Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Name on report verified
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT VISIT: MAIN FINDINGS
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- On AS courses the value added ALPs grade improved from a grade 7 in 2002 to a grade 2 in 2006, which is classified as outstanding. p.1
- A key theme has been the sharing of good practice, with the production of a newsletter for spreading excellent practice in teaching and learning. p.3
- performance in this area and show positive outcomes, for example, improving attendance and retention and positive feedback from student surveys. p.3
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,045
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Fairly hard
- Flesch 54, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 19 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 7%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Date of visit: 9 May 2007
This feedback contains brief findings from the annual assessment visit. It focuses on the themes explored during the visit and does not attempt to give a comprehensive overview of the college’s performance.
p.1
Learners’ achievements 05/06
The overall success rate for long courses increased in 2005/06 to 79%. The majority of students are on level 3 courses and here success rates for AS courses increased by 8% and A level courses by 5%. The only area where success rates declined was on advanced vocational courses, where pass rates were very high but retention rates were low. Value added analysis shows that students make very good progress when compared to their qualifications on entry. On AS courses the value added ALPs grade improved from a grade 7 in 2002 to a grade 2 in 2006, which is classified as outstanding. On A level courses the value added ALPs grade improved from a 6 in 2005 to a 4 in 2006, which is classified as very good. Success rates on both level 1 and 2 courses increased in 2005/06. For GCSE courses success rates improved by 8% and on level 1 courses success rates recovered from a dip in 2004/05, increasing by more than
p.1
leaving the college?
Retention rates improved overall from 2004/05 to 2005/06. At level 3, where there are most students, retention increased for both AS and A level courses. However retention on advanced vocational courses dropped by 15%. Retention data to date for 2006/07 show the upward overall trend in retention has continued and strengthened. Monthly comparisons show retention currently 4% higher than this time last year. The introduction of learning mentors has been well received in the college. Initial indications are that learning mentors have had a positive impact on students’ experiences, their attendance and retention.
p.1
been made here?
At AS level those areas where there was underperformance in 2004/05 have improved. There are now no subjects where students achieve less than expected based on their attainment on entry. On A level courses there are still some areas where students achieve less well than expected, but some of these subjects have very small numbers and there are significant variations year on year. Where there are current issues within a subject or course, for example retention issues on AVCE courses, specific action plans are in place to bring about improvement.
p.2
being used to ensure the curriculum offer continues to meet needs?
There is currently a range of qualifications at levels 1, 2 and 3, with the majority of the offer at level 3. The college works hard at developing pathways so that students can progress from one level to the next and, potentially, from level 1 through to higher education. Within curriculum areas students are able to opt for different qualifications, for example BTEC or applied A level, so they can pick that which best meets their needs. The college analyses the curriculum offer thoroughly in two main ways; by looking externally to see what new initiatives are being developed and how they might benefit their students, and by analysing their existing offer to see where there are gaps or a need for development. In addition student feedback is used to judge their satisfaction with the courses on offer. At present the college is involved in a number of new developments including specialised diplomas and the
p.2
evaluating the impact of strategies on the learner experience?
There is a strong focus on support in the college and, in particular, on meeting the needs of the diverse student population. Learning mentors have had a key role in improving the support available for groups of students considered at risk. The every child matters (ECM) agenda has been embedded throughout the college with curriculum audits and each site having a designated child protection/ECM officer. There are extensive links with local feeder schools to support a smooth transition into the college, with appropriate support structures put in place for those that need them. Great emphasis is placed on ensuring students are placed on the courses that best suit their needs. The consistency of tutorial delivery has been improved and there is a focus on the sharing of good practice. There are regular audits of provision and a culture of rigorous self- assessment is being developed. A range of indicators are used to judge
p.3
evaluating the impact of strategies on the learner experience?
performance in this area and show positive outcomes, for example, improving attendance and retention and positive feedback from student surveys.
p.3
maintaining them?
All departments produce action plans to deal with specific issues in their areas and these are regularly monitored and reviewed, both within departments and in meetings with college managers. In addition there are college wide strategies, such as the use of learning mentors and the focus on skills for life, which have been of benefit to departments in improving provision. A key theme has been the sharing of good practice, with the production of a newsletter for spreading excellent practice in teaching and learning. In addition there is support for staff where individual issues have been identified. There is an increasing use of information and learning technology and other strategies to increase student participation and enjoyment of sessions.
p.3
challenges and how is their effectiveness monitored?
To ensure smooth working across the two sites the timetable is well structured to allow time for movement between sites for both staff and students. There are effective communication systems, with electronic communication being very helpful. Departments work well together and meet regularly to make sure staff from different sites do not feel isolated. Senior managers split their time across the sites and monitor provision regularly to make sure they pick up on any issues. Some minor issues have been picked up, for example from student surveys, and these have been dealt with effectively. There is a strong focus on consistency across the two sites. At present the transition to the new site is having limited impact on staff and students, with most effect being on the senior management team. On the existing South Campus provision has been moved to a different building, temporarily before the move to the new campus in August 2008,
p.4
challenges and how is their effectiveness monitored?
but this has been well managed and so has had very little negative impact.
p.4
analysis:
Plans to move to the new South Campus are progressing well. Plans to move to the town-centre site are at an earlier stage of development.
p.4
analysis:
information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion