Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 22 Jun 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Name on report verified

    ANNUAL ASSESSMENT VISIT: MAIN FINDINGS

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+76Very positivemore positive than 77% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongoutstandinggood progressmake good progresseffectiveimprovedrigorouspositive
Criticismyet tonot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1024w+69
  • What needs to improve129w+69

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,142
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 36, typical 45
Average sentence
22 words
Next steps
7
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 89%What needs to improve 11%

Full report text

Date of visit: 22 May 2007

This feedback contains brief findings from the annual assessment visit. It focuses on the themes explored during the visit and does not attempt to give a comprehensive overview of the college’s performance.

p.1

applied to measure students’ levels of literacy and numeracy?

 The college has explored possible external accreditation for those learners who are studying at level 1, or who want to carry on to level 1 or above when progressing from the college. Arrangements are being put in place for next academic year. The college uses the national core curriculum as the starting point for assessing learners and augments these findings with practical activities in order to determine their starting points.

p.1

progress against expected achievements?

 The college judged that students achieved well in 2006/07 and awarded a grade 2 (good) for this aspect. In support of this grade, and in addition to data on the acquisition of external qualifications, graphical data was presented on the progress made by each student at every half term over three years, measured against 31 assessment criteria. The college is considerably refining its system for measuring incremental progress across all areas of the curriculum, from students’ point of entry to the college to their departure. This analysis will be complete by the end of July 2007. It is producing a very accessible, clear and comprehensive way of seeing and evaluating progress, highlighting for staff particular areas for development for each student. The system has yet to be evaluated for its impact, but it is already evident that it is a powerful tool that can signal the efficacy of, for example, particular teaching and learning styles; it also has the capacity to enable

p.1

progress against expected achievements?

staff to develop for students longer-term goals that are better informed by their prior progress. Furthermore, it enables the college to analyse and monitor progress against each criterion by gender, age, ethnicity, behavioural disorder (as assessed and identified at point of entry) and clinical condition. The system also improves the college’s capacity to map students’ personal and social development to the core curriculum of literacy and numeracy. Occupational therapy and physiotherapy assessments are also developing alongside these core skills assessments, focusing specifically on the progress of conceptual, cognitive and fine motor skills. Much of this cross-referencing analysis has yet to be done, but the inputting of data has made good progress to date.

p.2

progress against expected achievements?

 Students’ individual learning plans are a good basis for monitoring progress but are underdeveloped in some respects. They set individual goals in an informed and effective way, and break these down into incremental learning steps. They do not project or define the necessary next steps for students’ development, nor do they set clear, time-based expectations for students. This further enhancement of learning plans is being developed alongside the refinement of the system for measuring progress and achievement outlined above. Students have a high degree of ownership of the learning plans, and the college uses a variety of means to enable them to articulate their own progress, needs and ambitions. The college continues to make good progress towards ensuring that students conduct themselves with independence and confidence during their reviews.

p.2

monitoring and improving the quality of teaching and learning?

 The graded lesson observation scheme is thorough and well established. It is imaginatively applied to a wide range of significant structured encounters between staff and students, so a good range of activities are observed and graded. Findings point to a reduction in 2005/06 of instances of unsatisfactory lessons and an increase of lessons graded good or outstanding. Some 30 graded questions are used to ensure a consistent approach but the observation team is still being trained and the use of external moderation is in early stages of development. Staff particularly appreciate the strong emphasis put upon reflection and evaluation during their discussions following a graded observation. The college has not analysed the findings of the observation scheme in order to arrive at an evaluative account of what constitutes satisfactory, good or outstanding teaching and learning for its particular profile of students.

p.2

and numeracy improved?

 The college has improved its arrangements for monitoring literacy and numeracy. Progress in relation to the goals identified in each activity are recorded daily, and the outcomes collated by the literacy and numeracy tutor who sees each learner individually for one session a week. The outcomes are discussed and new goals agreed where appropriate. The teaching and tutorial files are monitored, but records are not kept of the sample used.

p.3

and improvement arrangements?

 The quality and standards committee has been strengthened and is now rigorous in its scrutiny of all facets of the college’s performance. The committee includes the principal of a large neighbouring tertiary college. The work of the committee is having a strong positive impact on the focus put upon quality assurance by all parts of the college.

p.3

equality of opportunity and diversity?

 The college seeks to help students engage more fully with the wider community, particularly with those sectors who are under-represented in the student community itself. It increasingly takes them beyond the confines of its own environment on trips, to work experience placements and in structured life skills sessions. Frequent visitors to the college expose students to people of different age, social and class backgrounds, ethnic heritage and physical ability. The college actively seeks to recruit more students and more staff from minority ethnic heritage and more males, but both the student and the staff populations remain very largely white British female.

p.3

teaching workforce?

 The director provides strong leadership in creating good opportunities for staff to expand and integrate their skills, to share knowledge and information and to trust each other more in their discourse about students. The college embraces the philosophy that all staff are involved in the education and personal growth of students, and works hard to integrate care, education and support functions.

p.4

teaching workforce?

 The college has now developed its staff database and has a record of staff qualifications and training. Outcomes from supervision meetings and observations contribute to the planning of staff development. Progress is being made on improving the qualifications of teachers. Half of the teaching staff currently have, or are working towards, appropriate teaching qualifications, and the college expects all staff to be appropriately qualified by 2010. Those appointed to teaching posts are now expected to have teaching qualifications before starting to work at the college. Almost half of the staff have literacy and numeracy qualifications at level 2 or 3, but no-one currently has a level 4 qualification. All staff recruited follow a disability course and three teachers have specific degree level qualifications for teaching people with disabilities.

p.4

Are health and safety procedures and actions properly recorded?

 All health and safety policies and procedures, including risk assessments, are properly recorded and kept centrally in a single file.

p.4

(Amendment) Act?

 The college’s Race Equality plan was updated in October 2006 and is fully compliant with statutory requirements. It has been adopted and approved within the last year by the quality and standards committee.

p.5

(Amendment) Act?

information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion