Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 11 Jul 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

David Hornbrook

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    David Hornbrook

  • Postcode verified

    E5 9NL

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

−56Criticalmore positive than 6% of reports of this type

Reads more critically than most reports of this type.

Praisepositivesuccessfullysuccessfulstrengthsclear
Criticismnot yetweaknessestoo slownot sufficientlyfalling behindbelowtoo manynot rigorous

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspection positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
490
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 46, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
1
typical 5
Hedged sentences
9%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%About the inspection 32%

Full report text

Mr Gary Boyd The Headteacher Southwold Primary School Detmold Road London E5 9NL

p.1

Ofsted Monitoring of Schools with Notice to Improve

Thank you for the help which you and your staff gave when Usha Sahni HMI and I inspected your school on 26 June, for the time you gave to our phone discussion and for the information which you provided before and during our visit. I would also like to thank the pupils we met, formally and informally, who were most courteous and helpful.

p.1

Ofsted Monitoring of Schools with Notice to Improve

This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website. Please inform the Regional Inspection Service Provider of any factual inaccuracies within 24 hours of its receipt.

p.1

Ofsted Monitoring of Schools with Notice to Improve

As a result of the inspection on December 2006, the school was asked to:

p.1

Ofsted Monitoring of Schools with Notice to Improve

 Improve standards and achievement in English, mathematics and science.  Improve the overall quality of teaching and learning in Years 3 to 6 to ensure the needs of all pupils are fully met.  Enable teachers to achieve consistency in how they assess and record pupils' attainments, in order to inform their planning and to help in the tracking of pupils' progress.

p.1

Ofsted Monitoring of Schools with Notice to Improve

The inspection report also judged the curriculum not to be effective in catering for the needs of all learners as it does not offer enough opportunities for more able pupils to excel.

p.1

Ofsted Monitoring of Schools with Notice to Improve

Having considered all the evidence I am of the opinion that at this time the school is making satisfactory progress in addressing the issues for improvement and in raising the pupils’ achievements.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Although attainment remains well below the national average, there are signs of improvement. Higher staff stability and morale, together with the success of Prospects Learning Services Ltd 132-138 High Street Bromley Kent BR1 1EZ T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk Direct T 020 8313 7760 Direct F 020 8464 3393 measures to improve behaviour, have had a positive impact on learning. After some uncertainty about the accuracy of the data, it is now clear that pupils enter and leave the Foundation Stage with below average levels of attainment. Thereafter, results of recent teacher assessments show pupils making better progress in English, mathematics and science in Years 5 and 6 than at the time of the last inspection. The standard of pupils’ written work is still low, however, and too many do not take enough care over presentation.

p.1

Teaching and learning in Years 3 to 6

While there have also been some improvements in the quality of teaching, too much is still only satisfactory. Teachers are not yet planning or organising lessons so that pupils of all levels of attainment are appropriately challenged. If underachievement at Southwold is to be tackled successfully, the quality of teaching overall needs to be at least good. At present, the rate of advance in this key area is too slow and the monitoring and management of the performance of teachers is not sufficiently rigorous. Judgements made about teaching are not focused enough on the impact teachers are having on pupils’ progress.

p.2

Assessment

Systems for tracking and monitoring pupils’ progress are much better. Teachers now have a much surer grasp of how well pupils are doing against national benchmarks and this has facilitated a number of successful interventions to stop identified pupils from falling behind. However, assessment information is not yet being used enough to inform teachers’ planning. Marking is regular, but not of consistent quality either in its accuracy or helpfulness.

p.2

Curriculum

The curriculum is being extensively revised for the autumn. While present arrangements are satisfactory, they still do not provide adequately for higher- attaining pupils. Nevertheless, the school offers a number of additional options, such as the Saturday school, and there are booster classes for those pupils who need them.

p.2

Curriculum

The headteacher and his senior team know the school’s strengths and weaknesses. Over the past 12 months they have succeeded in stabilising the school and put in place a number of measures which are slowly beginning to turn it round. The Learning Trust has fulfilled the obligations for support laid out in the statement of action, although the school would have preferred more specialised support more broadly spread across year groups. The school and the Trust need now to focus much more sharply on key issues raised in the last Ofsted report in order for progress to be made with the degree of urgency required. I hope that you have found the visit helpful in promoting improvement in your school.

p.2

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion