Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Yorkmead Junior and Infant School

Inspected 18 Jan 2008 · published 29 Feb 2008 · URN 103284

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Andrew Mcdowall

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    18 Jan 2008

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Andrew McDowall

  • Achievement verified

    Inadequate

  • Care guidance support verified

    Inadequate

  • Curriculum verified

    Inadequate

  • Leadership and management verified

    Inadequate

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Good

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    B28 8BB

  • Name on report verified

    Yorkmead Junior and Infant School

  • URN verified

    103284

Page 1 of 12
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • AchievementInadequate
  • Care guidance supportInadequate
  • CurriculumInadequate
  • Leadership and managementInadequate
  • Personal developmentGood
  • Teaching and learningInadequate

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−39Criticalmore positive than 5% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseenjoyexceptionallyfeel safepositiveeffectivelyhigh expectationsoutstandingsecure
Criticisminadequateweaknessesvariableweakworryingbelowinsufficientnot always

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings2228w−26
  • What needs to improve1031w−57

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
12
Words of findings
3,224
about usual (typical 3071)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 44
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%What needs to improve 32%About the inspection 0%

Full report text

Yorkmead Junior and Infant School Inspection report

p.1

103284 Unique Reference Number Birmingham Local Authority 308274 Inspection number 17 °18 January 2008 Inspection dates Andrew McDowall Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary Type of school Community School category 3 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 470 School The governing body Appropriate authority Bob Harvey Chair Clive Garner Headteacher 23 June 2003 Date of previous school inspection York Road School address Birmingham B28 8BB 0121 4644215 Telephone number 0121 4646793 Fax number

p.1

3-11 Age group 17 °18 January 2008 Inspection dates 308274 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by three Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

This is a large primary school. It serves an area where levels of social and economic deprivation are above average. The percentage of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds is well above average, as is that of pupils who speak English as an additional language. The proportion of pupils who are eligible for free school meals is above average and the percentage of pupils with learning difficulties or disabilities is average. A breakfast club is provided for the pupils each day.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 11 Inspection Report: Yorkmead Junior and Infant School, 17 °18 January 2008

p.3

Grade: 4

In accordance with section 13 (3) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty's Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires special measures because it is failing to give its pupils an acceptable standard of education and the persons responsible for leading, managing or governing the school are not demonstrating the capacity to secure the necessary improvement. Although there are pockets of good practice in this school the overall quality of education it provides is inadequate. The headteacher is not giving the school the strategic leadership needed to bring about improvement. Consequently, there are serious weaknesses in provision that are failing to meet the needs of significant groups of pupils. Pupils' achievement is inadequate because it varies too much from class to class and significant groups of pupils underachieve. Children generally start school with skills and abilities that are below average and they make

p.4

Grade: 4

satisfactory gains in their learning in the Foundation Stage. However, achievement in Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2 is unsatisfactory because higher attaining pupils, those with learning difficulties or disabilities and those who speak English as an additional language make insufficient progress. Standards in both key stages are below average and are falling in Key Stage 1. The pupils' enjoyment of school is demonstrated by their good behaviour and positive attitudes. However, some say they find lessons boring and others complain that lessons are too slow. Pupils have a good understanding of what it means to live a healthy lifestyle. They are increasingly choosing healthy options at lunchtimes and enjoy the good opportunities they have to play and exercise. Pupils' understanding of their place in the community is developed well through such activities as fund raising for good causes and when older pupils act as reading

p.4

Grade: 4

partners for the younger pupils. They have a good appreciation of how to stay safe and have confidence in the staff to help them, should they feel threatened or unhappy. Pupils' potential economic well-being is adversely affected by their inadequate achievement. Teaching and learning are satisfactory in the Foundation Stage. However, this is too variable in Key Stages 1 and 2 and results in spasmodic and unsatisfactory pupil progress. Teachers generally explain tasks clearly and establish good relationships with the pupils. However, pupils' learning is often restricted by common weaknesses in teaching. The most capable pupils sometimes mark time because the work set for them is too easy. The pace of lessons is often pedestrian and teachers spend too long talking, leaving too little time for practical learning. Teachers' skills in assessing pupils' future learning are variable. Consequently, lesson planning

p.4

Grade: 4

takes too little account of the different capabilities of the pupils and tasks are not always well matched to their varying needs. The curriculum is satisfactory in the Foundation Stage, but is inadequate in Key Stages 1 and 2 because it is not adapted to meet the needs of all pupils. In particular, the needs of the most capable pupils and those with learning difficulties or disabilities and those who speak English as an additional language are not properly catered for. Across the school, provision for the pupils' personal development is good and helps the pupils to develop into caring and responsible individuals. The care, guidance and support provided by the school is inadequate despite the fact that aspects of the pupils' pastoral care are good. This is because there are significant weaknesses in the academic guidance that pupils receive. Very few pupils know their targets, and marking does not provide pupils with enough guidance on what they need to do to improve. The school

p.4

Grade: 4

4 of 11 Inspection Report: Yorkmead Junior and Infant School, 17 °18 January 2008 does not undertake any meaningful assessment of the needs of pupils who speak English as an additional language. Consequently, these pupils are not receiving the support and guidance they need to reach their potential. Safeguarding arrangements are in place and good support is provided for the most vulnerable pupils. The day-to-day management of the whole school is satisfactory; this helps pupils to feel safe and secure. However, the strategic leadership of the school is weak and fails to identify clear priorities for improvement. The school improvement plan lacks rigour and does not address known weaknesses in teaching, learning and achievement. The plan is unclear about what the school is trying to achieve or how it will measure its success. Expectations of staff are too low and little guidance is given to teachers regarding the way things should be done. As a result,

p.4

Grade: 4

provision varies greatly from class to class and is inadequate overall. Procedures for self-evaluation are unsatisfactory and fail to provide the leaders and managers with an accurate picture of the school's strengths and weaknesses. The governors are supportive of the school and have a general awareness of its performance, but their monitoring of the work of the school is inadequate.

p.5

Grade: 3

Children make satisfactory progress during their time in the Foundation Stage. The staff work well together and provision for the personal and social needs of the children is good. As a result, the children are happy, confident and make good progress in their personal development. The school has recognised that progress in early reading and writing has been slow. Action has been taken to give greater focus to language development and there are signs that standards in early reading and writing are beginning to improve. The curriculum is suitably broad and balanced and the teaching and learning are satisfactory. However, children are not always fully challenged by the work they are offered and are sometimes left for too long working in groups without adult intervention. Consequently, opportunities to address weaknesses in their speaking and listening skills are missed.

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

■ Raise standards in English and mathematics in Key Stages 1 and 2.

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

■ Improve the strategic leadership of the school and bring greater rigour to the way that leaders, managers and governors monitor and evaluate the work of the school and plan for improvement. ■ Improve the quality and consistency of the teaching by raising the expectations of staff, by planning work that meets the needs of all abilities and by increasing the pace of lessons. ■ Improve marking and assessment, so that all pupils receive clear guidance on what it is they need to do to improve and ensure that the needs of higher attaining pupils, those with learning difficulties or disabilities and those who speak English as an additional language are met.

p.5

Grade: 4

Standards in Key Stage 1 are well below average and achievement in Years 1 and 2 is inadequate because too few pupils are attaining the higher levels in reading and mathematics and the number reaching the expected levels in writing is very low. Standards in English and mathematics 5 of 11 Inspection Report: Yorkmead Junior and Infant School, 17 °18 January 2008 are below average in Key Stage 2 and although national data indicate broadly satisfactory achievement in Years 3 to 6 in 2007, this masks very uneven progress over the key stage. Standards in science are below average, but improved in 2007 because of good teaching in Year 6. In both key stages, many pupils with learning difficulties or disabilities make inadequate progress and the language acquisition of pupils who speak English as an additional language is inhibited by the lack of any meaningful assessment of their needs. The school sets appropriate

p.5

Grade: 4

targets for the pupils, but many pupils are not on track to reach them.

p.6

Grade: 2

The spiritual, social, moral and cultural development of the pupils is good. They behave well and have positive attitudes to learning. They demonstrate a good understanding of what is right and wrong. The child who said, 'If you are nice to a person they are nice back', shows their understanding of the need to respect others. Pupils have a good appreciation of the cultural diversity in the local community and everyone gets along well together. They say any incidents of bullying are rare and quickly dealt with by the staff. Attendance is satisfactory. The pupils' uneven progress in literacy and numeracy means that they not properly prepared for the next stage in their education and later life. However, they develop a good understanding of aspects of the world of work when they apply to take part in Year 6 work experience activities in the Foundation Stage. Annual visits to the Council House successfully foster an awareness

p.6

Grade: 4

The quality of teaching in the school is too variable to promote satisfactory achievement and is inadequate overall. Nonetheless, some classes benefit from good teaching. These teachers have high expectations for pupils' achievement and know just when to intervene with well-judged advice to help pupils improve. Elsewhere, pupils are often too passive and not actively engaged in their learning. At times there is an over reliance on mundane worksheets, resulting in all pupils doing the same work and making little progress. Day-to-day assessment of what pupils can do is too variable. Consequently, work is insufficiently well matched to the needs and abilities of different pupils within each group.

p.6

Grade: 4

The curriculum in Key Stages 1 and 2 has not been adapted to meet the needs of pupils of all abilities and backgrounds and this contributes to their under-achievement. Pupils have limited opportunities to practise their speaking and listening, problem-solving or decision-making skills. The school has recognised that the curriculum lacks creativity and has made a start at developing more stimulating learning opportunities for the pupils. The curriculum provides adequate opportunities for pupils to learn information and communication technology skills, but presents few opportunities for pupils to apply and consolidate these skills in other subjects. There is a satisfactory range of visitors and school clubs, which benefits pupils' learning and enriches the curriculum. The pupils particularly enjoy the regular educational visits that help to bring learning alive. 6 of 11 Inspection Report: Yorkmead Junior and Infant School, 17 °18 January 2008

p.6

Grade: 4

The good pastoral guidance pupils receive supports good progress in aspects of their personal and social development. Consequently, pupils feel safe and secure in school. However, pupils' academic guidance is inadequate because teachers provide pupils with insufficient direction on the next steps in their learning. Consequently, they are unclear about how they are progressing or what they need to do to improve. There is inadequate guidance and support for pupils who speak English as an additional language. Although the school generally addresses health and safety issues as they arise, action has yet to be taken to deal with the overcrowding issue raised in the report on the school written by one of Her Majesty's Inspectors in February 2007.

p.7

Grade: 4

The school does not have the capacity to improve because weaknesses in provision are not being addressed effectively. The headteacher is not providing the leadership and direction the school needs. The school has invested heavily in non-class-based senior staff, yet monitoring and evaluation in the school are weak. The senior staff are not effectively monitoring achievement or tackling the considerable variation in the quality of teaching and learning that is at the root of the underachievement in the school. There are systems to track the progress of individual pupils, but these are still being developed and are not used consistently to identify and tackle under-achievement. The most recent monitoring of pupils' work, undertaken by the deputy headteacher, is more rigorous, but it is too early to see any impact of this on achievement. Progress since the previous inspection and in addressing the issues raised by HMI on the visit

p.7

Grade: 4

in February 2007 is inadequate. 7 of 11 Inspection Report: Yorkmead Junior and Infant School, 17 °18 January 2008 .

p.7

Grade: 4

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 8 of 11 Inspection Report: Yorkmead Junior and Infant School, 17 °18 January 2008

p.8

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? No Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 3 The effectiveness of the Foundation Stage 4 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.9

Achievement and standards

4 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 4 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 How well learners enjoy their education 3 The attendance of learners 2 The behaviour of learners 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

and interests of learners?

4 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 9 of 11 Inspection Report: Yorkmead Junior and Infant School, 17 °18 January 2008

p.9

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 4 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 4 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? Yes Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 10 of 11 Inspection Report: Yorkmead Junior and Infant School, 17 °18 January 2008

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

19 January 2008 Dear Pupils Inspection of Yorkmead Junior and Infant School, Birmingham, B28 8BB I would like to say a big 'thank you' to you all for making us welcome when we visited your school recently. We enjoyed talking to you and finding out what you think about your school. We were pleased to see how well you behave in school and how you all get along so well together. You told us you like school and that you feel safe because the staff look after you and make sure nothing is worrying you. You told us you like the school clubs and particularly enjoy the school trips. At present, we think your school is not providing you all with a satisfactory education. We think you can all do better if your school improves. Therefore, we have asked the school to do the following things:

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ Help you all to get better in your literacy and numeracy.

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ Improve the way the senior staff and the governors check on the work of the school and to make sure they plan carefully so your school improves. ■ We have asked the teachers to make sure they set work that is just right for you and to make sure lessons move along quickly so you can learn more. ■ We have asked the teachers to improve the way they check on how your work is progressing. We have asked them to make sure your work is carefully marked and that they tell you what you need to do to improve and reach your targets. You can help your school by always trying your best and remembering your targets when you are doing your work. Your school will be having other inspectors visiting from time to time to see how things are improving. Yours sincerely Andy McDowall Lead inspector 11 of 11 Inspection Report: Yorkmead Junior and Infant School, 17 °18 January 2008

p.11

Annex B

Inspection of Yorkmead Junior and Infant School, Birmingham, B28 8BB

p.12

Annex B

I would like to say a big ‘thank you’ to you all for making us welcome when we visited your school recently. We enjoyed talking to you and finding out what you think about your school.

p.12

Annex B

We were pleased to see how well you behave in school and how you all get along so well together. You told us you like school and that you feel safe because the staff look after you and make sure nothing is worrying you. You told us you like the school clubs and particularly enjoy the school trips.

p.12

Annex B

At present, we think your school is not providing you all with a satisfactory education. We think you can all do better if your school improves. Therefore, we have asked the school to do the following things:

p.12

Annex B

• Help you all to get better in your literacy and numeracy. • Improve the way the senior staff and the governors check on the work of the school and to make sure they plan carefully so your school improves. • We have asked the teachers to make sure they set work that is just right for you and to make sure lessons move along quickly so you can learn more. • We have asked the teachers to improve the way they check on how your work is progressing. We have asked them to make sure your work is carefully marked and that they tell you what you need to do to improve and reach your targets.

p.12

Annex B

You can help your school by always trying your best and remembering your targets when you are doing your work. Your school will be having other inspectors visiting from time to time to see how things are improving.

p.12

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion