Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 May 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Alex Falconer

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Alex Falconer

  • Postcode verified

    SO22 6RX

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+81Very positivemore positive than 95% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingvery highconfidentvery wellimprovedeffectivegood progresswell planned
Criticismweaknessesnot outstandingnot clear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings961w+81
  • What needs to improve83w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,027
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 48
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 92%What needs to improve 8%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway Holborn London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr Neil Hopkins Principal Peter Symonds College Owens Road Winchester Hampshire SO22 6RX

p.1

Sector Skills Area: 2 Science and mathematics post-16

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation during my visit on 12 and 13 October. I am grateful to your staff for all their work in preparing the programme and background documentation and giving up their time during the visit. Please pass on my thanks to staff and learners who also gave up their time.

p.1

Sector Skills Area: 2 Science and mathematics post-16

The visit provided much useful evidence for the good practice survey in science. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but should we wish to cite specific aspects of practice we will contact the college first. All college letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Sector Skills Area: 2 Science and mathematics post-16

The evidence used to inform judgements included: interviews with staff and learners, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of learners’ work and observation of five lessons.

p.1

Sector Skills Area: 2 Science and mathematics post-16

I agreed to provide a summary of my observations of good practice seen in the sciences and to suggest some areas for development.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Standards are outstanding and achievements remain very good. Retention is outstanding and has been significantly above national benchmarks in biology, chemistry, physics and psychology for the past three years. This represents a considerable commitment to complete studies by a large number of young people. It also reflects the very good support and teaching the students receive.  GCE A and AS pass rates are also outstanding and were well above the national average in 2006. Of particular note were the proportions of high grades (A and B) which have been well above national averages for the past three years. Pass rates have improved considerably over four years in human biology and in 2006 in environmental science. Overall, success rates are very high and significantly above the national benchmarks.  Value added data for GCE A level sciences are good and indicate that students achieve above that predicted from their previous attainment.

p.1

Achievement and standards

The picture is less clear for AS where students’ progress is at or just above that predicted. Again some dramatic changes for the better have been recorded in human biology and environmental science.

p.2

How effective are teaching, training and learning?

 Teaching and learning are very good with some outstanding aspects. Lessons are well prepared and engage the students in an interesting and relevant variety of learning activities.  Science teachers are confident users of information and communication technology (ICT) both in the preparation and delivery of their lessons. Electronic whiteboards are effectively used with microscopes, statistics software, animations and other internet downloads to bring relevant and interesting learning materials into the laboratory. In one lesson a first year physics student’s query on the college intranet was used as revision for second year students and led to students agreeing to respond to the query in full.  Teachers are confident in their subject knowledge and are skilful in relating activities to assessment outcomes. There is much good humour in lessons and the pace is brisk and busy. However, in a small minority of lessons, teachers assume that all the students have

p.2

How effective are teaching, training and learning?

understood and move on too quickly. Standards are very high and students make very good progress.  Assessments are well planned and students’ progress rigorously tracked and monitored.

p.2

How well are learners guided and supported?

 Support and guidance are key strengths of the science departments. Teaching and learning are organised so that effective support, both informal and formal, are integral parts of the student experience. Tracking, monitoring and assessment are rigorous and backed up by well organised records. The result is that students are confident about their progress, know how to improve and speak positively about their target grades. Regular reviews are both useful and productive.  ICT is increasingly used to communicate between students and staff. For example in 2004 psychology students logged on to the departmental intranet at the rate of 300 visits per month; in 2006 visits are now at 3000 per month. Departmental intranets contain useful links to websites along with past examination papers, mark schemes and the opportunity to pose questions and receive answers.  But above all the workshops run by the teachers are the most effective

p.2

How well are learners guided and supported?

support mechanism. All students, and not just those falling behind or experiencing difficulties with their studies, are actively encouraged to attend subject specific workshops that run throughout the week. As a result many students use them to complete assignments and to seek help in ensuring they make good progress. Students speak very highly of the workshops and the support they receive from teaching staff.

p.3

achievement and supporting all learners?

 Leadership and management are outstanding. The science departments have confident, reflective teams who are proud of their work and set high standards. The science teams are well led and have demonstrated their capacity to improve. For example, close analysis of weaknesses and determined action have brought about significant improvements to retention and achievement rates in human biology and environmental science. Data on retention and achievements is very well collected and analysed centrally. This ensures that there is a consistent approach to evaluations for quality assurance purposes.  Environmental science is now taught in the main science block following some well thought out accommodation changes.  Departmental SARs are concise and evaluative and contain clear development plans. However, some do not put enough emphasis on how managers will continue to develop teaching and learning or how value added at AS could be further improved. In addition, the lesson

p.3

achievement and supporting all learners?

observation system has awarded no outstanding grades in the sciences over three years. Given that the sciences were judged to be outstanding at the last inspection and success rates continue to be very high, a proportion of the teaching in the science may very well be outstanding.

p.3

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

 use of the full scale of grades when observing lessons  encourage a more strategic view in the leadership and management section of subject self assessment reports.

p.3

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop science courses in the college. As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your LLSC and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion