Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)

Pennine Way Primary School

Inspected 11 Oct 2007 · published 22 Apr 2008 · URN 131177

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

Inadequate

Linda Buller

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspection date verified

    11 Oct 2007

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Linda Buller

  • Achievement verified

    Inadequate

  • Care guidance support verified

    Satisfactory

  • Curriculum verified

    Satisfactory

  • Leadership and management verified

    Satisfactory

  • Overall effectiveness verified

    Inadequate

  • Personal development verified

    Satisfactory

  • Teaching and learning verified

    Inadequate

  • Postcode verified

    CA1 3RQ

  • Name on report verified

    Pennine Way Primary School

  • URN verified

    131177

Page 1 of 11
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Grade profile

Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.

  • OverallInadequate
  • AchievementInadequate
  • Care guidance supportSatisfactory
  • CurriculumSatisfactory
  • Leadership and managementSatisfactory
  • Personal developmentSatisfactory
  • Teaching and learningInadequate

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+13Mostly positivemore positive than 72% of reports of this type graded Inadequate
OutstandingGoodSatisfactoryInadequate

In line with other reports of this type graded Inadequate.

Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.

Praiseexceptionallyenjoyeffectiveeffectivelyoutstandingmake good progressrigoroussupportive
Criticisminadequateweaknessesbelowlowweaknot yetat riskweakness

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1592w+42
  • What needs to improve1204w−24

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
11
Words of findings
2,768
about usual (typical 3071)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 45, typical 44
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
8
typical 8
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 57%What needs to improve 43%About the inspection 0%

Full report text

Pennine Way Primary School Inspection report

p.1

131177 Unique Reference Number Cumbria Local Authority 301729 Inspection number 10 °11 October 2007 Inspection dates Linda Buller Reporting inspector

p.1

This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.

p.1

Primary Type of school Community School category 3 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 289 School The governing body Appropriate authority Mr Jeff Johnston Chair Mrs Sue Blair Headteacher 1 July 2003 Date of previous school inspection Silverdale Road School address Harraby Carlisle Cumbria CA1 3RQ 01228 607518 Telephone number 01228 607519 Fax number

p.1

3-11 Age group 10 °11 October 2007 Inspection dates 301729 Inspection number .

p.1

This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.

p.2

Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.

p.2

Introduction

The inspection was carried out by three Additional Inspectors.

p.3

Description of the school

This large school serves a community where there are above average levels of social disadvantage. The proportion of pupils entitled to a free school meal is above the national average, as is that of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities. Most pupils are White British. The headteacher has been in post since April 2005. In October 2005 the school experienced severe flooding with part of the school closed for five months. The school has been in receipt of extensive support from the local authority.

p.3

Key for inspection grades

Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 11 Inspection Report: Pennine Way Primary School, 10 °11 October 2007

p.3

Grade: 4

In accordance with section 13 (3) of the Education Act 2005, Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector is of the opinion that this school requires significant improvement because it is performing significantly less well than in all the circumstances it could reasonably be expected to perform. The school is therefore given a Notice to Improve. Significant improvement is required in relation to the achievement and standards reached by pupils. Over a considerable period of time, pupils leaving Pennine Way at the end of Year 6 have not been achieving as well as they could and standards have been well below the national average. With intensive support from the local authority, this is now improving. The headteacher has introduced several key changes to tackle the identified weaknesses. This includes the implementation of effective systems for self-evaluation and the rigorous tracking of pupils’ progress. Much improvement has been made in the Foundation Stage, where teaching is good

p.4

Grade: 4

and children make good progress. In Key Stage 2 pupils are now making at least satisfactory progress in most areas of their learning. Nevertheless, despite these recent improvements, standards remain low at both key stages, with the legacy of underachievement continuing for pupils in Key Stage 1 and in writing throughout the school. The quality of teaching and learning is inadequate. There are examples of good teaching in upper Key Stage 2 and of lessons of a satisfactory quality elsewhere. Although expectations about pupils’ behaviour in lessons are high, those for their academic performance are often low. This results in a lack of challenge that continues to adversely affect pupils’ progress. This is particularly the case in Years 1 and 2 and in writing. Good teamwork between teachers and teaching assistants often results in good support for those pupils who have difficulty with their learning and this contributes to the satisfactory progress which these pupils make.

p.4

Grade: 4

The curriculum satisfactorily meets pupils’ needs. The focus on promoting personal development has met with a great deal of success. Behaviour is good. Pupils say they have no fear of bullying and that they really enjoy the range of activities in lessons and after school. They have a good understanding of how to keep themselves safe and how to live a healthy lifestyle. Pupils are very supportive of one another and keen to do all they can to contribute to their school community. Attendance remains below average but is, overall, within the broadly average range. However despite recent overall improvement in attendance, unauthorised absence remains too high at four times the national figure. Pupils are not sufficiently encouraged to practise their basic skills across many areas of their learning and this hinders the preparation for their future economic well-being. Pupils’ personal development is satisfactory overall.

p.4

Grade: 4

Provision for the care, guidance and support of pupils is satisfactory. The school provides a good level of care, and effective links with outside agencies contribute successfully to pupils’ well-being. Relationships between staff and pupils are good, although the teachers’ knowledge of pupils’ academic standards is not used well enough to challenge pupils to improve further. Leadership and management are satisfactory. Parents and staff have well placed confidence in the strong leadership and clear sense of direction provided by the headteacher, and pupil numbers are rising. Weaknesses are understood and measures are being taken to eradicate them. Although standards have fallen since the last inspection, the school is determined to improve and has demonstrated a satisfactory capacity to do so. 4 of 11 Inspection Report: Pennine Way Primary School, 10 °11 October 2007

p.4

Grade: 2

Provision in the Foundation Stage is good and is a strength of the school. The good start that children make in the Foundation Unit gives them a very firm basis for their future education. Children are provided with a variety of stimulating and purposeful activities which help them to make good progress from their low starting points on entry to the Nursery. Good teaching ensures activities are linked together skilfully, with the right mixture of adult-led and child-chosen experiences. Children’s individual needs are carefully catered for and, as a result, they achieve well. The Foundation Unit is led well: good assessment procedures are in place and staff work together effectively as a team.

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

■ Increase the rate of pupils’ progress.

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

■ Raise standards, particularly in Key Stage 1 and in writing across the school.

p.5

What the school should do to improve further

■ Improve teaching and learning, and particularly the level of challenge in lessons.

p.5

Grade: 4

Achievement is inadequate and standards are low when set against the national average. Children’s attainment on entry to the Foundation Stage is low compared with that which is typical for their age, particularly in their communication skills. They make good, and at times outstanding, progress so that by the time they enter Year 1 most have reached or exceeded the goals set for their learning. In Key Stage 1, pupils do not make the progress which they should, particularly in writing. In the 2006 assessments for seven °year-olds in reading, writing and mathematics, the school’s results were markedly below national averages. School information shows that, despite some improvement, the results of the 2007 assessments are below those expected of pupils at the end of Year 2. In 2006, following several years of decline, the results in national tests at the end of Key Stage 2 improved. Despite this improvement, the results remained exceptionally low when compared

p.5

Grade: 4

to the national average and pupils continued to underachieve. Early indications are that this improvement continued in 2007, with pupils making good progress in Year 6 in reading and mathematics to reach broadly average standards, although progress in writing remained slow. The school met its targets set for 2006 and 2007. Most pupils currently in Key Stage 2 are making satisfactory progress but this is not always rapid enough to make up the ground previously lost.

p.5

Grade: 3

Personal development, including pupils’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural development, is satisfactory. Assemblies make a good contribution to pupils’ understanding of themselves and the needs of others. Behaviour is good in lessons and around the school. Pupils say they feel safe and secure and that teachers will quickly resolve any issues. Friendly welcomes and cheerful smiles are characteristic of the school. Pupils enjoy lessons and talk eagerly about the interesting 5 of 11 Inspection Report: Pennine Way Primary School, 10 °11 October 2007 activities they are expected to complete. Attendance, despite a recent marginal improvement to within the broadly average range, remains below average. The school is taking steps to dissuade parents from taking holidays during term time but unauthorised absence is still too high. Pupils readily discuss the school council’s contribution to the life and work of the school.

p.5

Grade: 3

They are keen to take responsibility, for example, when helping to serve at the healthy salad bar during lunchtime. A good understanding is shown of the importance of a healthy lifestyle through vigorous activity and through the Year 6 analysis of the packed lunches some pupils bring to school. While pupils are preparing well for the next stage of their education in their personal and social skills, a legacy of weak academic skills detracts from their prospects for future economic well-being.

p.6

Grade: 4

Teaching is inadequate overall. Although there are pockets of good teaching towards the end of Key Stage 2, teaching in Key Stage 1 does not foster the quality of learning of which pupils are capable. Elsewhere, in the best lessons the pace is brisk and demanding but these lessons are not frequent enough. Throughout the school good relationships are maintained between adults and pupils; this is a consistent strength. This ensures good behaviour, willingness and readiness among pupils to learn. Teachers plan interesting activities which pupils say they enjoy and at times these are challenging. However, some short-term planning does not take sufficient account of pupils’ prior attainment and too often expectations are not high enough. This is particularly the case in writing and is one of the reasons why standards are not high enough. The marking of work is generally informative and pupils’ self-evaluations are helpful, but the

p.6

Grade: 4

use of day-to-day assessment has yet to make its full impact on improving the speed at which pupils learn.

p.6

Grade: 3

The curriculum is satisfactory. It is broad and balanced and recent changes aimed at providing for the different needs and aspirations of pupils are having some success. For example, one afternoon per week is devoted to ‘smart clubs’ whereby the whole school is mixed and classes are run based on pupils’ interests. This has motivated pupils, raised their self-esteem and provided well for the development of their social skills. Many other initiatives are still developmental. For example, plans to build on the success of the Foundation Stage by introducing a thematic approach to learning throughout the school and the use of different subjects as a vehicle to inspire pupils’ writing are not yet fully implemented. There is a wide range of extra-curricular activities, including basketball, gymnastics and a choir. These are popular and contribute to pupils’ enjoyment of school. Pupils have opportunities to participate

p.6

Grade: 3

in outside visits, including a residential stay. The school makes good use of external speakers, for example the police and fire services, to provide for pupils’ safety and well-being.

p.6

Grade: 3

The care, guidance and support provided for pupils are satisfactory. Personal and social care are good. Parents show respect and appreciation of the care shown to their children. Training 6 of 11 Inspection Report: Pennine Way Primary School, 10 °11 October 2007 for child protection has recently been updated and disseminated to all staff. Risk assessments are regular and effective. The school has a good partnership with parents, the educational welfare officer and other agencies to support pupils’ needs. Learners at risk, including those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities, are quickly identified and their needs met. Although the school now has good information about the progress pupils make, this information is not yet used consistently well enough to guide pupils towards higher standards.

p.6

Grade: 3

Leadership and management are satisfactory and improving. The headteacher’s clear and determined leadership is sharply focused on raising standards. The changes introduced are correctly targeted on areas of weakness identified through effective data analysis and rigorous tracking of pupils’ progress. The weaknesses are now being addressed systematically. For example, the rate of exclusions has been greatly reduced and the Year 6 pupils in 2007 received considerable support to bring about significant improvements to their attainment in mathematics and science. However, the pace of improvement has not been fast enough to address fully the legacy of underachievement. Although a higher proportion of pupils are now making the progress that they should, much remains to be done. For example, although the headteacher is increasingly well supported by governors and the senior team, the leadership and management

p.7

Grade: 3

of Key Stage 1 have not been effective enough to tackle the underachievement there. Governors are supportive of the school and have worked hard to eliminate a deficit budget. They are aware that weaknesses remain in pupils’ achievement and standards but their view of the rate of improvement is over- optimistic. The school does not provide value for money. 7 of 11 Inspection Report: Pennine Way Primary School, 10 °11 October 2007 .

p.7

Grade: 3

in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 8 of 11 Inspection Report: Pennine Way Primary School, 10 °11 October 2007

p.8

Inspection judgements

School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate

p.9

Overall effectiveness

How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? No Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The effectiveness of the Foundation Stage 3 The capacity to make any necessary improvements

p.9

Achievement and standards

4 How well do learners achieve? 4 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 3 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress

p.9

learners?

2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 How well learners enjoy their education 3 The attendance of learners 2 The behaviour of learners 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being

p.9

and interests of learners?

3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?

p.9

and interests of learners?

Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 9 of 11 Inspection Report: Pennine Way Primary School, 10 °11 October 2007

p.9

and supporting all learners?

How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 3 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? Yes Does this school require a notice to improve? 10 of 11 Inspection Report: Pennine Way Primary School, 10 °11 October 2007

p.10

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

15 October 2007 Dear Pupils Inspection of Pennine Way Primary School, Cumbria, CA1 3RQ Thank you for making the inspection team welcome during the days we spent with you recently. Although we found many good things, we think your school could do better in some important areas. We are pleased that you like school and that you enjoy your lessons. It is good that you are trying hard to eat healthily and enjoy exercise. Your teachers told us that your behaviour has improved ° well done! The headteacher and all the staff care for you well and are working hard to try to improve your school. However, at the moment quite a lot of you do not make as much progress as you should. So we have given your school a ‘Notice to Improve’. Your writing, in particular, could be much better. We have asked your school to make sure that all your lessons help you to make better progress by always challenging you to do you best. We have asked the school to ensure that more of

p.11

Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection

you attend school more regularly. We hope that you will continue to enjoy school and that you will help your headteacher, the staff and the school governors to improve your work further. Yours sincerely Linda Buller Lead inspector 11 of 11 Inspection Report: Pennine Way Primary School, 10 °11 October 2007

p.11

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion