Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 14 Sept 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Name on report verified

    ANNUAL ASSESSMENT VISIT: MAIN FINDINGS

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+25Mostly positivemore positive than 37% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrongimprovedclearimprovingsuccessfulswiftly
Criticisminadequatepoorat risklow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings823w+37
  • What needs to improve308w−7

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,121
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 47, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
8
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 73%What needs to improve 27%

Full report text

Date of visit: 6 July 2007

This feedback contains brief findings from the annual assessment visit. It focuses on the themes explored during the visit and does not attempt to give a comprehensive overview of the college’s performance.

p.1

though its post-inspection action plan?

 A well focused post-inspection action plan outlines clear strategies for improving low retention rates on a number of courses. Most recent data shows that these strategies have impacted on retention rates during 2006/07. Action taken includes the appointment of two attendance officers to allow for closer monitoring of attendance patterns and to provide additional support for checking and intervention strategies. Quick indication of poor attendance has allowed course leaders to detect and intervene early. There has been closer monitoring of learners ‘at risk’ of not completing their course. A more systematic approach to monitoring has also been established through the faculty review process. Current retention data for 2006/07 demonstrates a pattern of improvement when compared with a similar period in 2005/06. For example retention has improved for 16-18 year olds from 2005/06 to 2006/07 at level 1 from

p.1

though its post-inspection action plan?

79% to 84%, at level 2 from 64% to 78% and at level 3 from 73% to 76%. For 19+ learners increases have ranged at level 1 from 73% to 78%, at level 2 from 73% to 83% and at level 3 from 72% to 80%. Overall retention on long courses is currently running at 80% which is an increase of 7% over the previous year and at the national average for similar colleges. Retention rates have increased by 8 percentage points on long courses for 16-18 year olds.

p.1

rates?

 During the current academic year a greater focus has been placed on teaching and learning, the monitoring and registering of learners to the appropriate key skills, better use of proxy qualifications and improved systems to ensure that end dates match the length of programme. In- year retention for 2006/07 on key skills courses show a significant improvement from 74% in 2005/06 to 84% in 2006/07. A new model for the organisation of key skills has been developed and will be implemented in 2007/08. This model will devolve the responsibility and quality assurance for key skills to the faculties and curriculum areas.

p.1

How is the college improving the quality of teaching and learning?

 The use of ‘learning champions’ has been promoted throughout the college. Support for individual teachers is now in place and there is a strong improvement focus on the large percentage of satisfactory teaching identified at the November 2006 inspection, in order to further raise standards. There has been an increased focus in sharing good practice, the use of standards unit materials, the development of ICT resources and close working with learning champions to promote teaching and learning skills. The use of learning champions has contributed significantly to improvements in construction and work-based learning programmes. Developing and supporting teaching and learning is a key strand in the college’s professional development programmes for staff.

p.2

retention and pass rates?

 The college introduced curriculum learning centres in September 2006. The centres provide a wide range of learning resources and support and are dedicated to the specialisms taught around their location. There is a strong emphasis on technology and ICT in the centres. Since their introduction curriculum learning centres have proved popular with learners, leading to a significant increase in usage over the year. Easy access to computers and a range of ICT learning materials have contributed to the popularity of the centres. The use of computers has doubled. The centres are also used to deliver information skills sessions and staff training. The centres are well staffed and are providing a catalyst for improvements in web-based resources and the development of innovative approaches to teaching and learning through technology.

p.2

retention and pass rates?

 The College’s programme of courses for 14-16 year olds has made a significant contribution to the local 14-19 strategy. Over 600 learners attended courses in 2006/07. These learners came from 16 secondary schools and two special schools and accessed a variety of courses. In 2005/06 the achievement rates for 14-16 learners on the school links programme was 76%; on the increased flexibility programme 91% and on the Young Apprenticeship programmes 100%. Of those accessing courses in Year 11 some 58% enrolled on courses at the college.

p.2

post-inspection action plan?

 The senior management team (SMT) has moved swiftly to address issues raised in the November 2006 inspection. The inspection team noted that capacity to improve was good and the progress made since the inspection reflect this grade. The SMT has led the post-inspection action plan with vigour. Quality assurance systems have been further tightened. Curriculum leaders and faculty heads have a greater involvement and responsibility in self-assessment. In construction and work-based learning well focused development plans have been implemented and the impact on the quality of provision is already apparent. A strong emphasis has also been placed on improving teaching and learning. The introduction of learning champions and learning centres has proved particularly successful. The principal, supported by the SMT, has advanced a self- critical and improvement culture throughout the college.

p.3

Has the quality of provision in construction improved?

 Following the grade of inadequate for construction at the November 2006 inspection a detailed and well-focused action plan was devised. A senior manager was given responsibility for the overall implementation of the plan. Significant progress has been made in addressing areas for improvement within construction. Two learning champions were assigned to the area and have worked very closely with staff to improve approaches to teaching and learning. Internal observations in 2006/07 indicate improvements within the area. More assessors were recruited to support the achievement of full frameworks for apprentices. Resources have been updated and aligned to the changed approach to teaching and learning. Retention on construction framework courses in 2005/06 was 49% compared to a current rate of 58% for 2006/07. Success rates for 2006/07 also demonstrate improvement with a current rate of 48% which is likely to convert to a year end figure of 60% plus. The manager

p.3

Has the quality of provision in construction improved?

responsible for construction in partnership with his staff is proactively addressing issues raised in the inspection report. Some impact of the changes instigated are already clear.

p.4

improved?

 A new model for work-based learning has been implemented. A new manager for work-based learning was appointed in September 2006. Eight new staff have been appointed as apprenticeship co-ordinators and reviewers. Links between employers and the college have improved significantly. The responsibility for work-based learning programmes has been assigned to faculty and curriculum areas and integrated into their quality assurance processes. The checking and monitoring of progress has improved. Work-based learners are better integrated into the tutorial programme and have greater access to other college services. The use of learning centres by work-based learners has doubled. Current data indicates significant improvement in work-based learning rates.

p.4

analysis:

the information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion