Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Saint Pius X Catholic High School A Specialist School in Humanities

Inspected 28 Sept 2007 · published 17 Oct 2007 · URN 106962

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    28 Sept 2007

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Young

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    S63 7PQ

  • Name on report verified

    Pope Pius X Catholic High School

  • URN verified

    106962

Page 1 of 10
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+72Very positivemore positive than 25% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexcellenteffectivepositiveeffectivelyexceptionallystrongoutstandingenjoy
Criticisminconsistenciesinadequatebelowdisruptinconsistencyconcernsmissedlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings2516w+77
  • What needs to improve117w−56

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
10
Words of findings
2,600
about usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 47
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
2
typical 8
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 91%What needs to improve 4%About the inspection 5%

Full report text

Pope Pius X Catholic High School Inspection report

p.1

106962 Unique Reference Number Rotherham Local Authority 309275 Inspection number 28 September 2007 Inspection date John Young HMI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Secondary Type of school Voluntary aided School category 11 °16 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 679 School The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Malcolm Dainty Chair Mrs Anne Winfield Headteacher 3 November 2003 Date of previous school inspection Wath Wood Road School address Wath-upon-Dearne Rotherham South Yorkshire S63 7PQ 01709 767900 Telephone number 01709 875106 Fax number

p.1

11-16 Age group 28 September 2007 Inspection date 309275 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty's Inspectors. The inspector evaluated the overall effectiveness of the school and investigated the following issues: the achievement of students and the progress they make, particularly in Key Stage 3, and amongst the more able students; the impact of leadership and management on addressing areas for improvement from the last inspection; the curriculum, students' personal development, well-being, and their care, guidance and support. Evidence was gathered from the school's self-evaluation, national published assessment data and the school's own assessment records, policies and minutes, observation of the school at work, interviews with members of staff, students and governors, and the parents' questionnaires. Other aspects of the school's work, including the impact of the school's newly acquired specialist status, the work of the internal exclusion unit, and the

p.3

Introduction

partnerships the school has established to maximise opportunities for its students, were not investigated in detail. However, the inspector found no evidence to suggest that the school's own assessments, as given in its self-evaluation, were not justified, and these have been included where appropriate in this report.

p.3

Description of the school

The school draws students from a wide area, including Rotherham, Doncaster, and Barnsley. Some of these areas contain pockets of significant social and economic deprivation, although the proportion of students known to be eligible for free school meals is lower than the national average. The school's student population is predominantly of White British heritage and the remainder are from a range of minority and mixed ethnic backgrounds. Very few students are at an early stage of learning English. The proportion of students with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is above the national average. Students' standards are currently broadly average on entry. The school gained specialist Humanities status in September 2007, and has Investors in People accreditation.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 10 Inspection Report: Pope Pius X Catholic High School, 28 September 2007

p.3

Grade: 2

This good school provides good value for money. It has taken a number of effective steps to improve itself since its last inspection. The school has a strong Christian ethos and is popular, with more requests for places than it can accommodate. The headteacher, who has excellent interpersonal skills, has been very successful in rallying the support of staff and helping them to recognise what they and the students are truly capable of. Morale is high and there is a strong sense of collective responsibility. A coherent improvement strategy has been the cornerstone of a systematic reorganisation of the way the school operates. This has brought about progress in almost every aspect of the school's work. Equally important has been the culture shift, with an emphasis on empowering staff, and giving them more autonomy. The school's improved use of monitoring, evaluation and assessment to support learning is bearing

p.4

Grade: 2

fruit. The school's specialist status has only just become operational. However, the specialist subjects are amongst the highest performing areas in the school and have begun to model best practice in a number of areas. In addition, the heads of specialist subjects are designated 'lead learners' in the school and have been trained to coach and mentor staff, including new middle leaders. Students' achievement is good, when set against their standards at entry, which were below average. Following disappointing results at Key Stage 3 in 2006 in all subjects, the 2007 results were more positive. Students' standards in English and science were above average, while they were below average in mathematics. However, the school did not meet any of its subject targets for the proportion of students reaching the highest levels. At Key Stage 4 in 2006, the proportion of students gaining five or more A* to G grades and five or more A* to C grades including

p.4

Grade: 2

mathematics and English was higher than the national average. Data which tracks students' progress throughout their time at school showed that they made significantly above average progress in 2006. Provisional results for 2007 show some slippage, although performance is broadly in line with national averages. Results in mathematics were particularly disappointing, as was the proportion of more able students achieving the highest grades. Nevertheless, the gap between girls' and boys' standards closed, and students with learning difficulties and/or disabilities made progress in line with their peers. The school is having a good impact on developing students' personal development and well-being and in educating them about their rights and responsibilities. Students say they really enjoy coming to school, feel safe and take an active role in school life. They readily adopt leadership roles as prefects, serve on the school council, and mentor younger students. There

p.4

Grade: 2

is good promotion of healthy lifestyles through an integrated personal social, health, and citizenship programme, which complements provision in science and physical education. In addition, the school has ensured food served in the canteen meets national food standards. Students' good spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is also reflected in the positive contributions they make to the school and local community, including undertaking charity work and embarking on religious retreats and residential experiences. Students develop positive relationships with their peers and staff, are well behaved and attend regularly. The school prepares students well for life beyond school and this is reflected in the very high proportion of students who go on to further education, employment, or training. The quality of teaching and learning is satisfactory. Although some teaching is excellent, there is a gulf between the best and least effective practice in the school. Evidence from lessons seen

p.4

Grade: 2

and the school's own monitoring of the quality of teaching and learning confirm that in the 4 of 10 Inspection Report: Pope Pius X Catholic High School, 28 September 2007 best lessons students make rapid progress, because the teaching is highly focused, well planned, engaging, and challenging. Staff use monitoring and evaluation data intelligently to match the degree of challenge to students' capabilities, and raise students' awareness of their targets and how to improve further. Teachers positively reinforce the efforts of students, who in turn have high aspirations for themselves. Learning mentors and teaching assistants are used effectively to support students' learning, particularly vulnerable students and those with additional needs. However, despite the early developments evident through the specialist subjects, there are missed opportunities to share best practice and remove the inconsistencies

p.4

Grade: 2

that exist in the quality of teaching and learning, lesson planning, and marking within the school. A minority of students arrive late to lessons following break, and this can disrupt the start to lessons and rob staff of valuable teaching time. Curricular provision is good. In recent years, it has evolved to better suit the needs and interests of all students. This is particularly true of the Key Stage 4 curriculum, which features a pathways model. It provides a balance between traditionally academic, vocational, and work-based learning opportunities. All students undertake work experience. The 'Pathfinder' option allows more vulnerable students to access a mix of literacy, numeracy and basic skills accreditation, with extended work experience placements in the local community. A collaborative agreement amongst a group of local schools has expanded what the school is able to offer to students. There are good enrichment opportunities for students, including residential activities, religious

p.5

Grade: 2

retreats, study clubs, and an award-winning choir. In addition, students participate in sport, foreign exchange visits, and drama activities. Students who are more able benefit from fast tracking, which allows them to take their exams a year early. A range of business and enterprise activities are organised through the school's good links with local partners. Students receive good quality careers advice, support, and guidance. The quality of care, guidance, and support provided to students is good. This caring school works proactively with a range of partners to support the development of all the students. Child protection procedures are robust and appropriate risk assessments are undertaken. Staff know the students very well and this helps them to nurture strong relationships with students, who feel secure in the school. Students value the school's caring ethos and act responsibly; as a result, rates of exclusion are very low. In extreme cases, an internal exclusion room is used.

p.5

Grade: 2

Here, students are given time to reflect on their actions before being reintegrated back into normal classes. Academic and pastoral guidance are strong overall and academic mentoring and pastoral structures are well established. Students benefit from clear and consistent arrangements to assess, track, and re-evaluate targets based upon effective use of the available data. Transition arrangements as students enter and move through and beyond the school are effective. Students receive high quality guidance and support both from staff and a range of external agencies, and consequently make good progress. The school makes consistent efforts to engage and work with parents and carers, in order to improve parents' and carers' ability to support their child's learning and development. The headteacher has systematically built a team of highly effective leaders and managers at all levels of the school. They work well together and have complementary skills. She has provided

p.5

Grade: 2

very clear educational direction. A coherent monitoring and evaluation system is helping the school to improve. It has not become complacent with its success and is constantly assessing and refining its practice; this has ensured that there is very good capacity across the school to continue to improve further. It is very aware of its strengths and areas for development, and has a well-conceived improvement plan to improve the overall quality of provision. The school has successfully addressed areas for development highlighted by the last inspection. Good 5 of 10 Inspection Report: Pope Pius X Catholic High School, 28 September 2007 progress has been made in developing the quality of accommodation, and achievement has been raised, while unsatisfactory teaching has been eliminated. The school works effectively with a host of partners to boost the quality of education it provides to students. Although most

p.5

Grade: 2

parents are very positive about the school, some are concerned that the school does not seek or consider their views enough. Governors are supportive of the school but can also pose challenging questions. They discharge their duties well and hold the school to account.

p.6

What the school should do to improve further

■ Raise achievement, particularly in mathematics at Key Stages 3 and 4, and amongst the most able students. ■ Remove the inconsistencies that exist in the quality of teaching and learning, planning and marking across the school. ■ Improve parental perceptions of the extent to which the school seeks and takes account of their views. 6 of 10 Inspection Report: Pope Pius X Catholic High School, 28 September 2007 .

p.6

What the school should do to improve further

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 7 of 10 Inspection Report: Pope Pius X Catholic High School, 28 September 2007

p.7

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.8

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.8

Achievement and standards

2 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.8

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The attendance of learners 2 The behaviour of learners 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.8

and interests of learners?

2 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.8

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 8 of 10 Inspection Report: Pope Pius X Catholic High School, 28 September 2007

p.8

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 2 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 9 of 10 Inspection Report: Pope Pius X Catholic High School, 28 September 2007

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Inspection of Saint Pius X Catholic High School, Rotherham, S63 7PQ Thank you for talking to me and making me so welcome during my recent inspection visit. I saw some of your lessons, spoke to some of you, looked at your work, and read the results of questionnaires completed by you and your parents/carers. They proved to be very helpful. Here is a summary of my main findings, which I hope will be of interest to you.

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ The quality of education you receive is good. Most of you make good progress relative to your attainment on entry to the school. Standards are average overall, although the results recently attained in English and science at the end of Key Stage 3 are above average. You are set realistic and challenging targets. Nevertheless, there is room for further improvement in a number of key areas. ■ You enjoy coming to school, are well behaved, and attend regularly, although some of you do not arrive punctually to your lessons. Some of the teaching you receive is excellent and in these lessons, you make outstanding progress. However, there is too much inconsistency in the quality of teaching and learning, lesson planning and marking to make it good overall and I have asked the school to tackle this. ■ The curriculum is good and is supplemented by a wide-ranging extra-curricular programme. Your personal development is good. You take leadership roles and involve yourselves selflessly

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

in the school and wider community. You are learning skills that equip you well for life beyond the school, and the majority of students have gone on to further education, employment, or training. Most of you feel safe and know who to turn to if you have any concerns. The academic and pastoral guidance you receive is good, and you value the school's caring ethos. I have asked the school to raise your achievement: particularly in mathematics at Key Stages 3 and 4, and amongst those of you who are the most able. I have also asked that staff work to remove the inconsistencies that exist in the quality of teaching and learning, planning and marking. In addition, the school needs to improve parental perceptions of the extent to which it seeks and takes account of their views. I hope you will support staff in their efforts to bring about these improvements. 10 of 10 Inspection Report: Pope Pius X Catholic High School, 28 September 2007

p.10

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion