Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 15 Jun 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Paul Joyce

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Paul Joyce

  • Postcode verified

    FY2 0HB

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+90Very positivemore positive than 97% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisestrongexcellentmake good progresswell plannedimprovedimprovingrobustpositive

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings648w+89
  • What needs to improve62w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
701
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 91%What needs to improve 9%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway Holborn London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms Pauline Waterhouse Principal Blackpool & the Fylde College Ashfield Road Bispham Blackpool Lancashire FY2 0HB

p.1

Sector Skills Area 5 – Construction

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation during my visit on 07 and 08 February 2007. I am particularly grateful to you and all your staff for the hard work that took place to prepare for the visit and for giving up a great deal of time during the visit to meet with me. Please pass on my thanks to all those concerned.

p.1

Sector Skills Area 5 – Construction

This visit is part of a series to provision in SSA 5 graded good or better at its most recent inspection, in order to evaluate how good practice has been brought about, further improved and sustained. The visit provided much useful evidence for the good practice survey in construction. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but should we wish to cite specific aspects of practice we will contact the college first. All letters, following survey visits, will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Sector Skills Area 5 – Construction

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: lesson observations; interviews with staff and learners; scrutiny of the examples of good practice provided including a tour of resources. I agreed to provide a summary of the observations of good practice seen and to suggest some areas for development.

p.1

Good practice observed

 The particularly good support for learners. This is a strong feature of the college and learners benefit from a wide range of support mechanisms. Additional support is good and is accessed by a significant number of learners. Support staff work well with construction teachers to ensure that learners make good progress. Learners are supported well in both workshop and classroom lessons.  The strong focus on improving provision. There is clear leadership and strong management of construction provision. The monitoring of performance and the subsequent analysis, evaluation and action planning are robust. Useful staff development has had a positive impact on teaching and learning and has contributed to improving success rates.  The well planned theory teaching. Learning outcomes are clearly defined and teachers use a variety of strategies to encourage learner participation and engagement. Theory teaching is very closely linked to

p.1

Good practice observed

related practical activities.  The good development of learners practical skills. Learners benefit from gaining skills over and above qualification requirements which are valued by employers in the workplace. The standard of work produced by many learners is high.  The good progression into industry employment or further training. Many learners gain employment within the industry during the period of, or at the end of their course. A significant number of learners also progress to further training, to a course at a higher level or to other courses to broaden their industry skills and knowledge.  The extensive curriculum offer. The college offers a wide range of construction courses with a particularly good entry level offer. Progression opportunities exist from one level to the next and courses are available on a full and part-time basis. A wide range of both construction crafts and technical and professional courses are offered.

p.2

Good practice observed

 The good provision for 14-16 year olds. There are beneficial links with local schools and the college provides opportunities for school pupils to gain a valuable insight into construction education and training. They are able to gain a basic qualification and many progress onto post-16 construction courses.  The excellent engagement and involvement with local and regional initiatives for the benefit of learners. The college and the construction department are key partners in a number of regeneration initiatives within the community. This enables the college to be well represented and placed to ensure that any future courses are planned to take account of local need and to enable learners to benefit from the planned regeneration activities.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

 to more effectively coordinate and monitor work-based learning programmes to improve framework completion rates.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop construction provision in the college. As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your LLSC. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion