Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 15 Jun 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Keith Boulnois

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Keith Boulnois

  • Postcode verified

    B91 1SB

Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−46Criticalmore positive than 5% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveimproving
Criticismat riskinsufficientabsence

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings283w−7
  • What needs to improve82w−50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
2
Words of findings
355
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 48
Average sentence
15 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 78%What needs to improve 22%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway Holborn London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms B Sheils Principal Solihull College Blossomfield Campus Solihull West Midlands B91 1SB

p.1

Sector Skills Area 3: Agriculture, horticulture and animal care

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation during my visit on 26 February. I am particularly grateful to the teaching staff for all their hard work in preparing the programme and background documentation and giving up a great deal of their time during the visit. Please pass on my thanks to staff and learners who gave up their time to talk to me.

p.1

Sector Skills Area 3: Agriculture, horticulture and animal care

The visit provided much useful evidence for the good practice subject survey in agriculture, horticulture and animal care. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but should we wish to include specific aspects of practice we will contact the college first. All college letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Sector Skills Area 3: Agriculture, horticulture and animal care

The evidence used to inform judgements included: interviews with staff and learners, scrutiny of relevant documentation and observation of good practice examples.

p.1

Sector Skills Area 3: Agriculture, horticulture and animal care

I agreed to provide a summary of my observations of good practice seen in animal care, horticulture and floristry and to suggest some areas for development.

p.1

Good practice observed included:

 good and extensive use of innovative teaching and learning activities on animal care courses  good quality e-learning materials for the National Diploma Animal Care students  good practical project work  good teaching of equality and diversity in the tutorial programme  work placements are well integrated into teaching  good use of “Faculty Days” to share good practice amongst staff  effective ‘student at risk’ system aimed at improving attendance and retention, that is showing evidence of impact.

p.1

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

 underdeveloped teaching of environmental sustainability on all courses  insufficient use of formal industry advisory panels  the absence of a formal teaching and learning strategy.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop land-based courses in the college.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your LLSC and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion