Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 17 May 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Gillian Salter-Smith

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Gillian Salter-Smith

  • Postcode verified

    BD18 1AA

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−16Mixedmore positive than 17% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseconfidentenjoysafemake good progressimprovingwell supportedclear
Criticismnot yetweakweakerlownot alwaysnot secure

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings933w+37
  • Leadership399w−83
  • What needs to improve144w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,441
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
8%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 63%Leadership 27%What needs to improve 10%

Full report text

Mrs Thornton Headteacher Low Ash Primary School Wrose Lane Wrose Shipley West Yorkshire BD18 1AA

p.1

Club links (PESSCL) strategy on improving the standards of

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff and those of the Hanson/Bradford North School Sport Partnership and Bradford City Swimming Development Unit (BCSDU), during my visits on Tuesday 27 February and Friday 02 March to look at work in swimming.

p.1

Club links (PESSCL) strategy on improving the standards of

As outlined in my initial letter, the visit had a particular focus on the impact of the PESSCL strategy in improving the standards and quality of provision in swimming.

p.1

Club links (PESSCL) strategy on improving the standards of

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Club links (PESSCL) strategy on improving the standards of

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with key staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation and observation of a swimming lesson.

p.1

Club links (PESSCL) strategy on improving the standards of

The overall effectiveness of swimming provision was judged to be satisfactory. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 0207 4216855 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement and standards are satisfactory

p.2

Achievement and standards

 At the start of the current programme of 18 lessons, around one quarter of Year 5 pupils are confident swimmers in deep water, a similar proportion are non-swimmers. Around half are improving swimmers who are working towards National Curriculum expectations.  Most pupils make the progress expected of them. In three of the past four years around 85% or more of pupils have achieved National Curriculum standards. One third of these pupils achieve good personal survival skills.  Each year, a small number of pupils, around five or six, who have had little prior experience of swimming do not reach National Curriculum standards. They achieve basic water confidence but the course of 18 lessons is not sufficient for them to progress further.  In 2004/5 the proportion of Year 5 pupils who did not reach National Curriculum standards was much higher at 28%. This was because many of these pupils had learning difficulties and/or disabilities and

p.2

Achievement and standards

faced barriers to learning in swimming. These pupils were not able to benefit from the PESSCL ‘Top Up’ funding in summer 2006 because the funding was not received in time to implement plans.  Pupils understand how to keep themselves safe during swimming lessons. However, their recall of how to keep safe when near water outdoors is less secure with some pupils struggling to remember what they have been taught some time ago.  With the support of staff from the school, around 16 pupils have achieved well in local galas and attend a local swimming club in their own time.  A small number of gifted and talented pupils attend a local swimming club and are doing well, one representing the city in national competitions.  Pupils enjoy swimming lessons. They enjoy the variety of activities and feel they are challenged. Levels of participation are good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

The quality of teaching and learning is satisfactory.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 Swimming is taught by well qualified swimming teachers employed by BCSDU. They are supported by experienced class teachers and teaching assistants.  Low Ash Primary School pupils benefit from the allocation of an extra swimming teacher provided through PESSCL ‘Top Up’ funding so that teaching groups are of a reasonable size.  Physical skills are taught well so that pupils make good progress in developing water confidence, strokes and personal survival skills. Pupils of all abilities are suitable challenged.  Behaviour and discipline are good.  There is little planning to develop pupils’ skills, knowledge and understanding across all strands of the National Curriculum or to use opportunities in swimming to develop key skills such as speaking and listening.  Assessment is used satisfactorily to organise teaching groups of similar ability. BCSDU staff keep on-going records of individual pupils’ achievements but these are only passed on to the school at the end of

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

the programme of lessons. A clear record of each pupil’s starting point in swimming is not kept.  Class teachers and teaching assistants who attend swimming lessons are, at least, ‘extra eyes’ and are trained in this role by BCSDU staff. They are not all trained for or required to support learning in swimming.

p.3

Quality of curriculum

The quality of the curriculum is satisfactory and supports pupils’ progress.

p.3

Quality of curriculum

 A programme of 18 lessons of 30 minutes per week enables most Year 5 pupils to achieve National Curriculum standards. However, this is not sufficient time for those pupils with little prior experience of swimming or those facing significant barriers to learning to reach National Curriculum standards.  The school has benefited from additional swimming provision provided by BCSDU during this year and all Year 4 pupils have had a minimum of 10 lessons. They have made progress and been awarded school awards for their achievements. A small number of Year 6 pupils who did not reach National Curriculum standards during Year 5 also benefited from these sessions but have not yet met National Curriculum standards.  The school encourages pupils to take part in swimming out of school hours.

p.3

Leadership and management

The leadership and management of swimming in the school are satisfactory.

p.3

Leadership and management

 The leadership of the school and the subject leader, supported by staff in the school, are committed to supporting pupils in reaching National Curriculum expectations in swimming and to encouraging achievement of the more able swimmers.  The school has made the most of opportunities for additional provision offered by BCSDU to provide additional experience for Year 4 pupils and a small number of current Year 6 pupils who did not achieve National Curriculum expectations.  The school has a reasonable understanding of standards and the quality of provision in swimming though there is little formal monitoring by leaders. An evaluation of the provision for Year 4 pupils showed the school to be satisfied with this provision.

p.3

Subject issue - the impact of the PESSCL ‘Top-Up’ programme

The impact of the PESSCL ‘Top-Up’ programme is satisfactory for this school.

p.4

Subject issue - the impact of the PESSCL ‘Top-Up’ programme

 Year 5 pupils just starting their 18 week programme of swimming lessons are benefiting from the allocation of an extra swimming teacher provided by ‘Top-Up’ funding. The additional swimming teacher enables weak swimmers to work in a small group of 12 pupils with one swimming teacher and a class teacher.  Year 4 pupils and a small number of Year 6 pupils who did not meet National Curriculum standards last year, also benefited from this arrangement during swimming lessons held in the first half of the school year.  ‘Top-Up’ funding was not made available to the Partnership/BSCDU until autumn 2006 so that the 28% of Year 6 pupils from Low Ash School who had not reached National Curriculum standards and left the school in summer 2006 did not benefit from it.  The policy of targeting funding towards weaker schools rather than to individual pupils within all schools has meant that ‘Top-Up’ funding has not been closely targeted towards all pupils for whom it was intended.

p.4

Subject issue - the impact of the PESSCL ‘Top-Up’ programme

Weak swimmers in some higher achieving schools have not yet benefited from ‘Top-Up’ arrangements.  Plans are in hand for BCSDU to offer ‘Top-Up’ swimming opportunities to all pupils across the city, including pupils in Low Ash School, during two weeks of the summer term 2007. These sessions will be partly supported by ‘Top-Up’ funding.  The impact of the PESSCL ‘Top-Up’ arrangements on standards and provision in swimming has not yet been evaluated by BCSDU or the partnership because swimming programmes in all schools have not yet been completed.

p.4

Inclusion

 The school takes good care to ensure that pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities have good opportunities to learn to swim. They liaise with families and support agencies to overcome barriers to learning.  Pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities are well supported during swimming lessons by the school’s teaching assistants.  The arrangements made to use ‘Top-Up’ funding have not always been targeted closely enough towards all pupils in need of support.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 ensure that all pupils, especially weaker swimmers, have sufficient time programmed for swimming lessons to enable them to meet National Curriculum standards  ensure that arrangements for ‘Top-Up’ swimming are targeted to pupils not achieving NC standards in all schools  remind pupils of how to keep themselves safe near water outdoors more frequently  ensure that teachers and teaching assistants have sufficient training to enable them to be confident in supporting learning in swimming  carry out more formal monitoring of provision and its impact on pupils’ progress.

p.5

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop swimming in the school.

p.5

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion