Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Horniman Primary School

Inspected 22 Nov 2007 · published 7 Dec 2007 · URN 100714

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    22 Nov 2007

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Margaret Coussins

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Good

  • Postcode verified

    SE23 3BP

  • Name on report verified

    Horniman Primary School

  • URN verified

    100714

Page 8 of 9
Page 8 of the report with the evidence highlighted

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallGood

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+84Very positivemore positive than 67% of reports of this type graded Good
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Good.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseoutstandingexcellentexceptionallystrongmake good progressgood progressenjoypositive
Criticisminadequateat risknot alwaysbelowweakerlowerlow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1981w+86
  • What needs to improve69w−33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
9
Words of findings
2,022
shorter than usual (typical 2775)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 47
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
3
typical 8
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 96%What needs to improve 3%About the inspection 1%

Full report text

Horniman Primary School Inspection report

p.1

100714 Unique Reference Number Lewisham Local Authority 307453 Inspection number 22 November 2007 Inspection date Margaret Coussins Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary Type of school Community School category 4 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 187 School The governing body Appropriate authority Ms Rosemary Magrath Chair Ms Julia Clark Headteacher 20 May 2002 Date of previous school inspection Horniman Drive School address Forest Hill London SE23 3BP 020 8699 3190 Telephone number 020 8699 9911 Fax number

p.1

4-11 Age group 22 November 2007 Inspection date 307453 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

This inspection was carried out by an Additional Inspector. The inspector evaluated the overall effectiveness of the school and investigated the following issues:

p.3

Introduction

Evidence was gathered from performance data, observation of teaching and learning, school information and records and pupils' work. Parents' questionnaires and discussions with children and staff also contributed to the judgements. Other aspects of the school's work were not investigated in detail, but the inspector found no evidence to suggest that the school's own assessments, as given in its self-evaluation, were not justified and these have been included, where appropriate, in this report.

p.3

Description of the school

Horniman is a smaller than average primary school. Its pupils come from backgrounds which are socially, economically and culturally diverse. The proportion of pupils with learning difficulties or disabilities is higher than average. The proportion with English as an additional language is lower than average. The school has an Artsmark Silver award and a Healthy School award.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 9 Inspection Report: Horniman Primary School, 22 November 2007

p.3

Grade: 2

This is a good school with some outstanding features. The overriding impression is that of a friendly, purposeful environment in which meeting the needs of all pupils and helping them to do their best are of the utmost importance. There is a strong work ethic and caring ethos. Pupils really enjoy their time in school, a place where they feel safe, secure and happy to play their part in the school community. Parents are very pleased with what the school offers. As one wrote, 'The school has a happy and welcoming atmosphere and each child is encouraged to reach their potential.' Excellent relationships permeate the school. As a result of this and the outstanding care, guidance and support, pupils' personal skills are excellent. Although the inspector did not inspect personal development and well-being, it is clear that pupils are confident, lively, thoughtful and generally well behaved and who, by Year 6 are well prepared for secondary

p.4

Grade: 2

school and their future lives. Some pupils who find it difficult to moderate their own behaviour are managed well by teachers in lessons so that any inappropriate behaviour does not disrupt the learning of others. Pupils make good progress irrespective of their gender, ethnicity or ability. By the end of Year 2, standards are above average. Many pupils start at the school in Years 3 to 6, generally adding to the high number of pupils with learning difficulties. This means that the average standards shown in the test results at the end of Year 6 are not always indicative of the good progress pupils make, particularly in English. However, standards should be higher and senior leaders are aware that more needs to be done to raise them further, mainly by increasing the proportion of teaching which is good and outstanding. The school has worked hard to improve standards in mathematics, which was an issue for improvement at the last inspection. Inspection evidence

p.4

Grade: 2

and the school's own data indicate that its actions are showing positive results and standards in mathematics have risen. This is in part due to the effective use of information and communication technology. The inspector agrees with pupils who said that the use of interactive whiteboards 'makes learning fun and more interesting.' The emphasis on educating the whole child adds breadth to pupils' achievements and increases their enjoyment of school. One parent wrote, 'My daughter absolutely loves school and never wants to be late because she might miss all the fun.' The school is rightly proud of its strong musical provision and the benefits to the pupils from the expertise of a music specialist. Artwork around the school is impressive. Pupils appreciate the wide range of clubs available after school. One pupil said, 'There are loads of them and we really enjoy them'. The headteacher is committed to ensuring that pupils are offered a creative, enriched curriculum and a broad range of

p.4

Grade: 2

experiences. Extended provision before and after school has a very positive impact on pupils' progress. One child said of the Breakfast Club, 'It's great and sets you up for learning in the day.' Pupils have an excellent awareness of the need to eat a balanced diet and take regular exercise in order to stay healthy, and older pupils take advantage of the fruit tuck shop organised by Year 6. Throughout the school, good systems identify and support pupils who are at risk of underachieving, those with learning difficulties or disabilities and those who are more able. Careful and innovative management of additional support for pupils as well as the enhanced skills of teaching assistants enables these pupils to make good progress. Good teaching, an interesting curriculum and the school's tracking systems, which keep detailed information on 4 of 9 Inspection Report: Horniman Primary School, 22 November 2007

p.4

Grade: 2

all individuals, contribute to pupils' good progress and their well-being. Academic guidance is very good. The assessment of pupils' progress enables teachers to give good, clear guidance to pupils about what they need to do to improve. Pupils are taught to evaluate their own learning needs and by Year 6 they are confident and competent in this skill. The driving force behind the school's success is the good leadership provided. The headteacher, senior leaders and governors are fully involved in accurately evaluating and improving the school's work. There is very clear strategic direction for the school, which is constantly striving to enhance the education it offers its pupils. The headteacher has a clear view of the school's strengths and what it needs to do to improve further because of good systems for checking how well it is doing. Teamwork is strong and staff are motivated to succeed. Recently appointed

p.5

Grade: 2

leaders are supported well and given clear direction and guidance from senior leaders. However they have not been in post long enough for their work to make an impact on standards. Issues from the previous inspection have been dealt with effectively. This is shown, for example, by the improvements in the quality of teaching and improved attendance, which is now above the national average. These successes demonstrate that the capacity to improve further is good. Positive relationships with parents and the good levels of support from outside agencies contribute significantly to pupils' good progress. The 'Star Cards' are a good example of everyone working together in a school where everyone feels valued. As one parent said, 'At Horniman, we feel like part of a family.'

p.5

Grade: 2

Evidence provided by the school indicates that children get off to a good start in the Reception class because of good teaching and a curriculum which provides a good balance of activities directed by teachers and those where children make their own choices. When children start at school, their attainment is slightly below the expectations for their age. They settle well and make good progress. Most achieve the expected goals for learning by the end of the Foundation Stage. Reading and writing have been weaker but the increased focus on teaching children to link sounds and letters is improving the pace of progress in these areas. The Foundation Stage staff provide children with interesting and exciting things to do, both indoors and outdoors.

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

■ Raise standards in English, mathematics and science in Years 3 to 6. 5 of 9 Inspection Report: Horniman Primary School, 22 November 2007 .

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 6 of 9 Inspection Report: Horniman Primary School, 22 November 2007

p.6

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.7

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The effectiveness of the Foundation Stage 2 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.7

Achievement and standards

2 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.7

learners?

1 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 1 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 1 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 1 How well learners enjoy their education 2 The attendance of learners 2 The behaviour of learners 1 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.7

and interests of learners?

1 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.7

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 7 of 9 Inspection Report: Horniman Primary School, 22 November 2007

p.7

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 2 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 2 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 8 of 9 Inspection Report: Horniman Primary School, 22 November 2007

p.8

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

30 November 2007 Dear Pupils Inspection of Horniman Primary School,London,SE23 3BP I am writing to let you know how much I enjoyed my visit to your school and what I found out. Thank you for making me so welcome, for talking to me about your work and telling me what you think about your school. I agree with you and your parents that yours is a good school and here are some of the reasons why.

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ You really enjoy being at the school and get on really well with each other.

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ You learn well because your teachers give you plenty of interesting things to do in lessons.

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ There are many interesting things for you to do outside of lessons. I know that you really appreciate these. ■ The adults in your school look after you really well.

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

■ Your headteacher and the senior leaders do a good job.

p.9

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

Everyone wants your school to be even better and you can help by always working as hard as you can in your mathematics, English and science lessons particularly those of you in Years 3 to 6. I was very impressed with some of the artwork on display around the school and I was lucky enough to hear you playing in a music lesson, which was great. Thank you again for all your help and for being so friendly, polite and interesting to talk to. With best wishes Yours sincerely Margaret Coussins Lead Inspector 9 of 9 Inspection Report: Horniman Primary School, 22 November 2007

p.9

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion