Other · Ofsted letter
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
BB11 2PH
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No standout praise found.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
No strong criticism found.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop RE in the school. p.4
- As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority/SACRE and will be published on Ofsted’s website. p.4
- It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection. p.4
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Progress & outcomes8
“The school has made good progress in implementing the new agreed syllabus.” p.3Communication & language3
“Pupils take turns effectively with their talk partners.” p.1
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 805
- about usual (typical 963)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 48
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 2
- Hedged sentences
- 0%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk
p.1
Mr I McCann Headteacher Rosewood Primary School Rosewood Avenue Burnley Lancashire BB11 2PH
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Religious Education
Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 1 February 2007 to look at work in religious education (RE).
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Religious Education
As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on the implementation of the locally agreed syllabus.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Religious Education
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Religious Education
The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with yourself, the RE subject leader and a group of Year 5 pupils; scrutiny of relevant documentation; analysis of pupils’ work; and observation of lessons in Years 1/2 and 5.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme – Religious Education
The overall effectiveness of RE was judged to be satisfactory.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Achievement is satisfactory. Overall, pupils make satisfactory progress to reach the standards expected for their age. For instance, in their work on Hanukkah, Year 2 pupils can make simple comparisons between the story of the victory of the Maccabees and the nativity. They have an appropriate understanding of the idea of a miracle and use technical vocabulary such as ‘menorah’ accurately. Year 5 pupils understand that Muslims look to the Qur’an for guidance and can make helpful connections between this and their own personal sources of guidance. Pupils approach learning in RE with positive attitudes, behave well in lessons and respond promptly to instructions. Pupils take turns effectively with their talk partners. RE makes a good contribution to pupils’ personal development through a balanced approach to ‘learning about’ and ‘learning from’ religion. They recognise and value the links between aspects of RE, circle time and the SEAL programme and can explain the
p.1
Achievement and standards
contribution RE makes to preparing them for the next stage of their education and life in the wider community.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning
The quality of teaching and learning in RE is good.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning
Lessons are well planned with opportunities at the outset to consolidate previous learning and identify next steps. Pupils know what lessons are about because learning objectives describe in simple terms what they will know, understand or be able to do by the end of the session. A good range of activities build learning effectively, with appropriate opportunities to consolidate progress through, for example, focused talking with partners. Lessons are well managed and proceed at a brisk pace with clear time targets. Interactive whiteboards are used to good effect to extend the range of resources available to stimulate pupils’ interest and further their learning. Marking is thorough, identifies what pupils can do to improve and frequently poses challenging questions for consideration.
p.2
Quality of curriculum
The school meets the statutory requirements of the agreed syllabus and allocates the recommended time for RE to all age groups, an issue identified at the time of the previous inspection. The choice of faiths studied provides a suitable breadth of experience and is well matched to local circumstances. However, opportunities for pupils to extend their understanding through additional activities such as visits are limited. Pupils appreciate the various visitors who enrich their understanding of Christianity. The system for assessing attainment and tracking progress in RE is well- considered and manageable. There are sensible plans to evaluate the effectiveness of newly introduced assessment tasks. In addition, a helpful trial is underway to identify an efficient recording system that quickly allows teachers to see what pupils know, understand and can do.
p.2
Leadership and management of RE
The leadership and management of RE are good.
p.3
Leadership and management of RE
The subject leader is leading the implementation of the new agreed syllabus well. A realistic action plan is in place and progress with this is up to date. Helpfully, developments in RE are closely linked to the school’s overarching priorities. Effective use is being made of local authority guidance and materials, with sensible plans to evaluate how well these meet the needs of pupils and the school. The school is currently introducing new procedures for monitoring all areas of its provision, including RE. At present, systems in RE are informal but the school has a largely accurate view of the subject’s position. This is based, in part, on a good analysis of standards by the subject leader. A clear focus on raising attainment is demonstrated by the focused guidance provided for teachers on how to improve the performance of individual pupils, particularly those working at below and above the expected level.
p.3
Implementation of the agreed syllabus
The school has made good progress in implementing the new agreed syllabus. A revised RE policy reflecting changes to the curriculum has been approved by the governing body. Suitability of resources has been reviewed.
p.3
Inclusion
All pupils are included in RE lessons. Pupils with learning difficulties and/or disabilities make progress at a similar rate to their peers. They receive appropriate levels of challenge and help from support staff. Tasks are differentiated carefully to meet pupils’ needs so that the highest attainers are challenged in their thinking.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
developing the portfolio of pupils’ work to include levelled examples of assessment tasks ensuring, in line with whole school developments, that suitable mechanisms are in place to monitor and evaluate the quality of provision in RE extending the range of visits and visitors to enrich pupils’ learning experiences.
p.4
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop RE in the school.
p.4
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority/SACRE and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion