Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 15 Jun 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    PO19 1SB

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+80Very positivemore positive than 94% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseeffectiveimprovedsuccessfulenthusiasmclear

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings634w+80
  • What needs to improve181w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
799
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 31, typical 48
Average sentence
27 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 78%What needs to improve 22%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway Holborn London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Dr R Parker Principal Chichester College Westgate Fields Chichester West Sussex PO19 1SB

p.1

Sector Skills Area 3: Agriculture, horticulture and animal care

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation during my visit on 7 March. I am particularly grateful to the land-based teaching staff for all their hard work in preparing the programme and background documentation and giving up a great deal of their time during the visit. Please pass on my thanks to staff and learners who gave up their time to talk to me.

p.1

Sector Skills Area 3: Agriculture, horticulture and animal care

The visit provided much useful evidence for the good practice subject survey in agriculture, horticulture and animal care. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but should we wish to include specific aspects of practice we will contact the college first. All college letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Sector Skills Area 3: Agriculture, horticulture and animal care

The evidence used to inform judgements included: interviews with staff and learners, scrutiny of relevant documentation, lesson observations and observation of good practice examples.

p.1

Sector Skills Area 3: Agriculture, horticulture and animal care

I agreed to provide a summary of my observations of good practice seen in land-based provision and to suggest some areas for development.

p.1

Good practice observed included:

 much improved success rates resulting from increased awareness and use of performance data to track students’ progress, careful curriculum planning to ensure that courses match student needs and abilities and increased accountability for the quality of courses and student performance by course leaders and middle managers  the use of effective and standardised practices through the ‘Chichester Learning Model’ to improve the quality of lesson planning and to place high emphasis on learning within lessons  good strategies to improve the teaching of theory through clear identification of learning objectives, well-structured teaching with plenty of emphasis on student involvement in learning, careful timetabling to ensure a productive balance and link between theory and practical lessons and creative and imaginative use of teaching techniques such as games and quizzes to enliven theory subjects  effective sharing of good practice through staff development sessions

p.1

Good practice observed included:

including regular ‘spotlight’ sessions where staff bring and share ideas about and approaches to successful teaching techniques  effective promotion of the use of information and learning technology (ILT) through the proactive work of an ILT champion and a willingness and enthusiasm amongst teachers to learn and use new techniques  good use of timed tasks and exercises in lessons to ensure that students remain focused and to increase the level of challenge to complete work at a realistic pace  the use of relevant and meaningful tasks in lessons that ensure that students are fully involved in the work of the college land-based operations in a realistic working environment  good curriculum development including maintaining a broad land- based curriculum, the provision of level 1 courses in all land-based subject areas, very productive work with schools and maximising links with other curriculum areas within the college

p.2

Good practice observed included:

 productive collaboration with a number of schools, including the provision of ‘Waterwise’ gardens in conjunction with Southern Water in five secondary schools, links with specials schools and provision for vulnerable and excluded pupils  a well-established lesson observation scheme which includes the effective use of external observers working in conjunction with college- based observers to produce a realistic and helpful view of the quality of teaching and learning  good strategic planning and implementation of action points in relation to the development of the estate and animal resources including the promotion of modern agricultural practices such as the production of meat boxes using college-produced meat including from outdoor pigs  the implementation of two CoVEs in land-based provision, one in horticultural technology and one in rural enterprise, both of which contribute well to land-based courses but also to local and regional

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

 further development of the use of ILT, including promoting its use outside of lessons by students and the development of systems for holding animal records electronically  promoting environmental awareness and good practice over an above where this occurs naturally in the curriculum, and spreading the good practice in promoting the principles of environmental sustainability that exists in some subjects, such as agriculture, more widely throughout all areas, especially animal care and equine studies  establishing a minimum target grade for each student at the start of their course to help motivate them and to assist in measuring the progress they make  further integration of key skills work into lessons and maximising the opportunities that arise in practical tasks to develop these skills fully.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop land-based courses in the college.

p.3

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your LLSC and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion