Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 18 May 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Chris Green

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Chris Green

  • Postcode verified

    DH4 4TL

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+89Very positivemore positive than 97% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellenteffectivestrongclearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings788w+89
  • What needs to improve70w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
844
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 48
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
5
typical 2
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 92%What needs to improve 8%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway Holborn, London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Ms Angela O'Donoghue Principal City of Sunderland College Success Road Philadelphia Houghton-le-Spring Sunderland DH4 4TL

p.1

Sector Skills Area 04– Engineering and manufacturing technology

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation during my visit on 29 and 30 January 2007. I am particularly grateful to teaching and other staff for all their hard work in preparing the programme and background documentation and giving up a great deal of their time during the visit. Please pass on my thanks to staff and students who gave up their time to talk to me.

p.1

Sector Skills Area 04– Engineering and manufacturing technology

The visit provided much useful evidence for the good practice survey. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but should we wish to cite specific aspects of practice we will contact the college first. College letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term and copied to the LSC. The letters will also be available to the next inspection team to visit the college and to inform your AAV visits.

p.1

Sector Skills Area 04– Engineering and manufacturing technology

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and students, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of students’ work and observation of three lessons (a fourth observation was out of scope of an engineering survey but informed the comments on Blackboard VLE).

p.1

Sector Skills Area 04– Engineering and manufacturing technology

I said I would provide a summary of my observations and of the good practice seen and to suggest areas for development.

p.1

Good practice observed

 The provisional data provided by the college shows the success rates are high. They are above the national average at levels 1, 2 and 3 on programmes for learners aged 16 -18, and at levels 2 and 3 on adult programmes.  The good standard of students’ work in practical projects, assignments and portfolios.  Aspects of teaching and learning

p.1

Good practice observed

o Effective use of information and learning technology to support the teaching of theory. In one lesson students accessed dedicated motor vehicle learning programmes that allow the students to break down assemblies to component parts and to animate the parts to simulate movement within the assembly, in this case a clutch assembly. The students then answered questions on clutch systems using remote controllers to input answers to multi-choice questions in real time with responses displayed on the interactive white board. o Good application of theory to practical assignments was observed in a national certificate in electronics lesson. Students, using programmable controllers assigned numbers to input/output devices, verifying the program and running realistic engineering programmes. Excellent follow-up assignments then related the exercise to work-related projects which linked theory to practical application, integrated the key

p.2

Good practice observed

skills of numeracy in calculations, communications in report writing and information technology in a power point presentation of the projects’ findings. o Excellent development of skills in a national diploma lesson where students used suitable computer aided design packages to produce drawings in 3D and learned to program computer controlled lathes, mills or routers to produce a complex model of a van. o Good lesson plans and schemes of work which include ways of differentiating the teaching and suitable forms of assessment. o Learners work well, individually, in groups, and in class discussions.

p.2

Good practice observed

 The wide and flexible range of provision, from level 1 through to level 4 in mechanical, electrical, and electronic engineering, and entry to level 3 in motor vehicle engineering. Courses are delivered through modes of attendance and in places which suit the needs of learners, employers and schools. For example, NVQs in Manufacturing are delivered on employers’ sites.  A wide range of guidance and recruitment procedures. These are provided through focused advertising in the local press and media, school visits, telephone contact advisors, one to one interviews, open days with advice given by engineering curriculum staff.  Thorough initial assessment and induction for fulltime learners. Induction includes enrichment team building events in the Lake District as part of the Duke of Edinburgh scheme.  Effective support arrangements. For example, three motor vehicle learners accessed a commentary on an on-line multi-choice assessment where the

p.2

Good practice observed

questions and possible answers where read out to the students via headphones. Learners engaged in revision or catch up activity can access the virtual learning environment anywhere and at any time.  Excellent promotion and reinforcement of health and safety procedures. These begin at induction and then in every lesson plan. Risk assessment sheets are clearly visible on equipment within the college workshops.  Excellent motor vehicle equipment. For example, laser alignment jigs, the latest water-based paint techniques and infrared drying equipment.  Links with local schools are strong. The college works with 15 secondary schools to deliver motor vehicle and manufacturing courses and helps teach several courses on school premises.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

 retention rates for adult learners at level 1 and some courses at level 2  the learning targets set at learners’ progress reviews are often too general to be useful  the additional learning needs support provided is not being recorded on individual learning plans.  a programme of secondments by staff to industry

p.3

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop engineering and manufacturing courses.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion