Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 20 Jul 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Geoff Hancock

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Geoff Hancock

  • Postcode verified

    TR18 2TG

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

0Mixedmore positive than 24% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
14
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
—
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 2%About the inspection 98%

Full report text

Mr Roderick James The Headteacher Humphry Davy School Coombe Road Penzance Cornwall TR18 2TG

p.1

Ofsted Monitoring of Grade 3 Schools

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when I visited your school on 9 July 2007, for the time you gave to our phone discussions, and for the information which you provided before and during my visit. I would particularly like to thank the students and the staff for freely giving of their time at such a busy time.

p.1

Ofsted Monitoring of Grade 3 Schools

This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website. Please inform the Regional Inspection Service Provider of any factual inaccuracies within 24 hours of the receipt of this letter.

p.1

Ofsted Monitoring of Grade 3 Schools

As a result of the inspection in June 2006, the school was asked to: raise standards and improve achievement, particularly for the more able pupils; establish clear lines of accountability; monitor teaching and learning systematically and rigorously; and, share good practice in teaching and departmental self-evaluation within the school and from outside it.

p.1

Ofsted Monitoring of Grade 3 Schools

Having considered all the evidence, I am of the opinion that at this time the school is making satisfactory progress in addressing the issues for improvement and in raising the pupils’ achievements.

p.1

Ofsted Monitoring of Grade 3 Schools

The 2006 results at Year 9 were very encouraging, with a substantial improvement in standards and achievement in English. Overall progress from Year 7 to Year 9 is good. However, results in the 2006 examinations at Year 11 were worse than 2005 and the students underachieved. The school’s predictions for 2007 suggest that the GCSE results are likely to be close to those achieved in 2006. This confirms that, whilst standards are no longer falling, students are still underachieving. The school now has the capacity to identify students who are underachieving and a programme of intervention for targeted students in Years 9 and 11 demonstrates the new focus Tribal Group 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0845 123 6001 F 0845 123 6002 T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk the school has on maximising achievement. The school has put in place an extensive programme of support and challenge for the more able students, a group who were

p.1

Ofsted Monitoring of Grade 3 Schools

identified as underachieving at the time of the last inspection. There is a gifted and talented coordinator in place and subject leaders are making explicit provision for them both in lessons and in schemes of work. Whilst this is not fully embedded throughout the school, subjects such as science and English have rewritten learning programmes to ensure that all students are adequately challenged.

p.2

Ofsted Monitoring of Grade 3 Schools

The school leaders, with guidance from the local authority and support from a very effective associate deputy headteacher, have put in place a robust system for monitoring and evaluating teaching and learning. Central to the success of this has been identifying and clarifying clear lines of accountability, so that all leaders and teachers know precisely where their responsibilities lie. This new management structure is already having an impact upon the way the school operates. For instance, the mentoring system that was in its infancy at the time of the last inspection has now become part of the custom and practice of the school and mentors work effectively with subject teachers to support and challenge students. Students value the close support they receive and there is now a clear understanding of the roles and responsibilities of all staff who have leadership responsibility. The learning communities, which had been created to replace the old departmental

p.2

Ofsted Monitoring of Grade 3 Schools

leadership just before the last inspection, are now more established. However, the senior leaders recognise that, whilst there has been progress in many areas, the full impact of the changes is yet to be fully evaluated. In large communities such as ‘Topaz,’ which includes science, technology and art, significant support from the senior leadership team is still needed to ensure that the desired improvements are delivered.

p.2

Ofsted Monitoring of Grade 3 Schools

At the time of the last inspection the school’s management was judged to be inadequate because the systems that it used to monitor its own performance were weak and, as a result, there was huge variation across the school. Since this time the school has put in place a robust system that has completely changed the way that the school evaluates itself. The new directors of learning communities now work within a rigorous structure of self review and are closely monitored and supported by the headteacher and deputy headteacher. All staff have been extensively trained in the use of data to analyse performance and, as a result, there is a much greater understanding of the impact that teaching is having on students’ learning. A system for lesson observation and the review of students’ work is in place that clearly reflects the new culture of the school. In addition to a bi-annual review of the learning community by the senior leadership team, directors of learning communities

p.2

Ofsted Monitoring of Grade 3 Schools

are buddied up to share best practice and carry out peer review. All aspects of self- review are now rigorously followed through. As a result of this self-evaluation, the school now has an accurate understanding of its strengths and weaknesses and more accurate data with which to assess the performance of students. Because this new culture of self-evaluation is still relatively new, inconsistencies in its application still remain. However, the effectiveness of the school’s procedures is now satisfactory. I am copying this letter to the chair of governors and the Director of Education for Cornwall. This letter will also be posted on the Ofsted website.

p.2

Ofsted Monitoring of Grade 3 Schools

I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your school.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion