Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 6 Jul 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Name on report verified

    ANNUAL ASSESSMENT VISIT: MAIN FINDINGS

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+47Positivemore positive than 48% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseimprovedimprovingmake good progresshigh qualityconsistentlystrengthstimely
Criticismlowweaknessbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings620w+62
  • What needs to improve164w−7

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
761
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 45
Average sentence
14 words
Next steps
7
typical 5
Hedged sentences
6%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 79%What needs to improve 21%

Full report text

Date of visit: 20 June 2007

This feedback contains brief findings from the annual assessment visit. It focuses on the themes explored during the visit and does not attempt to give a comprehensive overview of the college’s performance.

p.1

report (SAR)

 The long course success rate overall, for learners aged 16 to 18, is high. The rate is improving but not as quickly as the national average rate. The level 3 rate, where most students study, is consistently high. At levels 1 and 2 the rate is low.  The long course success rate overall, for adults, is close to the national average. This rate is improving more quickly that the national average. The rates for courses at levels 2 and 3 are above average and close to the top quartile. At level 1 the rate is below average.  The progress made by learners studying GCE programmes is slightly better than that predicted by their attainment at entry to their advanced level programmes.  Key skills success rates have improved significantly and are now well above average. At level 3 the rate has improved but is low.  Apprenticeship framework success rates overall are improving markedly. The latest college data shows that they are at the average at level 2 but

p.1

report (SAR)

still low at level 3. Timely success rates are also improving but are still low.  The SAR provides a detailed analysis of learners’ achievements and standards. The SAR judgements broadly accords with the above analysis. They correctly identify, for example, the strengths at level 3, and the improvements required at levels 1 and 2 and in apprenticeship work.

p.1

The visit explored the work the college is doing to improve teaching

across the college.  The college is seeking to improve the quality of teaching by implementing several appropriate strategies. These include:  an extended professional development programme, “promoting active learning” which has been received well by teachers.  internal inspection, which includes the observation of teaching and learning, and is targeted at particular curriculum areas or at particular areas for improvement.  The work of a network of senior tutors and subject learning coaches who work within subject areas and with individual teachers. Areas targeted include keys skills achievements which have seen a marked improvement.  The college’s lesson observation profile indicates that most teaching is good or better and there is very little unsatisfactory teaching.

p.1

the last inspection. The visit tested the judgement in the SAR that

provision is now satisfactory.  The quality of key skills provision is rigorously evaluated in the SAR. Success rates have improved rapidly at levels 1 and 2 and are well above national averages. The SAR identifies correctly that the success rate at level 3 is a key weakness

p.2

The visit explored the work the college is doing with employers

 The college’s work with employers is substantial. For example its income from related activities is £5.5m. Train to Gain work is increasing and is already considerable. Currently some 55 assessors work in this area. Within construction, where the college is the Yorkshire and Humberside broker, 3000 learners have been referred. There is a substantial programme of distance learning work within health and social care. The college uses innovative methods to provide training, for example for large construction employers. Several foundation degrees are provided.

p.2

The visit explored the work the college is doing with employers

 The college is involved in four Centres of Vocational Excellence (rail, stone masonry, hospitality and tourism) either as lead or partner.  Several energetic steps have been taken to improve apprenticeship training. For example management arrangements are improved, individual reviews of progress are more comprehensive, key skills is taught early in the programme and additional support arrangements are targeted better. Innovative methods of collecting evidence using, for example, the virtual learning environment and digital technology have been introduced.

p.2

The visit explored developments in 14 to19 work

 The college has extensive provision for students aged 14 to 19 and offers a wide range of programmes and initiatives, including the increasing flexibility programme, young apprenticeships, and links with schools and pupil referral units. Pupils make good progress and where they sit formal qualifications pass rates are high. The college is collaborating with a several schools to produce specialist diplomas and has led a national pathfinder project.

p.3

courses on which achievements are high or low, and what is being

done to improve provision where required or share good practice.  College and course managers have a good understanding of the issues. Good practice is shared appropriately through mechanisms such as the professional development programme, the work of senior tutors and subject coaches and through internal inspection. The course managers of those courses identified as under-performing have a good understanding of the issues and are taking appropriate steps to improve the provision.

p.3

A tour of the new college was undertaken

 The completion of the new build is likely to meet the deadline and be within budget. It provides an imposing, spacious and high quality environment for learning.

p.3

analysis:

information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion