Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

St Thomas Centre Nursery School

Inspected 24 Jan 2008 · published 20 Feb 2008 · URN 103124

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Outstanding

Deana Holdaway

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    24 Jan 2008

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Deana Holdaway

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Outstanding

  • Postcode verified

    B15 2AF

  • Name on report verified

    St Thomas Centre Nursery

  • URN verified

    103124

Page 1 of 9
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallOutstanding

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+80Very positivemore positive than 4% of reports of this type graded Outstanding
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Outstanding.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexcellentoutstandingexceptionallyexemplaryeffectivelysuccessfullyconfidentlyeffective
Criticisminadequatenot robustbelownot sufficientlynot yetlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1794w+82
  • What needs to improve92w+11

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
1,859
shorter than usual (typical 2640)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
3
typical 8
Hedged sentences
1%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 89%What needs to improve 5%About the inspection 6%

Full report text

St Thomas Centre Nursery Inspection report

p.1

103124 Unique Reference Number Birmingham Local Authority 308226 Inspection number 24 January 2008 Inspection date Deana Holdaway HMI Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Nursery Type of school Community School category 3 °5 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 80 School The governing body Appropriate authority Jackie Edwards Chair Fran Munby Headteacher 1 January 0001 Date of previous school inspection Bell Barn Road School address Lee Bank Birmingham B15 2AF 01214 640003 Telephone number 01214 640002 Fax number

p.1

3-5 Age group 24 January 2008 Inspection date 308226 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by one of Her Majesty’s Inspectors. The inspection evaluated the overall effectiveness of the school, and investigated the following issues: • the progress children make during their time at the Nursery • the effectiveness of assessment and tracking • how well senior leaders evaluate and plan further improvements. Evidence was gathered from a range of sources, including observation of lessons, discussion with the children and staff, and analysis of school documents. The views of parents and the children themselves were taken into account. Other aspects of the school were not investigated in detail, but the inspection found no evidence to suggest that the school’s own judgements, as given in its self-evaluation, were not justified; these have been included, where appropriate, in this report.

p.3

Description of the school

St Thomas Centre Nursery is part of a Children's Centre providing care and education for children from birth to five years of age. It is situated in the city centre in an area undergoing major urban renewal and development. The proportion of pupils eligible for free school meals is higher than that found nationally and more children than average have learning difficulties and/or disabilities. A high proportion of children are from minority ethnic groups and a fifth of these children are learning English as an additional language.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 9 Inspection Report: St Thomas Centre Nursery, 24 January 2008

p.3

Grade: 1

St Thomas Centre Nursery is an outstanding school. Every child is valued and the school's depth of care extends beyond the children to their families. The children enter the nursery with standards below those expected for children of their age and leave well on their way to achieving the goals expected of them in all areas of learning. They make good progress because teachers and teaching assistants plan exciting experiences and activities for the children to explore, investigate and consider as they broaden their knowledge, develop their skills and deepen their understanding. All children succeed from their given starting points and there is no significant difference in the achievement of different groups. Teachers quickly identify children with learning difficulties and/or disabilities by careful observations in lessons and regular reviews of individual needs. Lesson plans integrate specific support, and the specialist knowledge of the staff ensures that all children continue to achieve.

p.4

Grade: 1

A small group of children is taught by a higher ratio of adults. This arrangement has helped children with significant difficulties to improve their concentration, social and communication skills. Personal development and well-being are excellent. From the very beginning, children are introduced to healthy behaviours and routines. Lessons extend outdoors each day and many visits are planned during the year which introduce the children to different environments and settings, including one week-long residential visit to a farm. The children's faiths and customs are represented well in events across the year. Musical instruments, art and textiles reflect a variety of cultures. Children are expected to behave well and they quickly learn how to share and work together in pairs and groups. Swimming lessons, some lunches and Friday activities include parents, who have welcomed learning alongside their children and expressed some

p.4

Grade: 1

surprise on witnessing them enthusiastically eating a range of fresh fruit and vegetables at lunchtime. Excellent links with health workers successfully extend the school's support to families. Parents overwhelmingly praise the school. One parent commented, 'It's excellent. I recommend the Nursery to everyone I meet!' Another described it accurately as 'a happy, fun-loving educating community'. The Nursery environment is one of care and security in which carefully planned experiences encourage children to develop their confidence and meet new challenges. As the children play, ride, climb and balance, they too consider their own safety and that of others. They are learning to share and take turns: adults deal swiftly with any upsets. Children enter the Nursery first thing in the morning and settle straight away into their routines. They leave their parents and carers confidently, take off their own coats and choose an activity. There is never a time when

p.4

Grade: 1

children have nothing to do and they approach each activity with enthusiasm and confidence. Teaching and learning are good overall, though teachers' classroom management, relationships with children and care for their well-being are outstanding. Activities are imaginative, varied and fun. Daily lesson plans respond directly to the previous day's observations, evaluations and conversations with parents. This cycle of assessment and planning ensures that the activities regularly respond to the children's needs, emerging interests or recent local events such as the pantomime, Peter Pan. One daily session is organised in groups according to ability and this arrangement ensures that teachers target their teaching to the children's specific levels of understanding. Whilst this level of assessment leads to imaginative and exciting learning experiences, it is not sufficiently robust to track each child's development and progress in detail

p.4

Grade: 1

4 of 9 Inspection Report: St Thomas Centre Nursery, 24 January 2008 and plan incremental steps of development. The school has also identified this as an area for improvement. The curriculum is exemplary. The staff plan collaboratively, successfully capture the children's imagination and purposefully engage them in learning. A recent curricular innovation, 'Popular Culture', further captured the children's interest with engaging stimuli. The excellent range of visits adds enrichment to the children's experience of life and learning. By visiting shops, clinics, libraries and building sites, they learn about different models of employment. The leaders and managers of this successful school are not complacent. Even where the school judges itself as outstanding, it has identified further improvement. The governors commented, 'There is a culture of always looking forward, never a sense of standing still, whether it's

p.4

Grade: 1

responding to children's needs or national initiatives. Change is seen as an opportunity.' The headteacher, in partnership with the deputy headteacher, has a very clear vision for the future. However, the school does not yet have sufficiently robust systems to record evaluations and commit to measurable outcomes when planning future improvements. The headteacher's ability to engage others, including governors, in contributing to decisions has created a united workforce with an excellent ability to achieve in the future.

p.5

Grade: 1

As the school only has children aged 3 to 5, there is no requirement to complete this section. The report covers, in full, the Foundation Stage.

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

■ Introduce robust assessment procedures which track individual children's progress so that steps in learning can be planned incrementally. ■ Ensure that evaluations are recorded accurately and that school improvement plans include measurable outcomes. 5 of 9 Inspection Report: St Thomas Centre Nursery, 24 January 2008 .

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 of 9 Inspection Report: St Thomas Centre Nursery, 24 January 2008

p.6

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.7

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 1 The effectiveness of the Foundation Stage 1 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.7

Achievement and standards

2 How well do learners achieve? 2 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.7

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 1 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 1 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 1 How well learners enjoy their education 3 The attendance of learners 2 The behaviour of learners 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.7

and interests of learners?

1 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.7

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 of 9 Inspection Report: St Thomas Centre Nursery, 24 January 2008

p.7

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 2 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 of 9 Inspection Report: St Thomas Centre Nursery, 24 January 2008

p.8

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

25 January 2008 Dear Children Inspection of St Thomas Centre Nursery, Birmingham B15 2AF I really enjoyed visiting your excellent school and thank you for showing me the many interesting things you do. I particularly enjoyed being invited to read to you or play along with you in your activities and wasn't that crocodile naughty chasing you around the pirate ship? Please say 'thank you' to your parents and carers for filling in the questionnaire because this helped me to know what they thought of your school. I was impressed to see how busy you are during the day. From the moment you enter to the moment you leave, you have many exciting things to do. Your toast smelled so inviting first thing in the morning and what wonderful lunches you have! You were eager to show me the books you have in your rooms and I was very pleased to see you knew how to handle books carefully, which way up to hold them and that the story was told in the print. You built some

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

fantastic structures with wood and you confidently used the computers and interactive whiteboard. I was glad to see that you behave well and help each other out. Always remember to be kind and caring, like the adults in your school. All the staff take care of you really well and want the best for you each of you. They have good plans to make the school even better and I suggested two things to help them with this. One is to write down what you can do so that teachers can see what you should learn next. The other thing is to plan ahead and say clearly how improvements will make things better for you. Good luck for the future, and remember always to try your best. Best wishes Deana Holdaway HMI 9 of 9 Inspection Report: St Thomas Centre Nursery, 24 January 2008

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion