Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

St Luke's CofE Primary School

Inspected 17 Oct 2007 · published 19 Nov 2007 · URN 101134

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    17 Oct 2007

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paula Protherough

  • Achievement verified

    Inadequate

  • Care guidance support verified

    Inadequate

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Inadequate

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    W9 3EJ

  • Name on report verified

    St Luke's CofE Primary School

  • URN verified

    101134

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • AchievementInadequate
  • Care guidance supportInadequate
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentInadequate
  • Teaching and learningInadequate

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+6Mostly positivemore positive than 54% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexceptionallyimprovedenjoyexcellentsuccessfullypositiveeffectivelypolite
Criticisminadequatenot alwaysat risktoo lowlackinsufficienttoo oftenlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1662w+28
  • What needs to improve1226w−21

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,852
about usual (typical 3071)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 44, typical 44
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
14%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 57%What needs to improve 42%About the inspection 0%

Full report text

St Luke's CofE Primary School Inspection report

p.1

101134 Unique Reference Number Westminster Local Authority 307597 Inspection number 16 °17 October 2007 Inspection dates Paula Protherough Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary Type of school Voluntary aided School category 5 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 164 School The governing body Appropriate authority Mrs Abby Howe Chair Mrs Barbara Dunn Headteacher 22 April 2002 Date of previous school inspection Fernhead Road School address London W9 3EJ 020 7641 5855 Telephone number 020 7641 5827 Fax number

p.1

5-11 Age group 16 °17 October 2007 Inspection dates 307597 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by two Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

St Luke's is a smaller than average primary school. It serves an area of considerable social and economic disadvantage with over half of the pupils entitled to free school meals. There is a rich ethnic mix with over 90% of pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds. The largest groups are Black Caribbean and Black Other. Over half of the pupils speak English as an additional language. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities and statements of special educational needs are similar to national figures. The school has been through a turbulent period in recent years particularly in relation to staffing.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 11 Inspection Report: St Luke's CofE Primary School, 16 °17 October 2007

p.3

Grade: 4

In accordance with section 13(3) of the education act 2005 HMCI is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement because it is performing significantly less well than in all the circumstances it could reasonably be expected to perform. The school is therefore given a notice to improve. Significant improvement is required in relation to standards and achievement, the quality of teaching and the behaviour and attitudes of pupils. The school's performance has declined since the previous inspection. Standards at the ages of seven and eleven are too low and have been for some time. Excellent teaching in the Year 6 class helps the pupils make up some lost ground in English, but results in mathematics and science remain too low. Overall, teaching is inadequate. The frequent changes of staff in recent years have made it difficult to establish consistent approaches to teaching and learning. As a

p.4

Grade: 4

result, pupils have not made the progress of which they are capable. Although the leadership team tracks pupils thoroughly to identify those at risk of underachieving and sets suitably challenging targets, the teachers do not always put this information to good use. Consequently, work is not always well matched to the individual needs of the pupils. Teachers' day-to-day assessment and marking are inadequate in many classes and do not tell pupils how to improve their work. Inconsistency of adults' expectation has also had a significant impact upon the pupils' all round development. Although many pupils are polite, friendly and behave well, a significant minority demonstrate less positive attitudes. Some of these show little respect for adults and others misbehave in lessons and disturb the learning of their classmates. A new behaviour policy is a step in the right direction. There has been a reduction in the number of recorded incidents of

p.4

Grade: 4

bad behaviour. However, all staff do not yet consistently enforce the policy. There are clear signs of recovery. The headteacher and her acting deputy have a secure grasp of what to do next. They have made rigorous, honest evaluations of the school's past and present performance and devised an appropriate plan for improvement. Several initiatives are already bearing fruit in key areas such as attendance and the rising standards in literacy at the end of Key Stage 2. Similarly, new appointments have improved provision in the Foundation Stage, which is now providing children with a good start to their education. The school is working successfully to build its relationship with parents and carers and has quadrupled the numbers that now attend parent-teacher consultations, albeit from a very low base. There are improving links with the community and good use is made of specialist advice from other agencies such as the LA. The significant improvements made recently show that the school has

p.4

Grade: 4

satisfactory capacity to improve further.

p.4

Grade: 2

The children in the Reception class have a positive start to school life in a stimulating, well-ordered environment. Enthusiastic, committed adults provide an exciting, creative and well-planned curriculum that successfully covers all six areas of learning. Children feel safe and well cared for because they are well looked after. There is a good balance of both indoor and outdoor play to support their learning. These activities promote the love of learning and children respond with great enjoyment because teaching matches their needs. Most children join the school with standards that are well below those expected for their age, particularly in relation 4 of 11 Inspection Report: St Luke's CofE Primary School, 16 °17 October 2007 to early language and communication and early literacy and mathematical skills. Although they make good progress during the Reception year, their attainment is still below the levels expected

p.4

Grade: 2

in mathematics and early writing skills when they enter Year 1. Detailed, meticulous observations of the children's progress help staff plan the next steps in their development. Parents are involved with their children's education and are very happy with their progress.

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

■ Raise standards and improve progress for all pupils in English, mathematics and science.

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

■ Improve the quality of teaching so that it meets the needs of the pupils and promotes enjoyment of learning. ■ Improve the behaviour of pupils in lessons and around the school through consistent application of the agreed behaviour policy.

p.5

Grade: 4

Recent improvements to Foundation Stage provision are accelerating children's progress, especially in relation to their social and communication skills. However, few are currently on course to meet the goals expected of five-year-olds because they are starting from levels that are much lower than are usually found. Throughout the school, pupils' progress is erratic and they have not achieved well enough in recent years. This is reflected in low standards at Years 2 and 6 in English, mathematics and science. There are some signs of improvement. For instance, effective tracking of progress and more rigorous target setting is now helping the school to identify all pupils who are at risk of underachieving. Thus, in 2007, booster support for the more able helped to raise the number of pupils achieving higher levels in English, mathematics and science. This year, 'catch up' programmes have been identified for other groups of pupils. For instance, the new special

p.5

Grade: 4

needs co-ordinator has devised appropriate support programmes for pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities. There are similar plans to raise the performance of pupils who speak English as an additional language. Although these initiatives are at an early stage of development, they are positive indicators of a new and systematic approach to improve the achievements of all groups of pupils.

p.5

Grade: 4

Pupils say that they enjoy school and, when talking in small groups and individually, many are polite, and courteous. However, the behaviour of a significant minority of pupils shows lack of respect or consideration for others. This occasionally disrupts learning or leads to tensions when pupils are at play. The school council enthusiastically contributes ideas for improving the school and last year acquired new games equipment in the playground. However, overall, pupils have insufficient opportunities to take responsibility in lessons and around the school. Pupils have a basic knowledge of how to keep healthy with good involvement in a wide range of sporting activities provided by the school and the local community. Recent actions to improve attendance have been successful and figures are now close to the national average. Many pupils make contributions to the community through fund raising activities and have a sound awareness

p.5

Grade: 4

of the diversity of cultures that surrounds them. However, the low level of pupils' basic skills means that few are adequately prepared for the challenge of secondary education. 5 of 11 Inspection Report: St Luke's CofE Primary School, 16 °17 October 2007

p.5

Grade: 4

Teaching is inadequate because of inconsistent approaches to promoting learning and the management of behaviour. Too often, work does not match the learning styles of the pupils because teachers talk too much and expect pupils to listen passively rather than engage in interesting activities. There are insufficient opportunities for pupils to show what they know because they have to put their hands up rather than discuss their answers with other pupils or give a group response. As a result, pupils become frustrated and distracted, and behaviour deteriorates. Some lessons are slow because inattention, low-level disruption and disrespect for adults are not dealt with swiftly, or firmly. Inspectors' analysis of pupils' books and folders also revealed that in some classes, where work is unmarked, pupils lose interest and cease taking pride in the content and presentation of their work. There are pockets of better practice such as in Foundation Stage and Year 6. Here and in better

p.6

Grade: 4

lessons elsewhere, pupils show that when they have a sense of purpose and are actively engaged in their learning they can concentrate, work collaboratively and behave well.

p.6

Grade: 3

The curriculum provides a reasonable range of learning opportunities to meet the needs and interests of pupils. The new information and communication technology (ICT) suite and interactive whiteboards in classes have improved opportunities for pupils to develop their skills in the use of new technology. The strengths of the curriculum lie in the educational visits within the local area and residential visits to provide first-hand learning experiences. Curriculum enrichment through specialist visitors and after-school activities are received with great enthusiasm. Pupils behave better in these more flexible and creative sessions and they enjoy music and sport. Involvement with the community supports the curriculum with projects that include the Paddington Arts Centre, Notting Hill Carnival and a Business Enterprise Day. The taught curriculum has a suitable emphasis on the development of the core skills of literacy

p.6

Grade: 3

and numeracy. Plans to enable pupils to practise and apply these skills in other subjects remain at an early stage of development.

p.6

Grade: 4

Pupils are safe and secure during their time at school. Those who spoke with the inspectors said they feel safe and that adults listen to their views and take care of them. They also said that there can be occasional bullying, but that this is dealt with swiftly by senior staff. However, the overall quality of social and academic guidance provided for pupils is inadequate. The school's behaviour policy is not applied consistently so pupils are not always clear what is expected of them. Bad behaviour sometimes goes unchecked, whilst approaches to rewarding good behaviour lack consistency. Although the leadership team tracks in detail the academic progress made by individual pupils and each year group, the use made by teachers of this information varies widely. Too often, pupils are unclear about what they have achieved, what they need to be learning next and how they will know when they have succeeded.

p.6

Grade: 4

6 of 11 Inspection Report: St Luke's CofE Primary School, 16 °17 October 2007

p.6

Grade: 3

The school's effectiveness had deteriorated after the last inspection, but it is now improving. The leadership team of headteacher and acting deputy headteacher have made an accurate diagnosis of the school's performance, and have successfully taken the first steps towards improvement. Until very recently, they have shouldered too much of the work because there have not been the permanent staff necessary to develop middle management and support curriculum development. Recent appointments to support the Foundation Stage and the provision for pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities have improved the situation, but the school still lacks a co-ordinator for mathematics. The leadership team has a clear vision and plan for the future. Its evaluation of standards and the quality of teaching across the school is accurate and the actions taken have improved provision in some classes, but not all. The governing body works closely with the leadership

p.7

Grade: 3

team and understands those areas where it can help move the school forward, for instance, in supporting community links and challenging the level of pupils' achievements. The school is making good use of the extensive support provided on many fronts from the LA and also the support from the London Diocesan Board for Schools, especially in relation to staffing. 7 of 11 Inspection Report: St Luke's CofE Primary School, 16 °17 October 2007 .

p.7

Grade: 3

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 8 of 11 Inspection Report: St Luke's CofE Primary School, 16 °17 October 2007

p.8

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? No Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The effectiveness of the Foundation Stage 3 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.9

Achievement and standards

4 How well do learners achieve? 4 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 4 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

4 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 3 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 3 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 3 How well learners enjoy their education 3 The attendance of learners 4 The behaviour of learners 3 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

and interests of learners?

4 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 9 of 11 Inspection Report: St Luke's CofE Primary School, 16 °17 October 2007

p.9

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 3 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? Yes Does this school require a notice to improve? 10 of 11 Inspection Report: St Luke's CofE Primary School, 16 °17 October 2007

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

12 November 2007 Dear Pupils Inspection of St Luke's CofE Primary School,London,W9 3EJ Thank you for welcoming us when we came to inspect your school. Many of you said that you like school and this was clear when we spoke with your very keen school council. We could see that there have been some good changes recently such as new playground equipment and better English lessons. The adults in your school keep you safe and you told us all about how to lead healthy lives and your healthy school meals. Your attendance is getting better and many of you seem to enjoy the chance to take part in sporting and musical activities. However, we think that there are some important improvements that need to be made and we have given your school a 'Notice to Improve'. 1. Too many of you are not making enough progress during your time at school and need to do better, especially in your writing, mathematics and science, otherwise you are going to find

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

it difficult when you transfer to secondary school. 2. Some lessons at your school are exciting and well organised. The teachers get you interested and tell you how to improve your work. We want all lessons to be this good. 3. A few of you are not as polite, kind and considerate as you should be. Sometimes you talk too much in lessons and disturb other people so that they can't work. Occasionally you are rude to other people, even adults. You all need to treat each other with respect and follow the sensible rules on your playground wall. We think that the people who lead your school know what they need to do to make these things happen, but they need your help. We are sure that you and your teachers can work together to improve your school. Best wishes Paula Protherough Lead Inspector 11 of 11 Inspection Report: St Luke's CofE Primary School, 16 °17 October 2007

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion