Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
Bedford Drive Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
24 Apr 2008
- Inspectorssingle source
Derek Aitken
- Achievement verified
Satisfactory
- Care guidance support verified
Satisfactory
- Curriculum verified
Good
- Leadership and management verified
Satisfactory
- Overall effectiveness verified
Satisfactory
- Personal development verified
Good
- Teaching and learning verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
CH42 6RT
- Name on report verified
Bedford Drive Primary School
- URN verified
104988
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallSatisfactory
- AchievementSatisfactory
- Care guidance supportSatisfactory
- CurriculumGood
- Leadership and managementSatisfactory
- Personal developmentGood
- Teaching and learningSatisfactory
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 8 of 10 Inspection Report: Bedford Drive Primary School, 23 °24 April 2008 p.8
- The good quality of the school's arrangements to ensure pupils feel settled, secure and happy is reflected in their personal development and well-being, which are good. p.4
- Children's learning is well planned, with a clear emphasis each day on a separate area of learning while maintaining a common element of personal, social and emotional development throughout the week. p.4
- As a result, you feel safe and happy at school. p.10
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- A small proportion of the schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory but which have areas of underperformance will receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection. p.5
- Results at the end of Year 2 are invariably below average, but they declined in 2007, especially in reading. p.5
- School leaders identified this weakness and have acted robustly both to support the current Year 3 pupils and to ensure improved standards in the current Year 2. p.5
- Results at the end of Year 6, while remaining below average, have been improving steadily and this trend is being maintained in the current Year 6. p.5
- There is, however, some variation in attainment and achievement between the subjects. p.5
- Progress in science and, to a lesser extent, in English, is better than in mathematics, where pupils display some uncertainty in mental calculations. p.5
- Standards in science are higher because very successful action has been taken to improve pupils' investigative skills. p.5
- Pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities made unsatisfactory progress in the last two years. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 10
- Words of findings
- 2,613
- about usual (typical 2839)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Bedford Drive Primary School Inspection report
p.1
104988 Unique Reference Number Wirral Local Authority 308728 Inspection number 23 °24 April 2008 Inspection dates Derek Aitken Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Primary Type of school Community School category 3 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 379 School The governing body Appropriate authority Mr S Preston Chair Mrs E Mullens Headteacher 18 April 2005 Date of previous school inspection Bedford Drive School address Rock Ferry Birkenhead Merseyside CH42 6RT 0151 645 1561 Telephone number 0151 644 1466 Fax number
p.1
3-11 Age group 23 °24 April 2008 Inspection dates 308728 Inspection number .
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by three Additional Inspectors.
p.3
Description of the school
This is a large school, situated to the south of Birkenhead. The proportion of pupils eligible for free school meals is well above average. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is above average. The vast majority of pupils are of White British heritage. In the last year the school has gained the National Healthy Schools Award and the Activemark Award. Four of the staff, two with leadership responsibilities and including the new headteacher, are currently on maternity leave. Other colleagues have just returned from maternity leave. The deputy headteacher is currently acting as headteacher.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 10 Inspection Report: Bedford Drive Primary School, 23 °24 April 2008
p.3
Grade: 3
This is a satisfactory school. It works hard to meet the diverse pastoral needs of its pupils. The good quality of the school's arrangements to ensure pupils feel settled, secure and happy is reflected in their personal development and well-being, which are good. By the end of Year 6, standards are below average. Pupils achieve well in most aspects of their learning in the Foundation Stage and satisfactorily in Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2. In Key Stage 2, pupils make good progress in science where they achieve broadly average standards. Progress in English is satisfactory. Achievement in mathematics, however, is barely adequate because the subject has not benefited from the same consistent quality of development. The curriculum makes a good contribution to pupils' all-round education. It supports their personal well-being very effectively. The school has made good use of partnerships to raise pupils' awareness and practice of healthy lifestyles. This is reflected in the school's recent
p.4
Grade: 3
awards. The school has successful systems for promoting pupils' welfare. The code of conduct is consistently applied, and there are several incentives for encouraging appropriate behaviour. The well established SEAL (Social and Emotional Aspects of Learning) programme provides ample opportunities for pupils to reflect and consider the feelings of others. The curriculum is having an increasingly beneficial impact on the quality of pupils' academic work, for example in information and communication technology (ICT). The large variety of physical and sporting activities is popular with the pupils. The quality of teaching is satisfactory. While some of the teaching is good, the overall quality is not consistent enough to ensure that pupils make good, rather than satisfactory progress. Teachers have good subject knowledge and manage pupils well, but occasional weaknesses in the use of personal targets hold back pupils' progress.
p.4
Grade: 3
The school is managing its complex staffing situation well through the creation of small teams to share the responsibility for overseeing pupils' progress. Managers are doing their best to ensure that the school does not stand still during this transitional period. Senior leaders have a good awareness of the strengths and areas for development in the school as demonstrated in their accurate self-evaluation. The school has made satisfactory improvement since its previous inspection. It has satisfactory capacity for further improvement and offers satisfactory value for money.
p.4
Grade: 2
Children join the Nursery with knowledge and skills that are well below those that are expected for their age, particularly in their personal, social and literacy development. They make good progress to reach levels which are, nevertheless, still below those expected when they join Year 1. Good induction procedures ensure that children settle happily into school, develop positive attitudes to learning and quickly acquire independence. Children's learning is well planned, with a clear emphasis each day on a separate area of learning while maintaining a common element of personal, social and emotional development throughout the week. Good use is made of the outside facilities to develop children's skills, but physical constraints mean that this quality of continuous provision is currently compromised for children in Reception. Good teaching lies at the heart of children's good progress. This is supported by well established
p.4
Grade: 2
assessment systems, which ensure that each child's needs are carefully considered in lesson planning. The Foundation Stage is led and managed well. 4 of 10 Inspection Report: Bedford Drive Primary School, 23 °24 April 2008
p.4
What the school should do to improve further
■ Improve standards and achievement, especially in mathematics.
p.5
What the school should do to improve further
■ Ensure teaching and learning are of consistently good quality.
p.5
What the school should do to improve further
■ Make better use of targets to boost pupils' achievement.
p.5
What the school should do to improve further
A small proportion of the schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory but which have areas of underperformance will receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.
p.5
Grade: 3
Results at the end of Year 2 are invariably below average, but they declined in 2007, especially in reading. School leaders identified this weakness and have acted robustly both to support the current Year 3 pupils and to ensure improved standards in the current Year 2. Results at the end of Year 6, while remaining below average, have been improving steadily and this trend is being maintained in the current Year 6. There is, however, some variation in attainment and achievement between the subjects. Progress in science and, to a lesser extent, in English, is better than in mathematics, where pupils display some uncertainty in mental calculations. Standards in science are higher because very successful action has been taken to improve pupils' investigative skills. Pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities made unsatisfactory progress in the last two years. Recent measures are proving successful in ensuring these pupils
p.5
Grade: 3
progress at the same satisfactory rate as their peers.
p.5
Grade: 2
Pupils' moral and social development is especially strong. Awareness of other cultures is successfully fostered, for example through project work on Indian villages. The school is an ordered community. Pupils behave well, and the vast majority conduct themselves very sensibly. They are polite and welcoming. Pupils support each other well both at play and in lessons. Most have good attitudes to learning and this is shown in the care they take in presenting their work. Pupils enjoy practical work and active methods of learning, but their concentration and enthusiasm sometimes flag when teaching does not directly engage them. Attendance has improved steadily and is now satisfactory. Pupils make good use of the many opportunities for them to take on responsibilities, for example through the school council, as play leaders and as class monitors. Their limited literacy and numeracy skills mean that their preparation for the
p.5
Grade: 2
next stage in their education is no more than satisfactory.
p.5
Grade: 3
When teaching is good, pupils are made clearly aware of the new knowledge and skills they are expected to acquire, and lessons are carefully planned to meet the needs of all pupils. On these occasions, teachers use assessment purposefully to keep a regular check on pupils' understanding and the pace of learning is brisk. Common strengths of the teaching are good relationships and the competent subject knowledge teachers demonstrate. Sometimes, however, there is not enough variety in lesson planning and questioning techniques. In these weaker lessons, 5 of 10 Inspection Report: Bedford Drive Primary School, 23 °24 April 2008 insufficient use is made of assessment, including at the end of lessons, to clarify what pupils have learnt. When this happens, the attention of some pupils is inclined to wander and learning slows. Marking is regular and provides good encouragement for pupils to sustain their efforts,
p.5
Grade: 3
but it is not tied in tightly to the targets pupils have to promote their involvement in their learning. This reduces the opportunities pupils have to contribute directly to their own progress.
p.6
Grade: 2
The curriculum makes a good contribution to pupils' personal development and well-being, and is now starting to support pupils' academic achievement well. It is well planned with an appropriate emphasis on developing pupils' basic skills, especially in literacy. ICT is purposefully linked to pupils' work in other subjects and there are some imaginative links between design and technology and geography; and between art and English. A good example of the latter is the 'Silver' project on the poet Walter de la Mare. These projects offer good opportunities to widen pupils' understanding and encourage them to pursue their learning at home. The school is now focusing more sharply on adapting the curriculum to cater for pupils who require extra help in their learning. There are early signs of positive impact in the improved progress of pupils at risk of underachieving and those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities.
p.6
Grade: 3
Systems to ensure pupils' welfare, health and safety are good and procedures are consistently applied which enhance pupils' sense of security. Child protection and other arrangements for safeguarding pupils are in place. Pupils report that bullying and harassment are rare. They feel confident that they can approach any of the staff if they are troubled. There are good links with outside agencies, both informal and informal, several of which have been effectively cultivated by the family support worker. The school works hard to engage parents to support their children's learning. Outcomes are mixed but strategies to improve pupils' attendance are proving increasingly successful. Academic guidance is satisfactory. An improved tracking system is proving its worth in improving the achievement of some pupils. However, the use of pupils' personal targets to accelerate their progress is underdeveloped.
p.6
Grade: 3
Leadership and management are satisfactory. A positive outlook and a willingness on the part of staff to adapt to change and new responsibilities have been key factors in ensuring that the current discontinuity in leadership has not had a negative impact on the pupils' quality of education. The current arrangements, some of which are of a temporary nature, have been very capably led and managed by the deputy headteacher. Senior leaders have a very clear view of main priorities and this is reflected in the school development plan which charts a precise course for the future of the school. Several middle leaders are new to their posts and as a result, there are some inconsistencies in the current quality of monitoring of teaching and learning within subjects. Lesson observations undertaken by senior leaders are detailed. Pupils are meeting their targets, but the school is in the early stages of raising the bar to make them more
p.6
Grade: 3
challenging. Governance is satisfactory; governors support the work of the school effectively. 6 of 10 Inspection Report: Bedford Drive Primary School, 23 °24 April 2008 .
p.6
Grade: 3
in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 7 of 10 Inspection Report: Bedford Drive Primary School, 23 °24 April 2008
p.7
Inspection judgements
School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.8
Overall effectiveness
How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The effectiveness of the Foundation Stage 3 The capacity to make any necessary improvements
p.8
Achievement and standards
3 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.8
learners?
2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 3 How well learners enjoy their education 3 The attendance of learners 2 The behaviour of learners 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.8
and interests of learners?
3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.8
and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 8 of 10 Inspection Report: Bedford Drive Primary School, 23 °24 April 2008
p.8
and supporting all learners?
How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 3 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 9 of 10 Inspection Report: Bedford Drive Primary School, 23 °24 April 2008
p.9
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
Inspection of Bedford Drive Primary School, Birkenhead, CH42 6RT I am writing to thank you for your help when my colleagues and I visited your school recently and to tell you about our inspection findings. Yours is a satisfactory school. It makes sure your personal development is good. You told us how much you enjoyed activities such as sport. You also pointed out that the staff were very fair in the way they insisted on good behaviour and the little things they did to encourage this. As a result, you feel safe and happy at school. We judge that the children in the Foundation Stage get off to a good start in their learning and make good progress. Pupils in Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2 make satisfactory progress, but there are some differences in the development of your skills between subjects. You do well in science, because you learn how to apply investigative skills carefully, but you are less sure
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
in mathematics, for example while trying to do mental calculations. The staff are looking more sharply at supporting the pupils who need extra help with their work and their efforts are starting to pay off as these pupils are now making the progress they need to keep up with the others. The standards of pupils in Year 6 have steadily improved in the last few years, but you have still some way to go to catch up with pupils of your age in other primary schools. We have asked the acting headteacher and her staff to concentrate on three things. The first is to work to close this gap, especially in mathematics. The second is to ensure that the teaching is consistently good in all lessons. Finally, we have asked them to make smarter use of targets to get you more involved in improving your work. It may be a coincidence, but the rise in standards I mentioned above has happened at the same time as your attendance has improved. Keep this up!
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
10 of 10 Inspection Report: Bedford Drive Primary School, 23 °24 April 2008
p.10
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion