Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 14 Sept 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Name on report verified

    ANNUAL ASSESSMENT VISIT: MAIN FINDINGS

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+33Mostly positivemore positive than 41% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingimprovedrobusteffective
Criticismweakness

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings514w+25
  • What needs to improve142w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
647
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 78%What needs to improve 22%

Full report text

Date of visit: 9 July 2007

This feedback contains brief findings from the annual assessment visit. It focuses on the themes explored during the visit and does not attempt to give a comprehensive overview of the college’s performance.

p.1

Have success rates on long courses continued to improve?

 Overall success rates, for learners aged 16 to 18 and for adults, have improved steadily and in 2005/6 were both high. The level 3 success rate in 2005/6, for learners aged 16 to 18, was similar to that in 2004/5 and was close to the national average. At levels 1 and 2, for learners aged 16 to 18, and at all three levels for adult learners the success rates were high.

p.1

Have success rates on long courses continued to improve?

 The college no longer offers its own work based learning programmes but remains involved as a sub-contractor for a number of providers.

p.1

Have success rates on long courses continued to improve?

 The college continues to develop its data analysis and use of data to help continuous improvements. Currently managers are carrying out developmental work using in year retention and previous achievement rates in an attempt to produce a reliable forecast of success rates early in the year.

p.1

Is the college analysing data at appropriate levels of aggregation?

 Data is carefully analysed at appropriate levels of aggregation and the analyses are used to identify issues at sector subject area and course level.

p.1

is the evidence to support this judgement?

 An appropriate variety of evidence is used to support the judgement that teaching and learning are outstanding. This includes the consideration of learners views, the high success and retention rates, lesson observation and the evaluation undertaken in course reviews of the management of learning, for example the use of information and learning technology (ILT) and the way learners are supported.

p.2

is the evidence to support this judgement?

 Validation and moderation of the lesson observation process and the grades awarded are robust. Observers are shadowed by observers from different occupational areas to maintain consistency across the college and share good practice. External consultants are used to supplement the inspections of teaching and learning carried out within the college. Observations are carried out to a planned timetable giving the teachers to be observed opportunities to carefully plan and carry out their observed lesson and achieve a high grade. The observation system is the main method by which the college judges the quality of its teaching and learning.

p.2

by evidence?

 A more co-ordinated approach between the 5 centres has been organised. The college is also working more closely with partner schools. Shared events and the sharing of best practice are priorities. Enrichment development officers have been appointed to focus on ECM themes. Cross centre teaching and tutorial activities have taken place, focussing for example on managing money, understanding anti-bullying, enterprise education and wider key skills. Staff training on, for example, child protection issues has raised the profile of ECM themes.

p.2

is reviewed?

 At the previous inspection learner reviews were judged to be a weakness. Since then a number of actions have been implemented to improve their quality. An interim model was introduced to improve the reviews until a computer-based approach could be developed. This has entailed modified paperwork, staff training about target setting, and ensuring more effective communication and closer monitoring of learners’ progress. The college is currently developing an electronic ‘Progress Review Plan’ that will be accessible to all staff and learners, and provide useful information to parents and employers. This initiative is expected to be implemented from September 2007, with staff training scheduled for August 2007.

p.2

has this strategy impacted on the quality of provision?

 The intervention strategy has changed considerably. Previously any part of a curriculum area which was underperforming was taken out of the area and managed by a temporary team of managers until improvements were made. New managers at the college judged that this did not produce sustainable improvements and have replaced the intervention strategy with in house support for underperforming areas. Inspectors reviewed one area where support resulted improvements in retention and achievement. College staff in these areas were appreciative of the support provided.

p.3

analysis:

information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion