Schools & FE · School inspection (2005 framework)
St Andrew's Primary School
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspection date verified
2 Nov 2007
- Inspectorssingle source
Kathryn Dodd
- Achievement verified
Satisfactory
- Care guidance support verified
Satisfactory
- Curriculum verified
Satisfactory
- Leadership and management verified
Satisfactory
- Overall effectiveness verified
Satisfactory
- Personal development verified
Good
- Teaching and learning verified
Satisfactory
- Postcode verified
DL14 6RY
- Name on report verified
St Andrew's Primary School
- URN verified
114188
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Grade profile
Each judgement on its scale, weakest to strongest.
- OverallSatisfactory
- AchievementSatisfactory
- Care guidance supportSatisfactory
- CurriculumSatisfactory
- Leadership and managementSatisfactory
- Personal developmentGood
- Teaching and learningSatisfactory
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type graded Satisfactory.
Markers show where typical reports of each grade sit.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 9 of 11 Inspection Report: St Andrew's Primary School, 1 °2 November 2007 p.9
- The good level of care for pupils is seen in the way that staff nurture them well, provide a happy, safe and secure place for them to learn and ensure that they make a strong contribution to their school and local communities. p.4
- As a result, children develop a love of learning and make good progress so that by the beginning of Year 1 they reach close to the levels expected for their age. p.4
- Effective partnerships with external organisations, other schools and within the locality are contributing strongly to school improvement. p.4
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- When children start Reception, their skills, although variable from year to year, are below what is typical for their age, and their communication, language and literacy skills are often very weak. p.4
- Similar information is not always used effectively enough to meet the learning needs of the more able pupils who could sometimes achieve more than teachers expect of them. p.4
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- A small proportion of the schools whose overall effectiveness is judged as satisfactory but which have areas of underperformance will receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next Section 5 inspection. p.5
- Pupils’ achievement is satisfactory and standards by Year 6 are below average. p.5
- In the 2007 assessments at the end of Year 2, standards were below average. p.5
- Although they were slightly lower than in 2006, a higher proportion of pupils had learning difficulties and/or disabilities, and the results represent satisfactory progress from the pupils’ low starting points. p.5
- Standards in reading and writing, however, were higher than in mathematics where they were significantly below average. p.5
- Between Years 3 and 6, pupils continue to make satisfactory progress. p.5
- Unconfirmed results of the 2007 Year 6 national tests were the highest for five years. p.5
- Following a whole-school development focus, there was a significant improvement in English, where results had been significantly below average in 2006. p.5
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 11
- Words of findings
- 2,925
- about usual (typical 2839)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 21 words
- Next steps
- 8
- typical 8
- Hedged sentences
- 13%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
St Andrew's Primary School Inspection report
p.1
114188 Unique Reference Number Durham Local Authority 301687 Inspection number 1 °2 November 2007 Inspection dates Kathryn Dodd Reporting inspector
p.1
This inspection of the school was carried out under section 5 of the Education Act 2005.
p.1
Primary Type of school Community School category 4 °11 Age range of pupils Mixed Gender of pupils Number on roll 117 School The governing body Appropriate authority Mr John Waine (Vice chair) Chair Mrs Margaret Yates Headteacher 1 April 2003 Date of previous school inspection St Andrew's Road School address Bishop Auckland County Durham DL14 6RY 01388 605385 Telephone number 01388 605385 Fax number
p.1
4-11 Age group 1 °2 November 2007 Inspection dates 301687 Inspection number .
p.1
This document may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial educational purposes, provided that the information quoted is reproduced without adaptation and the source and date of publication are stated.
p.2
Further copies of this report are obtainable from the school. Under the Education Act 2005, the school must provide a copy of this report free of charge to certain categories of people. A charge not exceeding the full cost of reproduction may be made for any other copies supplied.
p.2
Introduction
The inspection was carried out by an Additional Inspector.
p.3
Description of the school
Almost all the pupils at this smaller than average sized school are from White British backgrounds. It serves a mixed community that includes an area of considerable social and economic disadvantage. The proportion of pupils entitled to free school meals is above average as is the proportion with learning difficulties and/or disabilities. A higher than average percentage of pupils join or leave the school partway through their primary education. The school has recently been accredited with the Healthy Schools and Activemark awards, and an Impetus award which recognises the school’s commitment to citizenship education.
p.3
Key for inspection grades
Outstanding Grade 1 Good Grade 2 Satisfactory Grade 3 Inadequate Grade 4 3 of 11 Inspection Report: St Andrew's Primary School, 1 °2 November 2007
p.3
Grade: 3
St Andrew’s Primary is a satisfactory and improving school which has some good features. It provides satisfactory value for money. The good level of care for pupils is seen in the way that staff nurture them well, provide a happy, safe and secure place for them to learn and ensure that they make a strong contribution to their school and local communities. Parents are pleased with the changes made since the appointment of the headteacher and think highly of the quality of education their children receive. They particularly appreciate all that the school does to ensure that their children enjoy school, especially the wonderful range of extra-curricular activities on offer. Pupils’ good personal development provides a positive platform on which to improve their academic achievement and to prepare them to become responsible citizens of the future. Pupils make satisfactory progress from a below average starting point so that standards remain
p.4
Grade: 3
below average by Year 6. Children make good progress in the Foundation Stage (Reception class). This is because of good quality teaching and learning and a stimulating and lively curriculum which is matched well to children’s learning needs, allowing them to develop an early thirst for learning. Between Years 1 and 6 (Class 2 to Class 5), pupils make only satisfactory progress as a result of satisfactory teaching and learning and a satisfactory curriculum. Teachers assess pupils’ work regularly to find out what they can do. They use this information well to ensure that pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities get the support they need in order to make good progress. Similar information is not always used effectively enough to meet the learning needs of the more able pupils who could sometimes achieve more than teachers expect of them. The headteacher and deputy headteacher have set the school on a clear pathway of
p.4
Grade: 3
improvement. Their vision, hard work and determination are starting to pay off. Staff and governors share this vision and welcome opportunities for professional development, keen to try out their newly acquired skills. Recent initiatives aimed at improving the quality of provision in English, for example, are starting to have a positive impact on pupils’ achievement. Standards in English improved significantly in 2007 compared to the previous year. However, achievement and standards in mathematics are still too low. Effective partnerships with external organisations, other schools and within the locality are contributing strongly to school improvement. Despite the positive changes that are taking place, there remains a lot to do, particularly to improve the quality of teaching and learning. A clear management structure is in place, but the roles of some staff in checking pupils’ progress and evaluating school improvement are unclear. Little management experience also limits some
p.4
Grade: 3
staff’s ability to be fully involved in school self-evaluation. Nevertheless, the school has an accurate view of its overall effectiveness and this, along with the satisfactory improvement since the previous inspection, demonstrates that it has a satisfactory capacity to improve in the future.
p.4
Grade: 2
When children start Reception, their skills, although variable from year to year, are below what is typical for their age, and their communication, language and literacy skills are often very weak. Good leadership and management ensure a good quality of teaching and learning and a 4 of 11 Inspection Report: St Andrew's Primary School, 1 °2 November 2007 lively and stimulating curriculum. Teachers and support staff work together closely to use assessment information well to ensure that activities match children’s varying learning needs closely. As a result, children develop a love of learning and make good progress so that by the beginning of Year 1 they reach close to the levels expected for their age. However, although children make good progress in developing their communication, language and literacy skills, they remain below expected levels. Staff sometimes miss good opportunities to use activities
p.4
Grade: 2
outdoors to promote language learning. Nevertheless, children’s progress in personal, social and emotional development is particularly marked. This is because adults make the most of almost every opportunity to help children to get along well together, talk about their learning, grow in confidence and behave well.
p.5
What the school should do to improve further
■ Raise standards and accelerate progress in mathematics across the school.
p.5
What the school should do to improve further
■ Use assessment information to plan work that closely matches pupils’ differing learning needs, especially those of the more able. ■ Clarify the roles and extend the skills of staff with management responsibilities so that they can accurately monitor pupils’ progress and contribute to the school’s evaluation of its performance. A small proportion of the schools whose overall effectiveness is judged as satisfactory but which have areas of underperformance will receive a monitoring visit by an Ofsted inspector before their next Section 5 inspection.
p.5
Grade: 3
Pupils’ achievement is satisfactory and standards by Year 6 are below average. In the 2007 assessments at the end of Year 2, standards were below average. Although they were slightly lower than in 2006, a higher proportion of pupils had learning difficulties and/or disabilities, and the results represent satisfactory progress from the pupils’ low starting points. Standards in reading and writing, however, were higher than in mathematics where they were significantly below average. Between Years 3 and 6, pupils continue to make satisfactory progress. Unconfirmed results of the 2007 Year 6 national tests were the highest for five years. Following a whole-school development focus, there was a significant improvement in English, where results had been significantly below average in 2006. However, achievement and standards in mathematics are still too low. The school met its targets for English in 2007 but did not do so
p.5
Grade: 3
in mathematics. Pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities make good progress because they have good support in lessons to complete work that is matched carefully to their individual learning needs. More able pupils do not always make progress at a sufficiently good rate because there are not enough opportunities for them to show what they are capable of.
p.5
Grade: 2
Pupils’ personal development and well-being, including their spiritual, moral, social and cultural development, are good. Pupils are polite and behave well because they have a good understanding of the consequences of their actions. They enjoy school and explain that they are keen to do their best because their achievements are valued highly and celebrated regularly. Pupils make a good contribution to their school and local communities. Older pupils show their growing maturity and confidence by helping with duties around school. Pupils’ good 5 of 11 Inspection Report: St Andrew's Primary School, 1 °2 November 2007 understanding of why they should adopt healthy lifestyles is seen in their enthusiasm for taking part in sporting and other physical activities such as gymnastics and table tennis. Pupils’ growing personal and social skills, along with satisfactory progress in literacy, numeracy and information
p.5
Grade: 2
and communication technology skills, prepare them soundly for secondary school and for becoming responsible young adults. Attendance is satisfactory and, as a result of hard work involving parents and pupils, it is showing signs of improvement.
p.6
Grade: 3
As a result of satisfactory teaching and learning, pupils in Years 1 to 6 make satisfactory progress. Good organisation, clear explanations of lesson objectives, positive relationships and effective management of pupils’ behaviour are strong features of most lessons. Teachers assess pupils regularly to find out what they can already do. They use this information well to ensure that pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities, and those whose learning needs an extra boost, get the support they need to achieve well. However, they sometimes do not challenge more able pupils to build sufficiently well on their existing skills to demonstrate what they are capable of. Staff have responded with enthusiasm to opportunities to improve their teaching, for example by discussing learning targets with pupils and using marking as a means of helping them to improve. Although staff are becoming increasingly confident in following these improved
p.6
Grade: 3
practices, there remain inconsistencies that sometimes hinder the development of pupils’ skills as learners.
p.6
Grade: 3
The curriculum is satisfactory, enabling pupils to make satisfactory progress. A good range of activities beyond the normal school day, such as Spanish, drama and gymnastics, make a strong contribution to pupils’ enjoyment of school. Pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities achieve well because staff adjust the curriculum to take account of their learning needs. Good partnerships with other schools and the community provide an increasing number of opportunities for the more able pupils to respond to new challenges, although these pupils do not always have such opportunities as part of day-to-day provision. A wide range of support programmes to boost learning in English reflects the school’s priority to raise standards in this subject. In mathematics, however, support programmes are limited and pupils do not always have sufficient opportunities to practise their basic numeracy skills through problem solving
p.6
Grade: 3
Care, guidance and support are satisfactory. High quality care ensures that pupils are happy, safe and secure. Pupils say that there is always someone to approach if they are worried. Required procedures for protecting and safeguarding pupils are in place. The school gives high priority to meeting the needs of pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities and those with social and emotional needs. The school’s learning mentor, parent support workers and staff from outside agencies work together closely to ensure that the pupils and their parents benefit from the right kind of support. Parents of pupils who join the school partway through 6 of 11 Inspection Report: St Andrew's Primary School, 1 °2 November 2007 their primary education say that their children settle in particularly well. Academic guidance is satisfactory. Pupils are beginning to understand how good their writing is because teachers
p.6
Grade: 3
sometimes refer to their learning targets in lessons and when they mark pupils’ work. These are recent developments, however, and practice is inconsistent. These developments have not yet been extended to other subjects such as mathematics.
p.7
Grade: 3
Leadership, management and governance are satisfactory. The headteacher and deputy headteacher make a significant contribution to improving the school by selecting priorities for action carefully. As a result of a rigorous approach to tackling weaknesses in English, for example, standards are rising and there is a determination to address the dip in standards in mathematics. Improving the satisfactory quality of teaching and learning also remains a high priority despite recent improvements. Governors and teachers with management responsibilities are keen to make a greater contribution, but their precise roles and involvement are not yet agreed. As a result, the headteacher and deputy headteacher have to oversee much of the work. They are also the major contributors to the school’s self-evaluation. This limits the pace at which things can move forward. Nevertheless, the school has accurately evaluated its
p.7
Grade: 3
effectiveness and identified the right priorities for action. Satisfactory improvements since the previous inspection provide a positive platform upon which to build and give the school a satisfactory capacity for improvement. 7 of 11 Inspection Report: St Andrew's Primary School, 1 °2 November 2007 .
p.7
Grade: 3
in the guidance 'Complaints about school inspection', which is available from Ofsted’s website: www.ofsted.gov.uk. 8 of 11 Inspection Report: St Andrew's Primary School, 1 °2 November 2007
p.8
Inspection judgements
School Overall Key to judgements: grade 1 is outstanding, grade 2 good, grade 3 satisfactory, and grade 4 inadequate
p.9
Overall effectiveness
How effective, efficient and inclusive is the provision of education, integrated care and any extended services in meeting the needs of learners? Yes Effective steps have been taken to promote improvement since the last inspection How well does the school work in partnership with others to promote learners' well-being? 2 The effectiveness of the Foundation Stage 3 The capacity to make any necessary improvements
p.9
Achievement and standards
3 How well do learners achieve? 3 The standards 1 reached by learners How well learners make progress, taking account of any significant variations between groups of learners 2 How well learners with learning difficulties and disabilities make progress
p.9
learners?
2 The extent of learners' spiritual, moral, social and cultural development 2 The extent to which learners adopt healthy lifestyles 2 The extent to which learners adopt safe practices 2 How well learners enjoy their education 3 The attendance of learners 2 The behaviour of learners 2 The extent to which learners make a positive contribution to the community How well learners develop workplace and other skills that will contribute to their future economic well-being
p.9
and interests of learners?
3 How well are learners cared for, guided and supported?
p.9
and interests of learners?
Grade 1 - Exceptionally and consistently high; Grade 2 - Generally above average with none significantly below average; Grade 3 - Broadly average to below average; Grade 4 - Exceptionally low. 9 of 11 Inspection Report: St Andrew's Primary School, 1 °2 November 2007
p.9
and supporting all learners?
How effectively leaders and managers at all levels set clear direction leading to improvement and promote high quality of care and education 3 How effectively leaders and managers use challenging targets to raise standards 3 The effectiveness of the school's self-evaluation How well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve as well as they can How effectively and efficiently resources, including staff, are deployed to achieve value for money The extent to which governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities Yes Do procedures for safeguarding learners meet current government requirements? No Does this school require special measures? No Does this school require a notice to improve? 10 of 11 Inspection Report: St Andrew's Primary School, 1 °2 November 2007
p.10
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
3 November 2007 Dear Pupils Inspection of St Andrew's Primary School, Durham, DL14 6RY Thank you so much for the warm welcome you gave me when I visited your school. I particularly enjoyed being part of your assembly and seeing how proud you are of the certificates and rewards you get to celebrate your achievements. I also enjoyed hearing Class 4 performing the song about `birds of prey’ that has recently been recorded for a radio broadcast. Your behaviour was good and it was pleasing to hear that you feel safe in school because there is always someone on hand, either an adult or a `buddy’, if you need help. All the adults care about you. They help you to grow in confidence, so that you are prepared for going to secondary school at the end of Year 6. It is good to know that you enjoy coming to school and I can see why so many of you take part in after school activities. You have more chances to attend clubs
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
than children in most other schools, especially the younger children. Although your school is a satisfactory school, some things are good. Your learning gets off to a good start in the Reception class. There are many good things happening to help you to reach similar standards by Year 6 to the standards reached by children in most other schools. Your parents have noticed the changes that the school has made recently and are pleased about them. There are some things that could still be better. Some of you told me that you sometimes find your work too easy and I agree with you that it is. The school is going to help you to learn faster, especially in mathematics, by taking more notice of what you can already do and by always giving you work that makes you think hard. All the staff are going to work together in keeping a close eye on how quickly you are learning and how you could do better. You can help your school to become even better by making sure that you tell your teacher if
p.11
Text from letter to pupils explaining the findings of the inspection
your work is too easy for you. You should keep checking all the time what you still have to do to get better at your work and, of course, continue to try your very best in everything that you do. I wish you all the very best for the future. Yours sincerely Kathryn Dodd Additional Inspector 11 of 11 Inspection Report: St Andrew's Primary School, 1 °2 November 2007
p.11
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion