils' achievements in writing by the end of Year 6. Evidence was gathered from the school's judgements about attainment on entry, test results, teachers' records, observations of teaching, scrutiny of pupils' current work and discussions with the headteacher, staff, pupils and governors. Other aspects of the school's work were not investigated in detail, but the inspector found no evidence to suggest that the school's own assessments, as given in its self- evaluation, were not justified and these have been included where appropriate in this report.

p.3

Description of the school

This is an average-sized school situated in a relatively advantaged area on the northern outskirts of Bradford. Most pupils come from the immediate area, but a sizeable minority travel from further afield. Almost all pupils are White British; those who are not speak English well. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties is below average. There is a small group with particular difficulties and/or disabilities. Children's attainment on entry to the Foundation Stage is typical for their age. The school does not seek national awards, but makes sure that it meets the criteria for the national Healthy School Award.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 9 Inspection Report: Foxhill Primary School, 10 April 2008

p.3

Grade: 2

This is a good school with some outstanding features. It is not yet outstanding overall because in Key Stage 2 progress in writing is satisfactory rather than good. Nevertheless, this aspect is beginning to improve as a result of the dedicated drive to raise standards. Everyone connected with the school - parents, pupils, staff and governors - are justified in feeling proud of its successes. The first-rate support that is provided for pupils' personal development and well-being creates very well balanced and confident young people. Pupils on the school council are strong advocates for the school: asked to mark it out of ten, almost in unison, they respond with, 'eleven.' In conversation about the school's merits, pupils show their talent for communication. They readily list their love of learning, knowledge about keeping healthy and safe, the absence of bullying, the school's two large choirs and its strong emphasis

p.4

Grade: 2

on drama as key features behind their success. This positive view of the school is endorsed by inspection findings. Furthermore, a typical opinion from parents points to a school with 'a great ethos, which encourages children to express themselves in so many ways: choir, drama and art'. All this is achieved through some talented teaching in the creative arts, rigorous systems for care and magnificent opportunities to sing publicly and create top quality plays. Standards at the end of Year 6 are above average and pupils' overall achievement is good. This reflects good improvement since the last inspection. Gains have been quicker in mathematics and science than in English where pupils' progress in writing has lagged behind that of other areas. The school has tackled this relative weakness by putting in place methods designed to strengthen pupils' sentence construction, use of vocabulary and punctuation. As a result, current

p.4

Grade: 2

progress in writing at Year 6 is good and pupils are on course to reach some ambitious targets. It is in Years 3 to 5 that progress in writing is no better than satisfactory, limiting pupils attaining consistently above average standards by the end of Year 6. Despite the issues related to writing, some groups of pupils are learning quickly such as those with specific difficulties and/or disabilities. The school's care and support for these pupils elicits comments from parents like, 'we cannot thank the school enough.' This is due to the rigour shown in identifying how best to help them, the planning of useful programmes to meet their needs and extremely effective links with outside agencies. The headteacher, leadership team and governing body know the school exceptionally well. They possess a wealth of experience with which to steer the school through challenging periods. There was a time, since the last inspection, when staffing difficulties combined with a spate of

p.4

Grade: 2

temporary teaching caused a lack of momentum and low achievement among older pupils. This has now been addressed. The sense of direction, teamwork and commitment to making Foxhill a very successful school are most apparent. To this end, the school has recently tried to improve the degree in which pupils understand what they are aiming for in lessons and how to achieve any targets they may be set. The system is a good one in terms of guidance for academic success. Some pupils are racing ahead in this respect. For example, in Year 2, the 'Doctor Who and the Dalek' theme not only enthrals pupils but links targets to the work very effectively to help them improve. Equally, in Year 6, pupils are motivated enormously by high expectations established through teaching, as well as the improvement targets they set themselves when evaluating their own and each other's work. However, throughout the school, not all pupils

p.4

Grade: 2

enjoy the same level of involvement: some are unsure of their next steps because targets set in marking, for example, are too general or vague. 4 of 9 Inspection Report: Foxhill Primary School, 10 April 2008 The school has progressed well since its last inspection in 2004 when it was judged as satisfactory. Teaching, the curriculum and leadership and management are all good now. Governors have undertaken valuable training and are now good at asking the right questions to spur the school on. The progress made to date, including the outstanding features, demonstrates a capacity to continue moving forward and good value for money.

p.4

Grade: 2

The Foundation Stage gives children a good start. They attain slightly above nationally expected levels by the end of Reception after a broadly typical start. They make especially good progress in their communication skills and emotional development, which are often below the levels expected nationally for their age when they first start. Thus, progress and achievement are good. Since the last inspection, good leadership and management has created a Foundation Stage unit in which Nursery and Reception children learn alongside each other in a high quality setting that accentuates play and investigation. For example, at any one moment, some children may be dressed up at the mini-beasts safari lookout post using binoculars to spot the creatures, while others are panning through soil, seeking plastic mini-beasts. Others talk fervently with adults about the mathematics behind doubling numbers. The unit is a hive of activity in which

p.5

Grade: 2

children experience a beneficial and exciting curriculum. In response to the stimulating activities, children behave very well and are highly motivated. Typically, as staff are proud to note, children say things like, 'I have tried really hard and this is my best work.' The school has rightly judged outdoor provision as satisfactory, but staff are working hard to improve this.

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

■ Improve progress in writing within Key Stage 2 so that standards in this aspect of English, by the end of Year 6, are above average. ■ Ensure that all pupils understand their targets and can judge the progress they are making towards them. 5 of 9 Inspection Report: Foxhill Primary School, 10 April 2008 .

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 of 9 Inspection Report: Foxhill Primary School, 10 April 2008

p.6

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.7

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The effectiveness of the Foundation Stage 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.7

Achievement and standards

2 How well do learners achieve? 2 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.7

learners?

1 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 1 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 1 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 1 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The attendance of learners 1 The behaviour of learners 1 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.7

and interests of learners?

1 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.7

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 of 9 Inspection Report: Foxhill Primary School, 10 April 2008

p.7

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 2 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 1 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 of 9 Inspection Report: Foxhill Primary School, 10 April 2008

p.8

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Thank you for your help when I inspected your school. I thoroughly enjoyed my visit because everyone was so friendly. You go to a good school, which is outstanding in some respects. The children who spoke to me at break and lunchtime convinced me that some things about Foxhill are really special. I cannot remember when I last visited a school with such a large number of pupils in the school choirs. Not only that, you are so successful. While I was with you, the local newspaper had a big story about your singing at Bradford University. Furthermore, the fantastic opportunity to do drama regularly to such a high standard has an enormous influence on your confidence and ability to relate to others. I well remember asking the school council what they thought of the school and then not speaking much for 20 minutes while they told me. I enjoyed myself in every part of the school from witnessing the 'whoops of joy' in

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Foundation Stage when children spotted a woodlouse, to seeing Year 6 pupils write bold, complex sentences with powerful opening clauses. The children that I spoke to at morning break told me how much you all care about good behaviour and helping out in the school. The list of ways in which you can contribute is a long one, for example: various monitors; reading partners; school council; pen pals with children in Prague; choir members; and assistants in the 'play in a day' scheme. I am suggesting two things for the school to do to become even better. Firstly, to increase the rate of progress you make in writing in Key Stage 2. Secondly, to involve you all far more in thinking about how well you are doing in your learning. You can all help by trying hard to improve your sentences, vocabulary and punctuation. Also, by making sure that you know exactly what targets you are aiming at and how close you are to reaching them.

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Best wishes to you all and I look forward to seeing some of you singing or acting on the stage in London in years to come. 9 of 9 Inspection Report: Foxhill Primary School, 10 April 2008

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion