Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 4 Jul 2001

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

    Page 1 of 15
    Page 1 of the report

    Deep dive

    What this report says

    In plain English

    Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

    Tone of the report

    How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

    −49Criticalmore positive than 7% of reports of this type

    Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

    Praisestrengthsoutstandingeffectiveexcellenteffectivelyenthusiasticconfidentstrength
    Criticismweaknesseslimitedinsufficientpoorweaknessslowfailureinadequate

    How the report reads, start to finish

    Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

    FindingsLeadership positive critical
    • Findings5755w−48
    • Leadership946w−50

    Strengths

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    Concerns

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    Next steps

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    What the report dwells on

    Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

    Anatomy of the report

    How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

    Pages
    15
    Words of findings
    6,670
    longer than usual (typical 1049)
    Reading level
    Fairly hard
    Flesch 52, typical 45
    Average sentence
    21 words
    Next steps
    2
    typical 5
    Hedged sentences
    8%
    “some”, “not always”, “most”…

    Where the words go

    Findings 86%Leadership 14%

    Full report text

    T R A I N I N G S T A N D A R D S C O U N C I L I N S P E C T I O N R E P O R T J A N U A R Y 2 0 0 0

    p.1

    A D U L T L E A R N I N G I N S P E C T O R A T E R E I N S P E C T I O N A P R I L 2 0 0 1

    p.1

    Didac Limited T R A I N I N G S T A N D A R D S C O U N C I L I N S P E C T I O N R E P O R T : D I D A C L I M I T E D J A N U A R Y 2 0 0 0 A D U L T L E A R N I N G I N S P E C T O R A T E R E I N S P E C T I O N A P R I L 2 0 0 1

    p.1

     Adult Learning Inspectorate Adult Learning Inspectorate

    p.2

    The Adult Learning Inspectorate (ALI) was established under the provisions of the Learning and Skills Act 2000 to bring the inspection of all aspects of adult learning and work-based training within the remit of a single inspectorate. The ALI is responsible for inspecting a wide range of government-funded learning, including:

    p.2

    ♦ work-based training for all people over 16 ♦ provision in further education colleges for people aged 19 and over ♦ the University for Industry’s learndirect provision ♦ adult and community learning ♦ training given by the Employment Service under the New Deals.

    p.2

    Inspections are carried out in accordance with the Common Inspection Framework by teams of full-time inspectors and part-time associate inspectors who have knowledge of, and experience in, the work which they inspect. All providers are invited to nominate a senior member of their staff to participate in the inspection as a team member.

    p.2

    In summarising their judgements about the quality of provision in curriculum or occupational areas and about the quality of leadership and management, including quality assurance and equality of opportunity, inspectors use a five-point scale. The descriptors for the five grades are:

    p.2

    ♦ grade 1 – outstanding ♦ grade 2 – good ♦ grade 3 – satisfactory ♦ grade 4 – unsatisfactory ♦ grade 5 – very weak. T R A I N I N G S T A N D A R D S C O U N C I L I N S P E C T I O N R E P O R T : D I D A C L I M I T E D J A N U A R Y 2 0 0 0 A D U L T L E A R N I N G I N S P E C T O R A T E R E I N S P E C T I O N A P R I L 2 0 0 1

    p.2

    The original inspection of Didac Limited was carried out by the Training Standards Council’s inspectors. The inspection resulted in less than satisfactory grades being awarded for equal opportunities. This area has been reinspected against the requirements of the Common Inspection Framework by the Adult Learning Inspectorate, which replaced the Training Standards Council on 1 April 2001. The section of the original report dealing with equal opportunities has been replaced with the findings of the reinspection. Also, the report summary, report introduction and introduction to the inspection findings have been updated and reflect the findings of the reinspection. Sections of the report, dealing with areas which have not been reinspected, have been left in their original form. The amended inspection report is published on the Adult Learning Inspectorate’s website ( www.ali.gov.uk ).

    p.3

    Didac Limited provides good training in wood machining, furniture production and hand-crafted furniture. All training is carried out in the workplace. Training materials are good. Trainees are employed in companies throughout the Southwest. At the time of the original inspection there were no routine procedures for ensuring equality of opportunity for trainees. The monitoring systems are now effective and equal opportunities is actively promoted, although there are no trainees from under-represented groups. Trainees are given a comprehensive induction and emphasis is placed on the importance of health and safety. There is insufficient support for trainees with additional needs. All trainers are specialists within their specific areas and training is effectively co-ordinated and well managed. Some trainees make slow progress towards achieving an NVQ. Quality assurance arrangements are comprehensive but there is no method for

    p.3

    evaluating their effectiveness. Performance targets are not set.

    p.3

    OCCUPATIONAL AREAS GRADE GENERIC AREAS GRADE Manufacturing 2 Equal opportunities 4 Trainee support 3 Management of training 2 Quality assurance 3

    p.3

    REINSPECTION GRADE Equal opportunities 3

    p.3

    KEY STRENGTHS ♦ careful planning of training to meet trainees’ needs in the workplace ♦ good training materials ♦ comprehensive induction programme ♦ inclusion of self-employed trainers in meetings and the staff appraisal process T R A I N I N G S T A N D A R D S C O U N C I L I N S P E C T I O N R E P O R T : D I D A C L I M I T E D J A N U A R Y 2 0 0 0 A D U L T L E A R N I N G I N S P E C T O R A T E R E I N S P E C T I O N A P R I L 2 0 0 1

    p.3

     Adult Learning Inspectorate ♦ comprehensive quality assurance arrangements

    p.4

    KEY WEAKNESSES ♦ unsatisfactory recording of assessments ♦ poor initial assessment ♦ slow progress towards achieving NVQs by trainees ♦ no routine monitoring of the effectiveness of policies and procedures T R A I N I N G S T A N D A R D S C O U N C I L I N S P E C T I O N R E P O R T : D I D A C L I M I T E D J A N U A R Y 2 0 0 0 A D U L T L E A R N I N G I N S P E C T O R A T E R E I N S P E C T I O N A P R I L 2 0 0 1

    p.4

     Adult Learning Inspectorate INTRODUCTION

    p.5

    1. Didac Limited (Didac) was established in 1997 as a private training company specialising in training and development of operatives in wood machining, furniture production and hand-crafted furniture. The company has three shareholding directors, two of whom work part time, and four self-employed assessors/trainers who also work part time. In August 1998, Somerset Training and Enterprise Council (TEC) contracted with the company to provide training leading to national vocational qualifications (NVQs) at level 2 and modern apprenticeships in furniture-related occupations. In October 1998, another specialist provider in the southwest of England ceased trading and Didac took over responsibility for the training of 18 trainees. In March 2001, Didac took responsibility for another 17 trainees from a national training provider who had ceased training. At the time of the original inspection, there were 29 trainees, of whom 14 were modern

    p.5

    apprentices and 15 were on work-based training programmes. There are now 38 trainees. Thirteen are advanced modern apprentices and 25 are on NVQ training programmes for young people. At reinspection, Didac has contracts with Somerset’s Local Learning and Skills Council (LLSC) for 22 trainees based in the Southwest, National Training Partnership (NTP) for two trainees based in the Southwest and NTP (Scotland) for the remaining 14 trainees. The company also provides specialist training and a consultancy service to other training companies, national organisations and employers. In July 2000, Didac achieved the Investors in People award.

    p.5

    2. Didac’s head office is in Bristol and, at the time of the original inspection, the trainees were employed in 10 companies based throughout the Southwest with over half the trainees working for three companies in Somerset. The number of employers has now risen to 17 throughout Great Britain. In November 1999, the unemployment rate in the Southwest was on average 3.6 per cent, compared with a national average of 4.8 per cent. By April 2001, the rate in the Southwest had fallen to 2.2 per cent and the national average was 3.3 per cent. Unemployment rates remain high in some rural areas of the region. The main occupational areas providing employment are agriculture and manufacturing. The proportion of school leavers in the Somerset TEC area achieving five or more general certificates of secondary education (GCSEs) at grade C and above was over 52 per cent in 1999, compared with the national average of 47.9 per cent. In 2000, the

    p.5

    proportion had risen to 55 per cent in Somerset and 49.2 per cent nationally. In the Southwest, less than 2 per cent of the population are from minority ethnic groups. T R A I N I N G S T A N D A R D S C O U N C I L I N S P E C T I O N R E P O R T : D I D A C L I M I T E D J A N U A R Y 2 0 0 0 A D U L T L E A R N I N G I N S P E C T O R A T E R E I N S P E C T I O N A P R I L 2 0 0 1

    p.5

     Adult Learning Inspectorate INSPECTION FINDINGS

    p.6

    3. Didac produced its first self-assessment report in April 1999. The report was reviewed twice and the managing director produced a third edition for the inspection. This included a contribution from the training director, following discussions with staff, employers and trainees. Inspectors agreed with some of the strengths and weaknesses but considered several strengths to be no more than normal practice. Inspectors found additional strengths and weaknesses and agreed with the grades given in the self-assessment report for the occupational area, management of training and quality assurance. Inspectors awarded lower grades for equal opportunities and trainee support than those given in the self-assessment report. Didac prepared a revised self-assessment report in December 2000 which identified its current strengths and weaknesses as well as giving the original strengths and weaknesses for comparison.

    p.6

    4. The original inspection was carried out by a team of two inspectors, who spent a total of eight days at Didac during January 2000. The inspectors visited nine of the 10 employers and interviewed 11 workplace supervisors and managers and 27 trainees. The inspectors reviewed trainees’ portfolios at their workplaces. A wide range of documents were examined, including the contract with the TEC, quality assurance manual and procedures manual, minutes of meetings, training materials, trainees’ files and records of data. The inspectors observed two assessments, two quarterly progress reviews and four training sessions.

    p.6

    5. The reinspection was carried out by a team of two inspectors, who spent a total of six days at Didac in April 2001. Inspectors visited five employers and interviewed 11 trainees and seven workplace supervisors and managers. Three of Didac’s staff were interviewed. Inspectors also examined trainees’ files, policies and procedures and analysis of data and questionnaires. Inspectors observed one trainee’s progress review.

    p.6

    Grades awarded to instruction sessions at the original inspection

    p.6

    GRADE 1 GRADE 2 GRADE 3 GRADE 4 GRADE 5 TOTAL

    p.6

    Grade 2

    6. Didac Training has a total of 29 trainees in this occupational area. Trainees work towards NVQ qualifications at level 2 and level 3 and these are summarised T R A I N I N G S T A N D A R D S C O U N C I L I N S P E C T I O N R E P O R T : D I D A C L I M I T E D J A N U A R Y 2 0 0 0 A D U L T L E A R N I N G I N S P E C T O R A T E R E I N S P E C T I O N A P R I L 2 0 0 1

    p.6

    Grade 2

     Adult Learning Inspectorate in the table below. All trainees are employed and all training and assessment takes place in the workplace. Didac staff visit trainees on one day every four weeks, and in some cases, once every two weeks. These training days at the employer’s premises are used for off-the-job training sessions, assessments and reviews. Four staff are self-employed trainers/assessors. They specialise in training leading to specific qualifications. In addition, the managing director and training manager carry out all the training and assessment in wood machining qualifications, as well as acting as internal verifiers. Didac staff use specialised training materials where appropriate, as well as the employers’ own resources. Since 1998, 12 trainees have left the programme. Six achieved their NVQ and nine remained with the same employers. The average NVQ achievement rate for manufacturing trainees in the

    p.7

    Grade 2

    Somerset TEC area is only 30 per cent. The self-assessment report identified a number of strengths that inspectors considered no more than normal practice and some weaknesses that were not significant. Inspectors agreed with the grade given in the self-assessment report.

    p.7

    Grade 2

    Qualification Level Modern Apprentices Work-based training for youth Wood machining 2

    p.7

    Grade 2

    Furniture Production (assembly) 2 3 1 Furniture Production (polishing) 2 1 2

    p.7

    Grade 2

    STRENGTHS ♦ adaptation of training to meet trainees’ needs in the workplace ♦ good training materials ♦ participation of trainees in international industry exhibition

    p.7

    Grade 2

    WEAKNESSES ♦ no formal plans for theory training sessions ♦ inadequate planning and recording of assessments

    p.7

    Grade 2

    7. There are good working relationships between supervisors, trainees and Didac staff. All training is provided in the workplace and employers are involved in all aspects of the training. Trainees carry out projects in order to develop the skills necessary to achieve the NVQ. These projects are adapted to suit the working methods and equipment used by the employers. All training takes place on the employers’ equipment. If an employer does not have the appropriate equipment to enable the trainee to cover the requisite range of NVQ competencies, the company T R A I N I N G S T A N D A R D S C O U N C I L I N S P E C T I O N R E P O R T : D I D A C L I M I T E D J A N U A R Y 2 0 0 0 A D U L T L E A R N I N G I N S P E C T O R A T E R E I N S P E C T I O N A P R I L 2 0 0 1

    p.7

    Grade 2

     Adult Learning Inspectorate will arrange for the trainee to receive training in another company that has. Additional practical learning support is readily available from experienced work- based supervisors. In some cases, employers have requested that trainees take additional NVQ units relevant to their production requirements. The training provided by Didac staff is based on practical activities linked to company production whenever possible. There are sufficient training resources to ensure good training is carried out. Training materials, in the form of handouts, contain excellent graphics, and are of outstanding quality. These materials are stored on computer and are accessible to all staff. Didac staff have designed the materials to meet the needs of trainees, the employers and comply with the industry regulations. The materials are being updated to incorporate key skills wherever possible. Trainees work in a responsible manner and are enthusiastic about the

    p.8

    Grade 2

    training. The interim period between training days is designed for trainees to work on their own and take responsibility for organising their own learning, during which they complete written or practical work set by the trainer. This is marked at the start of the next training day.

    p.8

    Grade 2

    8. Trainees are encouraged to use computers to generate evidence for their portfolio. Information technology training is planned at the larger companies as part of their training programme. A laptop computer is available for trainees. Trainees are encouraged to provide photographic evidence of work for their portfolios and a digital camera is available for this purpose. Trainees are also encouraged to enter national competitions. Two trainees have won prestigious awards. Trainees are also involved with an international industry exhibition where they demonstrate machinery to visiting delegates and produce pieces which are then sold to raise money for charity. This enables trainees to gain experience on new machines and with new technology and obtains additional evidence for their NVQ.

    p.8

    Grade 2

    9. Theory training is not planned systematically and trainers are uncertain when they should carry it out. Theory sessions were satisfactory. In many instances, trainers gave individual tuition, and questioned the trainees closely to make sure they understood what they were learning. The planning of assessments is neither systematic nor recorded. Assessments are usually arranged informally. The assessment methods are sound and appropriate but the assessments are not recorded in detail. Trainees are not usually given written feedback on their assessments. Trainees are unsure of when they are being formally assessed or which NVQ units they have achieved. Some trainees are not aware of the difference between training and assessment. In some cases, trainees do not know which of the projects have been used as a means of assessing their NVQ competencies. T R A I N I N G S T A N D A R D S C O U N C I L I N S P E C T I O N R E P O R T : D I D A C

    p.8

    Grade 2

    L I M I T E D J A N U A R Y 2 0 0 0 A D U L T L E A R N I N G I N S P E C T O R A T E R E I N S P E C T I O N A P R I L 2 0 0 1

    p.9

    Equal opportunities Grade 3

    10. Didac has an equal opportunities policy and a separate harassment policy, which are updated each year. Copies are given to all trainees during their induction and employers receive copies when the policies are updated. All trainees are employed and most employers have their own equal opportunities policies and procedures. There is a written grievance and complaints procedure set out in the procedures manual. There are additional guidance notes given to trainees and employers. There are currently no female trainees, no trainees from minority ethnic groups and no trainees with disabilities.

    p.9

    Equal opportunities Grade 3

    At the original inspection, the main weaknesses identified were: ♦ no specific action to promote recruitment from under-represented groups ♦ no training for staff on equal opportunities ♦ insufficient checks on employers’ upholding of equal opportunities during trainee recruitment ♦ no systematic analysis of data to measure effectiveness of policies

    p.9

    Equal opportunities Grade 3

    11. Didac has an action plan to promote the opportunities available in wood and allied industries. Marketing materials have been updated to promote equality of opportunity. The managing director attended an equal opportunities training day organised by the TEC. Information from the TEC’s event and from other sources were used during an internal equal opportunities training day for all staff and understanding of equal opportunities is now good. Employers’ recruitment practices are now checked and monitored. Data looking at the types of people in the industry are analysed, but no comparisons are made between employers or against national benchmarks. Didac’s self-assessment report identified the current strengths and the main weakness of lack of recruitment of under-represented groups. Some of the strengths in the self-assessment report were considered to be no more than normal practice and an additional weakness was identified by

    p.9

    Equal opportunities Grade 3

    inspectors. The grade awarded is the same as that given in the self-assessment report.

    p.9

    Equal opportunities Grade 3

    STRENGTHS ♦ effective monitoring and promotion of equal opportunities with employers ♦ regular monitoring of the effectiveness of the harassment policy

    p.9

    Equal opportunities Grade 3

    WEAKNESSES ♦ poor recruitment of under-represented groups ♦ insufficient equal opportunities training for trainees after induction T R A I N I N G S T A N D A R D S C O U N C I L I N S P E C T I O N R E P O R T : D I D A C L I M I T E D J A N U A R Y 2 0 0 0 A D U L T L E A R N I N G I N S P E C T O R A T E R E I N S P E C T I O N A P R I L 2 0 0 1

    p.9

    Equal opportunities Grade 3

     Adult Learning Inspectorate 12. Didac conducts an annual survey with employers to monitor the number and types of people working for each employer. In January 2001, the proportion of female production operatives working for employers was 2.6 per cent. The proportion of minority ethnic employees was 1.4 per cent, which reflects the proportion in the local population. Part of the survey includes collecting and analysing data on the number and type of applicants for each vacancy as well as the number and type of trainees recruited. When a woman applies for a vacancy and is not successful, the employers give reasons for the rejection. Didac provides additional support and practical guidance for employers on recruitment when required. One employer involves Didac in its recruitment process to ensure that all applicants are treated equally and are given an appropriate initial assessment. Individual training plans have been amended to promote and reinforce trainees and

    p.10

    Equal opportunities Grade 3

    employers’ responsibility for equal opportunities and health and safety. Employers are also given detailed and useful guidance notes, which include the employers’ responsibilities for equal opportunities and recruitment. The guidance notes have been updated and an additional booklet on diversity and harassment has recently been issued. Didac advises employers when they feel that materials displayed in workshops are offensive. Since the original inspection, one employer has removed all offensive materials and graffiti from the workshops and washroom areas.

    p.10

    Equal opportunities Grade 3

    13. Didac has a separate and comprehensive harassment policy and code of conduct for staff and trainees. Staff are given a copy of the policy as part of the quality assurance manual. Trainees have the policy explained to them during induction and have a good understanding of different types of harassment and bullying. Didac reviews the effectiveness of this policy by asking questions during trainees’ quarterly progress reviews. They are asked if they have been treated fairly and if there have been any instances of harassment or bullying in the workplace. The policy is also monitored through questionnaires which are completed by trainees every six months. All trainees feel they are treated fairly and equally and feel confident in discussing issues with Didac’s staff.

    p.10

    Equal opportunities Grade 3

    14. Didac has developed an action plan to promote equality of opportunity among under-represented groups. Specific schools have been identified and Didac has asked if presentations can be made to the pupils who are leaving school in the summer term. There has been no response from the schools as yet. All current trainees are men and there are no trainees from minority ethnic groups. This is traditional in the wood trade industries. There are no plans to work with specific employers to attract under-represented groups, especially women and trainees with disabilities. There has been no follow-up of applicants from under-represented groups who fail to attend interviews or leave after a work trial.

    p.10

    Equal opportunities Grade 3

    15. Trainees are given basic training on equal opportunities at induction, along with copies of policies and procedures. There is no additional training or development to increase their understanding of equal opportunities after induction. Trainees have a good level of understanding about harassment and bullying at work but only basic understanding of other issues relating to legislation and diversity. Didac recently issued new guidance notes on equal opportunities to T R A I N I N G S T A N D A R D S C O U N C I L I N S P E C T I O N R E P O R T : D I D A C L I M I T E D J A N U A R Y 2 0 0 0 A D U L T L E A R N I N G I N S P E C T O R A T E R E I N S P E C T I O N A P R I L 2 0 0 1

    p.10

    Equal opportunities Grade 3

     Adult Learning Inspectorate trainees but these have not been discussed in detail. Any training given with the new guidance notes has not been noted on visit reports. New training materials for key skills has been produced which include aspects of equal opportunities.

    p.11

    Trainee support Grade 3

    16. The company is not responsible for the selection and recruitment of trainees. Employers recruit and select trainees who are employed with them. The company carries out initial assessment using its own numeracy and literacy test. Induction takes place in the workplace and is carried out by company staff. It covers procedures, health and safety, equal opportunities and key skills. Further induction, especially in relation to health and safety, is also given in the workplace. Trainees receive support from supervisors in the workplace, and additional support from Didac staff on an informal basis. Inspectors considered many of the strengths stated in the self-assessment report to be no more than normal practice. They found one strength and one weakness the company had not identified.

    p.11

    Trainee support Grade 3

    STRENGTHS ♦ comprehensive induction for trainees ♦ availability of advice and guidance for trainees outside working hours ♦ effective process for providing trainees with work schedules after each training day

    p.11

    Trainee support Grade 3

    WEAKNESSES ♦ insufficiently rigorous initial assessment ♦ no systematic support for trainees with diverse needs ♦ failure to record trainees’ progress reviews in sufficient detail

    p.11

    Trainee support Grade 3

    17. Didac staff undertake a multi-stage induction process with their trainees in the workplace. The first induction is conducted by Didac staff, and covers procedures and equal opportunities, with particular attention given to health and safety and control of substances hazardous to health. The second stage is induction by the employer, during which company procedures are covered and the trainees’ awareness of the importance of health and safety and equal opportunities is reinforced. The trainees also receive a separate induction to the NVQ and key skills. A list of abbreviations for technical terms relating to the sector and NVQs is provided for trainees to help them understand their training programmes. Trainees said they could recall their induction and especially the information on health and safety which is given the highest priority. Trainees are given a booklet, which contains all relevant information and the telephone numbers of Didac staff.

    p.11

    Trainee support Grade 3

    T R A I N I N G S T A N D A R D S C O U N C I L I N S P E C T I O N R E P O R T : D I D A C L I M I T E D J A N U A R Y 2 0 0 0 A D U L T L E A R N I N G I N S P E C T O R A T E R E I N S P E C T I O N A P R I L 2 0 0 1

    p.12

    Trainee support Grade 3

     Adult Learning Inspectorate Trainees receive daily support from their workplace supervisors. Where there is a particular difficulty with a trainee, parents are invited to attend a meeting with the employer to resolve the problem. Trainees are also encouraged to telephone Didac staff for a private chat outside normal working hours, if they so wish. Some trainees have done so to resolve personal problems and work-related problems.

    p.12

    Trainee support Grade 3

    18. In some instances, qualifications and experience the trainees already have are recognised and recorded. Some trainees who have already completed units towards key skills have had these credited towards their qualifications. There are arrangements for the accreditation of trainees’ prior learning and three trainees are currently being credited with units towards their NVQ. The process for identifying and recognising trainees’ prior qualifications is not, however, sufficiently thorough. For example, company staff were unaware that one trainee held an NVQ in carpentry and joinery. They had, in consequence, taken no action to find out whether this trainee had already covered some of the units for his NVQ in cabinet making. The initial assessment process is not rigorous enough. A literacy and numeracy test designed by the company is given to all trainees, but results from these have not been analysed or evaluated. There is no specific test to assess

    p.12

    Trainee support Grade 3

    trainees’ key skill training needs. Trainees who need additional support are usually referred back to the TEC or careers service and no record of their name is kept. No member of staff has received training in teaching or assessing trainees with learning difficulties or other specific needs. There are no systematic arrangements for providing additional support for trainees.

    p.12

    Trainee support Grade 3

    19. Trainees receive a copy of their course report after every training day. This report details training and assessments completed and projects or work to be carried out before the next training day. The workplace supervisor is also given a copy. The trainees have a more formal quarterly review of the progress with Didac staff and their supervisor. Some of the records of these reviews do not give much detail on trainees’ progress. During the reviews, trainees are not set targets for achievement of their NVQ. Some trainees and their supervisors are uncertain of the extent of their progress or by what dates they must complete some, or all, of their NVQ units.

    p.12

    Management of training Grade 2

    20. Didac Limited employs one full-time and two part-time members of staff. The managing director is directly involved in all aspects of the company’s work including training and assessment of wood machining, internal verification, development of training materials and commercial courses. The training director works part time and co-ordinates the work of four self-employed specialist trainers/assessors. All staff have relevant occupational qualifications and experience. Both directors have obtained occupational safety and health certificates. All other staff undertake basic health and safety training as part of their induction. The company started working towards the Investors in People award in October 1999. The inspectors agreed with most of the strengths and T R A I N I N G S T A N D A R D S C O U N C I L I N S P E C T I O N R E P O R T : D I D A C L I M I T E D J A N U A R Y 2 0 0 0 A D U L T L E A R N I N G I N S P E C T O R A T E

    p.12

    Management of training Grade 2

    R E I N S P E C T I O N A P R I L 2 0 0 1

    p.13

    Management of training Grade 2

     Adult Learning Inspectorate weaknesses in the self-assessment report and also identified additional ones. They awarded the same grade as that given in the self-assessment report.

    p.13

    Management of training Grade 2

    STRENGTHS ♦ employers’ support for all training activities ♦ inclusion of self-employed trainers/assessors in staff appraisals and regular meetings ♦ sharing of staff expertise with other providers and industry

    p.13

    Management of training Grade 2

    WEAKNESSES ♦ failure to set down some procedures in writing ♦ some trainees’ slow progress towards achievement of the qualification

    p.13

    Management of training Grade 2

    21. Didac staff, employers and trainees work effectively as a team. The training programme is discussed carefully to ensure that it not only enables the trainees to cover all the requisite NVQ competencies, but also meets the needs of employers. The training given by Didac staff is co-ordinated with the training given by the workplace supervisors and experienced operatives. Employers ensure trainees are released for one-day of training every four weeks and give them time to carry out the activities they are set by the Didac staff at each visit. Many employers are fully involved in the training activities and these are well co-ordinated. Some employers have arranged for Didac to provide training for their staff related to specific NVQ units.

    p.13

    Management of training Grade 2

    22. All staff, including self-employed, part-time staff, are given an annual appraisal which is linked to staff development. All staff have achieved or are working towards, assessor qualifications. One trainer who is a specialist in cabinet making is being trained to teach wood machining. The training director recently achieved his key skill practitioners’ qualification. The training director and another trainer are taking the lead on helping the company achieve the Investors in People award. Two days a year are booked as training days for all staff. The last training day was used to discuss and develop training materials for different areas. Records are kept of staff qualifications and courses staff have attended. There is, however, no formal procedure for staff development and no records are kept of staff development activities. There are also no detailed written procedures for the selection and recruitment of staff, employers or trainees. Most of the staff are self-

    p.13

    Management of training Grade 2

    employed and communication with them is not always systematic. All staff are invited to attend a monthly meeting. They are kept updated on current developments and salient issues through memos and telephone discussions. Didac staff not only share their knowledge and expertise amongst themselves, but run courses and seminars for other training providers and employers. Didac ran a course for training providers on manual handling training. They also run courses on the provision and use of work equipment regulations, which were established in T R A I N I N G S T A N D A R D S C O U N C I L I N S P E C T I O N R E P O R T : D I D A C L I M I T E D J A N U A R Y 2 0 0 0 A D U L T L E A R N I N G I N S P E C T O R A T E R E I N S P E C T I O N A P R I L 2 0 0 1

    p.13

    Management of training Grade 2

     Adult Learning Inspectorate December 1998. The managing director assists the health and safety executive on matters relating to wood machining.

    p.14

    Management of training Grade 2

    23. Didac recently established a record card system for recording the units achieved by each trainee and to manage their progress. Trainees’ achievement rates are not systematically analysed to identify trends that may be taken into consideration in management decisions. Trainees’ progress is not always monitored with sufficient thoroughness. For example, management only recently became aware of a trainee who had been on the programme for 17 months and had not completed any NVQ units. Action has now been taken to rectify this situation. Trainees make slow progress towards achievement of wood machining qualifications. Even allowing for the fact that trainees have, for health and safety reasons, to be closely supervised, it is still taking as long as 15 months before the trainees are assessed for any part of the NVQ. Some trainees who have progressed from level 2 to level 3 over eight months ago have still not completed any of their

    p.14

    Management of training Grade 2

    level 3 units, even though they are working on specific projects.

    p.14

    Quality assurance Grade 3

    24. Didac limited has a quality assurance manual and a quality assurance procedures manual. The company’s quality assurance arrangements meet the requirements of the awarding bodies and the local TEC. Business targets and standards are set in line with contractual requirements. The managing director takes full responsibility for the quality assurance arrangements. The training director was involved in the preparation of the self-assessment report. Inspectors agreed with many of the strengths and weaknesses stated in the self-assessment report but considered that some of the weaknesses were not significant. They found strengths and weaknesses the company had not identified and awarded the same grade as that given in the self-assessment report.

    p.14

    Quality assurance Grade 3

    STRENGTHS ♦ comprehensive quality assurance arrangements ♦ effective action on trainees’ feedback and self-assessment findings ♦ frequent review and updating of training materials

    p.14

    Quality assurance Grade 3

    WEAKNESSES ♦ no systematic use of data on trainees’ achievements and destinations ♦ insufficient performance targets ♦ poor arrangements for internal verification sampling

    p.14

    Quality assurance Grade 3

    25. All staff have a copy of the quality assurance manual and operating T R A I N I N G S T A N D A R D S C O U N C I L I N S P E C T I O N R E P O R T : D I D A C L I M I T E D J A N U A R Y 2 0 0 0 A D U L T L E A R N I N G I N S P E C T O R A T E R E I N S P E C T I O N A P R I L 2 0 0 1

    p.14

    Quality assurance Grade 3

     Adult Learning Inspectorate procedures which they use on a regular basis. The quality assurance arrangements include a wide range of activities. Feedback is sought from trainees using questionnaires every six months. Questionnaires will also shortly be used to obtain more formal feedback from employers. Training materials are frequently reviewed and updated to reflect changes in technology and legislation. The company has a schedule to ensure one of the directors observes all members of staff carrying out training and assessments every quarter. The company has welcomed the opportunity to use the self-assessment process to enhance its quality assurance arrangements. The company is implementing an action plan it devised after the production of its self-assessment report. There have been two significant improvements following self-assessment and action on trainees’ feedback. Training days used to be every six weeks and they have been changed to every

    p.15

    Quality assurance Grade 3

    four weeks to give the trainees more opportunity to develop specific skills. Some trainees felt they were not changing jobs frequently enough to enable them to cover all the requisite NVQ competencies. Didac has worked with the employer to develop a schedule so that the trainees change jobs every month. The trainees and their supervisors use the schedule to plan activities and to ensure that the trainees master all the machines and processes in each area.

    p.15

    Quality assurance Grade 3

    26. Didac collects data on trainees’ achievements and destinations of trainees. It does not analyse the data systematically to establish key issues or trends. The training director has established a process for recording achievement rates but these are reviewed only at the end of the contract year. There is no regular or systematic review of the destination of trainees. Staff have not taken specific action to improve trainees’ retention rates. The company monitors its performance against the TEC contract targets. The only performance target the company has set itself is an NVQ achievement rate of 80 per cent. In 1998-99, the achievement rate was 100 per cent. Currently, however, the trainees’ achievement rate is only 50 per cent. The company does not set interim targets against which it can monitor its own performance, and that of the trainees.

    p.15

    Quality assurance Grade 3

    27. The internal verification process is well established and well used. Checks are not made, however, to ensure that the sampling of assessment is comprehensive or appropriate. Internal verification of assessment by new or trainee assessors is insufficiently frequent. There is no systematic planning of assessment sampling.

    p.15

    Discuss this inspection

    Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

    Join the discussion