Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Name on report verified
MONITORING VISIT: MAIN FINDINGS
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No next steps set out.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Communication & language2
“There are still too many examples of confusing, and sometimes incorrect, language.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 1,234
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 46, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 0
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 10%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Context
Martec Training (Martec) was established in 1982 to train apprentices in the motor vehicle industry specifically for the Marson group of motor vehicle franchises. The company grew and developed to extend training to other local companies in the motor vehicle industry. Martec provides work-based learning for young people and is funded by Staffordshire Learning and Skills Council (LSC). As well as apprenticeships and advanced apprenticeships in engineering, Martec has a small number of learners in retail and customer services and a specialist entry to employment (E2E) programme. Martec is based in Newcastle-Under-Lyme and is run by 2 directors who are supported by a general manager and 22 staff.
p.1
Context
At the previous inspection all aspects of Martec’s provision were judged to be satisfactory. The key challenges were judged to be:
p.1
Context
Improve achievement rates for apprenticeships and maintain and improve achievement rates for National Vocational Qualifications (NVQs) Introduce systems to better co-ordinate on- and off-the job training and increase employers’ engagement in the training programme Further develop systems for recording learners’ achievement Continue to develop procedures to ensure the quality of the provision Improve the training centre’s operation and resources Maintain and develop the open style of management
p.1
Progress
Martec have made reasonable progress in improving success rates. Most recent data shows a good improvement in framework success rates. Overall success rates for all apprentices have improved, and are now only 5% below the national average of 58%. Advanced apprenticeship rates are now significantly higher than national averages, but those for apprentices, although improved, remain 10% below the national average of 60%. Since the previous inspection Martec has introduced rigorous initial assessment and a new induction programme. Learners are matched to appropriate training programmes. Retention has improved significantly, with over 90% of the current cohort still in training. The company now closely monitors progress towards completion of the framework on a monthly basis, and the findings are shared with learners and assessors. Learners at risk of not completing within their funded time are clearly identified, and measures are put in place to help them
p.1
Progress
finish the framework. However, the company is aware that it does not yet identify clear and specific targets to ensure that learners understand exactly how to achieve their qualifications. Positive outcomes on the E2E programme remain at around 50%.
p.2
Progress
The company has increased its co-ordination of on- and off- the job training and made reasonable progress. It now gives employers information about the awarding body’s knowledge and skill requirements for framework completion. In addition to this Martec provide employers with a termly schedule of learning activities to help them to plan jobs which will give learners opportunities to practice skills and have them assessed. Assessors share information about learners’ progress and learning needs with employers at regular quarterly reviews. Staff at Martec telephone employers before learners are due to attend lessons, to help overcome attendance problems. Martec has introduced strategies to support learners with activities which employers cannot provide. For example, they send learners on courses from specialist providers to cover areas which need manufacturer specific equipment, provided workshops in topics which they have identified as being hard for some
p.2
Progress
employers to provide, and have invested in occupational up-dating for staff.
p.2
Progress
Martec have made reasonable progress in dealing with this area for improvement. The manager of the E2E programme has been in post for six months. Staff now monitor learners’ progress using the same electronic monitoring system used for apprentices. This gives staff a clear record of the progress learners are making on each aspect of their programme including attendance, jobsearch, ASDAN and skills for life. It identifies clearly those at risk of not completing the programme within the funded time, as well as attendance rates and patterns. The process is very recent and it is not yet possible to fully judge its impact. The monitoring sheet is regularly updated and accessible to staff and learners. It is complemented by a paper based monitoring system which shows individual learner targets. This is updated monthly. Martec now have a clear overall picture of learners’ progress.
p.2
Progress
Since the previous inspection Martec have made some improvements to E2E learning materials but progress has been insufficient. Martec have very recently started a thorough review of all learning materials as part of the introduction of their new E2E programme. They previously had modified many of the existing materials to use colour and graphics. However, the graphics have just been added to the documents rather than properly integrated. Many of the documents are still poorly copied. There are still too many examples of confusing, and sometimes incorrect, language. For example “multi” is referred to as the one thousandth prefix in a worksheet about formulae. Some worksheets are poorly laid out with insufficient guidance for the learner. Under the guidance of the new E2E manager a portfolio of learning materials is being developed. The new materials are much clearer and use graphics well to illustrate various points. However, the quality of the copying is still poor in some
p.3
Progress
cases and some of the language is still too complex. Martec have identified this point and recently bought a new printer and intend to print multiple copies rather than use the poorer quality photocopier.
p.3
Progress
Martec has made significant progress on this theme. A wide range of improvements have been made to the training centre. Safe walkways have been created with use of floor markings. Specific large tool storage spaces have been created and are used consistently. Vehicles that are being worked on will not be used again on the public highway. All machines and equipment have appropriate guards fitted. There is no fume extraction but arrangements for ensuring that running engines pose no hazard are satisfactory. Particularly good attention has been paid to cleanliness. The centre is kept clear of debris, although a very few workbenches are still untidy. Martec have created cleaning stations where cleaning implements are readily and visibly stored. Additional screening has been provided to ensure that practices such as welding do not constitute a hazard to other personnel. The induction of learners has a strong
p.3
Progress
focus on health and safety and Martec carry out regular and detailed checks of learners’ workplaces.
p.3
progress
Since the previous inspection Martec has made reasonable progress on developing quality assurance procedures. They have established a member of staff with specific responsibility for quality assurance, who completed a thorough review of all procedures in April 2007. The new policy is clear, well-laid out and effectively links all aspects of quality assurance. Good use is made of flowcharts and the focus on the impact on learners is much stronger. Greater use is made of target-setting and monitoring of targets. Martec has made better use of the links with the Staffordshire Training Providers’ Association. Martec has recently bought into the scheme for learners’ surveys, carried out by a subcontractor, although they have only just received the results from the survey of apprentices and not yet had a survey of E2E learners. Observations of teaching and learning continue and Martec has arranged for the local FE college to carry out some observations. However, there is as yet no
p.3
progress
analysis of the results of these observations to look at overall trends and profiles. The follow up of issues found at audit is more robust.
p.4
progress
information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion