Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 13 Apr 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Russell Jordan

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Russell Jordan

  • Postcode verified

    TR1 3XX

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+96Very positivemore positive than 99% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisevery effectivevery wellextremelyeffectiveexcellenthigh qualitystronghighly effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings736w+96
  • What needs to improve92w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
809
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 48
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 2
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 89%What needs to improve 11%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr Jonathan Burnett OBE Principal Truro College College Road Truro Cornwall TR1 3XX

p.1

Sector Subject Area 15: Business, Administration and Law

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation during our visit on 26 and 27 February 2007. We are particularly grateful to your staff for all their hard work in preparing the programme and background documentation and giving up a great deal of their time during the visit. Please pass on our thanks to those learners who gave up their time to talk to us.

p.1

Sector Subject Area 15: Business, Administration and Law

The visit provided much useful evidence for the good practice survey in business and administration. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but should we wish to cite specific aspects of practice we will contact the college first.

p.1

Sector Subject Area 15: Business, Administration and Law

The evidence used to inform judgements included: interviews with staff and learners, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of learners’ work and observation of seven lessons.

p.1

Sector Subject Area 15: Business, Administration and Law

I agreed to provide a summary of my observations of good practice seen in business and to suggest some areas for development.

p.1

Good practice observed

 Success rates in business courses for learners aged 16-18 are well above the national average for similar colleges.  Success rates and high grade achievement are mostly well above the national average in general certificate of education (GCE) AS and A level business courses for learners aged 16-18.  Target setting and individual review for learners are extremely effective; learners make at least the progress they should from their starting points on entry in AS and A level qualifications. In accounting at both AS and A level in 2005/06 students made excellent progress.  The application of the recognition and recording of progress and achievement (RARPA) for adult learners in non-accredited training is rigorous.  Success rates on private secretaries’ courses are very high.  Systems to monitor and follow up on non-attendance are very effective and have contributed to improved retention rates.  Lessons are generally of a high quality. They are well planned with

p.1

Good practice observed

clear objectives that are understood by learners. Teachers use questioning techniques very well in lessons to test and develop students’ knowledge and understanding. Teachers use a range of interesting activities to meet the individual needs of learners. Activities draw from realistic business contexts including students’ work placements.  Teachers have expert subject knowledge. Staff development is effective in supporting the sharing of good practice in teaching and learning. The use of learners’ feedback in the evaluation and continuous improvement of lessons is rigorous.  Teachers have very good rapport with learners and provide positive and supportive feedback on performance in lessons. Learners state that teachers go out of their way to support learners’ needs and they want them to succeed.  Teachers’ marking is very thorough. Feedback on learners’ work is of consistently high quality; this leaves learners in no doubt about how

p.2

Good practice observed

well they have done against the criteria and where improvement is needed.  The requirements of the communication key skill are well embedded in AS and A-level economics.  Learners use information and communication technology (ICT) confidently and well to develop and support research and independent learning skills. These skills equip them very well for their current studies and progression into higher education (HE) and future employment.  Learners’ progression into HE and business-related degrees is strong.  There is a broad-based range of courses with clear progression routes. Learners may choose from a very extensive range of subject combinations at AS and A level.  There is an impressive range of courses on offer to learners in employment through the Business Centre, and the centre of vocational excellence (CoVE) in care. The college is very effective at engaging local employers and in identifying and meeting their training needs. It

p.2

Good practice observed

is extremely responsive to the needs of local businesses and provides flexible and creatively designed training packages. Partnership working is very effective. Assessment is very flexible to learners’ needs, including good use of ICT and professional discussion.  Teachers and managers embrace a culture of continuous improvement. The monitoring of college performance is highly effective in identifying areas for improvement. The resulting actions are equally effective, as is clear from the successful focus on raising framework achievement in work-based learning. Teachers and managers genuinely place learners at the centre of the college’s activities. Communication between teaching staff in support of learners is very strong.

p.2

Areas for development:

 maintain the overall improving trend in retention and success rates in long business courses for adults  maintain the overall improving trend in framework achievement for apprenticeships.

p.3

Areas for development:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop business courses in the college.

p.3

Areas for development:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your LLSC and will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of the half-term following the inspection. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion