Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Grafton Primary School

Inspected 9 May 2008 · published 5 Jun 2008 · URN 101206

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Satisfactory

Nigel Grimshaw

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    9 May 2008

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Nigel Grimshaw

  • Achievement verified

    Satisfactory

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Satisfactory

  • Personal development verified

    Satisfactory

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Satisfactory

  • Postcode verified

    RM8 3EX

  • Name on report verified

    Grafton Junior School

  • URN verified

    101206

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallSatisfactory
  • AchievementSatisfactory
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentSatisfactory
  • Teaching and learningSatisfactory

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+34Mostly positivemore positive than 14% of reports of this type graded Satisfactory
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

Reads more critically than most reports of this type graded Satisfactory.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseeffectiveexceptionallyenjoypositiveeffectivelypoliteconsistentlyhigh quality
Criticismnot alwaysbelownot consistentlytoo fewinadequatenot yetmissedlack

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1577w+41
  • What needs to improve1107w+22

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,660
about usual (typical 2839)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 59%What needs to improve 41%About the inspection 0%

Full report text

101206 Unique Reference Number Barking and Dagenham Local Authority 307612 Inspection number 8 °9 May 2008 Inspection dates Nigel Grimshaw Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Junior Type of school Community School category 7 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 432 School The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Ray Phillips Chair Mr John Hyde Headteacher 17 November 2003 Date of previous school inspection Grafton Road School address Dagenham RM8 3EX 020 8270 6445 Telephone number 020 8270 6451 Fax number

p.1

7-11 Age group 8 °9 May 2008 Inspection dates 307612 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by three Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

Grafton Junior School is larger than average. There are an above average number of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds and the number of pupils for whom English is not their first language has increased significantly. The percentage of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities is broadly in line with the national average. These pupils have a variety of difficulties but the majority have speech, language and communication difficulties. A breakfast service operates before school and there is a lottery funded Art Base for use by the school and the wider community. The school recently gained the Basic Skills Quality Mark Award.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 11 Inspection Report: Grafton Junior School, 8 °9 May 2008

p.3

Grade: 3

The school provides a satisfactory quality of education. Pupils say that they enjoy school. One child said, 'The school is very welcoming, there is no bullying and you learn a lot from the teachers'. Pupils are polite and helpful, and behaviour is good. Pupils are cared for well and their health and safety needs are fully met. Pupils' awareness of healthy lifestyles is good and reflected in the wide range of sporting activities undertaken at the school. The school has established good links with the secondary school physical education department to compensate for the lack of a playing field. Positions of responsibility are available to pupils through the monitor systems and the school council, and these have recently been broadened to include all year groups. The school has satisfactory links with the wider community and pupils have opportunities to raise funds for charitable causes. Social and moral development is good but

p.4

Grade: 3

there are insufficient cultural and spiritual experiences for the pupils. Attendance has recently improved as a result of actions taken by the school and it is actively seeking the support of parents in achieving further improvements. When pupils enter the school, they have skill levels below those expected for their age, especially in English. Pupils leave the school with standards broadly in line with, or just below, national averages. In 2007, standards in writing dipped considerably but the school has taken positive steps to provide better academic guidance through the use of improvement targets for pupils. There is clear evidence of improvement as a result, but standards in writing are still too low. Pupils make most progress when the teachers have high expectations, use assessment information to help match the work to individuals' needs and give them time to reflect on their learning. There are examples of good quality marking that give pupils clear guidance on how

p.4

Grade: 3

to improve their work, but this approach is not yet consistent across classes. In the best lessons, teachers take time to talk to pupils about their progress and discuss their next steps for improving their work. The significant majority of parents are appreciative of the school and the quality of education provided. However, the school does not always provide sufficient opportunities to involve them in supporting the learning of their children. For example, pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities have education plans that are not always shared with their parents. The curriculum is satisfactory, but links between subjects are still developing. For instance, opportunities for pupils to apply and reinforce their newly learnt writing skills in history and geography are sometimes limited. Similarly, the opportunity was missed to follow up an information technology lesson on data handling by giving pupils a chance to apply the skills

p.4

Grade: 3

they had learnt in the next mathematics lesson. The effectiveness of the leadership and management of the school is satisfactory. Monitoring and evaluation of the school's work has developed very well over the last year but is not yet rigorous enough to ensure a consistently high quality of teaching and learning. In monitoring the school's work, leaders and governors do not always give clear points for development, nor follow these up promptly to ensure action has been taken to tackle them. There are examples of good practice in classroom teaching that are not currently shared sufficiently through modelling of lessons and working alongside colleagues. Governors are very supportive. The school has made sound progress since its last inspection and has a satisfactory capacity to improve further. 4 of 11 Inspection Report: Grafton Junior School, 8 °9 May 2008

p.4

What the school should do to improve further

■ Improve the teaching of writing by giving pupils increased opportunities to write in more subject areas and providing better guidance for pupils in marking. ■ Make teaching more consistent by matching work more precisely to pupils' abilities and involving them more in the assessment of their own achievement. ■ Sustain improvements to standards by sharpening the monitoring and evaluation of the school's performance. ■ Seek further ways of actively involving parents in their children's learning at school and at home. A small proportion of the schools whose overall effectiveness is judged satisfactory but which have areas of underperformance will receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next section 5 inspection.

p.5

Grade: 3

Pupils enter the school with standards consistently below average. They make satisfactory progress in mathematics, science and ICT and good progress in their personal development. Standards are broadly in line by the end of Year 6. In 2007, standards in writing were much lower than in previous years but the school is addressing this issue. Consequently, the current group of pupils are on track to do better. However, standards remain below expectations. In the past, pupils with learning difficulties have made inconsistent, though satisfactory, rates of progress as a result of variations in the quality of teaching and support provided for them across the school. The school's recent involvement in the Intensifying Support Programme has ensured that pupils are now receiving help that is targeted more accurately at their learning needs.

p.5

Grade: 3

Pupils' personal development is satisfactory. Pupils say they feel safe at school and they know which adults to approach if they have problems. Pupils have a good knowledge of how to keep healthy and stay safe. They say that their teachers listen to them and are very understanding. However, there are missed opportunities for pupils to express their thinking and ideas through discussions in lessons. Pupils' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development is satisfactory. Relationships amongst pupils in the school and between pupils and their teachers are good. Pupils in Year 6 have a range of responsibilities and those who manage the Tuck Shop are particularly effective. The suppliers wrote to the school saying how very impressed they had been with the polite, confident and precise way that the pupils had placed their orders. Pupils in other year groups have fewer opportunities to demonstrate personal responsibility, although

p.5

Grade: 3

the School Council has recently been reconstituted to include pupils from Years 3 to 5.

p.5

Grade: 3

Teaching and learning are satisfactory. There is a positive learning environment in lessons and pupils are well behaved and attentive. Teachers explain the objectives of each lesson but do not give sufficient opportunities for pupils to share ideas with others or to evaluate their own 5 of 11 Inspection Report: Grafton Junior School, 8 °9 May 2008 learning. The most effective lessons include good, challenging class discussions with time for pupils to reflect on their learning and to assess how well they are doing. This was seen to very good effect in a Year 3 mathematics lesson, when pupils thoroughly explored different methods of calculation and shared these with their classmates. Specialist assistants provide effective support to pupils who need additional help, including those whose first language is not English. However, in some lessons, they could use their time more effectively by being involved in

p.5

Grade: 3

assessing pupils' progress. Teachers mark pupils' work diligently and have recently introduced learning targets for pupils to aim towards. However, teachers do not consistently use assessments of pupils' performance to tailor work to meet individuals' specific learning needs and abilities.

p.6

Grade: 3

The school provides a satisfactory programme of personal, social and health education. This is having a positive effect on pupils' attitudes and behaviour, which is helping them to grow and learn in a harmonious community. There are good opportunities for pupils to participate in sport and the creative arts, including music. Most of the curriculum is taught in discrete subjects but there are too few opportunities for pupils to apply their reading, writing, mathematics and ICT skills in other subjects. In particular, pupils have too few opportunities to develop their skills through writing at length in different subjects. A satisfactory range of extra activities such as day visits and visitors, as well as specially themed weeks, such as arts or book week, helps to enrich the work pupils undertake in lessons.

p.6

Grade: 3

The school provides satisfactory care, guidance and support for pupils. Pupils receive good pastoral care. The arrangements for safeguarding pupils are secure and records are properly maintained. Assessment procedures, including teachers' marking, are satisfactory. There are some inconsistencies in the quality of assessment practice in the school; with some good practice being seen, for example, when pupils are given opportunities to evaluate their learning, and explain their thinking. Some pupils, but not all, receive valuable feedback on how well they are doing and are given advice on what they need to do to improve. However, effective assessment procedures are not consistently embedded in the school to ensure that all pupils receive good academic guidance. Arrangements for the support for pupils with learning difficulties are satisfactory, and there are well established links with external agencies. The school is in the

p.6

Grade: 3

process of reviewing the quality of its communications with parents, particularly of those with pupils with learning difficulties.

p.6

Grade: 3

The leadership and management of the school are satisfactory. The headteacher receives good support from the deputy headteachers and the core subject leaders but the balance of wider responsibilities is uneven. Better processes for planning, monitoring and evaluating the school's work have been introduced this year and these are beginning to raise standards. The school has better information on pupils' progress that it is increasingly using to identify and tackle 6 of 11 Inspection Report: Grafton Junior School, 8 °9 May 2008 underachievement. Most parents are very appreciative of the standard of education provided by the school. However, the school could provide more opportunities to involve parents in supporting their children's learning and this was reflected in a number of the questionnaires returned. Self-evaluation is satisfactory and the school development plan focuses on the most important priorities. For example, the school has an action plan to raise standards in writing.

p.6

Grade: 3

Governors show strong commitment and support but need to be more rigorous in monitoring the work of the school. 7 of 11 Inspection Report: Grafton Junior School, 8 °9 May 2008 .

p.7

Grade: 3

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 8 of 11 Inspection Report: Grafton Junior School, 8 °9 May 2008

p.8

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 3 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.9

Achievement and standards

3 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

3 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 How well learners enjoy their education 3 The attendance of learners 2 The behaviour of learners 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

and interests of learners?

3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 9 of 11 Inspection Report: Grafton Junior School, 8 °9 May 2008

p.9

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 3 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 10 of 11 Inspection Report: Grafton Junior School, 8 °9 May 2008

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

22 May 2008 Dear Pupils Inspection of Grafton Junior School,Dagenham,RM8 3EX Thank you for being so friendly and welcoming when we visited your school. We really enjoyed talking to you and visiting your lessons. We found all of you to be polite and helpful, especially if we looked lost! We were glad to hear that you enjoy school. Your teachers and other staff care about you and work very hard to help you to be successful. You told us that you feel safe and secure at school, knowing that an adult will always be there to help you if you need it. Your behaviour is good both in the classrooms and outside. The quality of your writing has improved this year but it could be better still. To make things even better, this is what we have asked the school to do.

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ Help you reach higher standards in writing by giving you more opportunities to write in all subjects and also to give you more help when your work is marked. ■ Plan more lessons that have work that provides the right level of challenge for all of you.

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ Involve you even more in evaluating your own work, and giving you a clear idea of how well you are doing and what you need to do next to improve. ■ Check more thoroughly that all lessons are good and that you are making the best possible progress. ■ Work more closely with your parents so that they can give you even more help at home and in school. You can all help by continuing to work hard and trying to do that little bit extra, especially in your writing. We hope that you continue to enjoy your learning and we wish you and the school well in the future. Yours sincerely Nigel Grimshaw Lead Inspector 11 of 11 Inspection Report: Grafton Junior School, 8 °9 May 2008

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion