Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
DE14 3RL
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes2
“Employers are kept well informed of progress.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 3
- Words of findings
- 832
- about usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 43, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 1
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Alexandra House 33 Kingsway Holborn London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mr Jon Vincent Assistant Principal Burton College Lichfield Street Burton on Trent Staffordshire DE14 3RL
p.1
Sector Skills Area 04– Engineering and manufacturing technology
Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation during my visit on 25 and 26 January. I am particularly grateful to teaching and other staff for all their hard work in preparing the programme and background documentation and giving up a great deal of their time during the visit. Please pass on my thanks to staff and students who gave up their time to talk to me.
p.1
Sector Skills Area 04– Engineering and manufacturing technology
The visit provided much useful evidence for the good practice survey. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but should we wish to cite specific aspects of practice we will contact the college first. College letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term and copied to the LSC. The letters will also be available to the next inspection team to visit the college and to inform your AAV visits.
p.1
Sector Skills Area 04– Engineering and manufacturing technology
The evidence used to inform the judgements made included interviews with staff and students, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of students’ work and observation of four lessons.
p.1
Sector Skills Area 04– Engineering and manufacturing technology
I have provided below a summary of my observations, the good practice seen and suggested areas for development.
p.1
Good practice observed included:
Improving success rates, with the success rate in 05-06 for adult learners well above the national average and that for learners aged 16-18 close to the average. High success rates for work based learners. Success rates on advanced apprenticeship programmes in 2005-06 were 65% compared to the national framework rate of 49 per cent. Similarly, success rates on apprenticeship programmes in 2005-06 were 77% compared to the national framework rate of 51 per cent. Marked improvement in key skills success rates. College data shows that the overall success rate in engineering is well above the national average. All the lessons observed were of good quality. Strengths included:
p.1
Good practice observed included:
o high attendance; 93% on average o enthusiastic and knowledgeable teachers who planned their teaching carefully; they have a good rapport with learners, are patient and clear in their explanations and move the learning on at a pace which is appropriate to all the learners; teachers’ and learners own specialist knowledge is used well to interest and motivate the learners who respond positively to the teaching. o excellent use of ILT in support of learning; good links are made, during the teaching, with industrial application to illuminate the teaching; interactive whiteboards are used productively; in one lesson sectioned illustrations of pneumatic and hydraulic components and video clips of sectioned components were particularly well used o lessons are planned well and include the consideration of learning support needs o lesson generally include a good range of activity and are well supported, for example, by additional staff, visual aids, hand-
p.2
Good practice observed included:
outs, and demonstration equipment; group work was included in most of the lessons observed; demonstration and visual aids are used particularly well; there is a good mix of hand-outs, note-taking, and computer projected notes
p.2
Good practice observed included:
Excellent partnerships with schools and industry. For example, training is delivered at in-company learning centres in JCB and Toyota, and bespoke training is developed and delivered to suit company needs. These links help to develop and maintain the resource base through donations of equipment and vehicles. Manufacturers donate valuable capital equipment to the department. Good arrangements with local secondary schools enable school students to sample the provision. Effective involvement of employers in curriculum development. Employers, for example are fully involved in the design of the curriculum through the employers forum group for engineering and applied science. Good commitment to CPD activities. Activity includes industrial placement, secondments and commercial training courses to ensure staff skills are updated regularly. Employers provide secondments and manufacturers courses to college staff.
p.2
Good practice observed included:
Some excellent facilities to support learning. Motor vehicle workshops and the advanced manufacturing centre particularly are well resourced and much of the equipment is up to date and reflects good industry standards. The quality of the accommodation and resources in Motor Vehicle is very good. Full-time and work-based learners’ progress is monitored closely and progress is available through the shared drive. Employers are kept well informed of progress.
p.3
feedback, included:
checking of learners’ knowledge and understanding. For example the answers to teachers questions were dominated by a few learners, and insufficient use is made of questioning to assess the learning that is taking place the use of the internet to improve learning. This is at an early stage of development use of data to monitor performance. For example key skills data were difficult to obtain and trends in success rates are not sufficiently well considered some aspects of planning. For example schemes of work do not identify sufficiently the opportunities to develop key skills and lesson plans don’t give detail on how teaching is to be matched to the higher or lower attaining learner.
p.3
feedback, included:
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop engineering and manufacturing courses.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion