Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 8 Jul 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Kevin Hodge

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Kevin Hodge

  • Postcode verified

    GL51 8PB

Page 1 of 5
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+10Mostly positivemore positive than 30% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyconsistentlyimprovingconfidentconfidentlyimprovedenjoygood progress
Criticismweaknessesweaknot effectivenot alwaystoo lowlackconcernsinconsistency

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings1060w+15
  • Leadership406w−43
  • What needs to improve68w+67

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
5
Words of findings
1,527
longer than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
10%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 69%Leadership 26%What needs to improve 4%

Full report text

Mrs A Palmer The Headteacher Gloucester Road Primary School Gloucester Road Cheltenham Gloucestershire GL51 8PB

p.1

Introduction

Following my visit to your school on 26 and 27 June with Fran Ashworth, Additional Inspector, I write on behalf of Her Majesty's Chief Inspector to confirm the inspection findings.

p.1

Introduction

The visit was the fourth monitoring inspection since the school became subject to special measures in November 2005.

p.1

Introduction

This letter will be posted on the Ofsted website. Please inform the Regional Inspection Service Provider of any factual inaccuracies within 24 hours of the receipt of this letter.

p.1

Evidence

We observed parts of lessons in all classes, observed lunchtimes and playtimes, scrutinised documents, and met with the associate headteacher and staff. In addition, discussions were held with pupils, the local authority adviser, and the chair of governors.

p.1

Context

The headteacher was absent during the visit. A deputy headteacher was appointed since the last visit and will start in September. One teacher continues to be on long term absence and her class was taught by a temporary teacher. Tribal Group 1-4 Portland Square Bristol BS2 8RR T 0845 123 6001 F 0845 123 6002 T 08456 40 40 40 enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Achievement and standards

Children in the Foundation Stage continue to make satisfactory progress and there are signs that this is increasing due to better teaching. The improvements to class organisation are developing pupils’ abilities more consistently, particularly their physical skills. The better equipped outside activity area is stretching their abilities and improving their motivation to learn.

p.2

Achievement and standards

In Years 1 and 2, the confident teaching seen at the last visit has been consolidated. Pupils’ speaking skills are near to the levels expected, but a few pupils find it more difficult to talk or discuss at length. The school’s own checks and current work indicate that number skills are improving at a satisfactory rate. In Years 3 to 6, standards remain below, but close to, those expected. The school has identified that pupils, particularly the higher attainers, do not achieve well enough in writing. Pupils’ current work indicates that writing skills in other subjects are not always used sufficiently as some activities do not demand enough writing. Pupils make satisfactory gains in their mathematical skills and knowledge, but standards remain below the levels expected for their age. Pupils’ range of spoken vocabulary, noted as weak in the last visit, is improving and many pupils express their opinions confidently

p.2

Achievement and standards

Planning is generally more closely matched to pupils’ needs due to the structures provided by an intensive support programme in mathematics but, in writing for example, some activities are too simple to extend their skills. In the Foundation Stage, independent activities, including using outside areas, are now planned more frequently and effectively.

p.2

Achievement and standards

Progress on the areas for improvement identified by the inspection in November 2005:  raise standards and improve achievement by making sure that learners of all ages are given work to do that meets their needs and capabilities – satisfactory.

p.2

Personal development and well-being

Pupils’ personal development has remained satisfactory. The improved behaviour at break and lunch times is reflected in pupils’ good levels of cooperation and in sharing equipment willingly. Pupils’ behaviour in lessons is not as consistently good, and varies depending on how well routines and expectations are established. Where the class has experienced several changes of teacher, pupils’ behaviour is also not as good. Few pupils are late and, as pupils enjoy school, their attendance is good. Pupils work together in groups increasingly well as they move up the school and willingly listen to each other’s ideas. The school council is slowly beginning to influence some decisions, such as organising events for charity, but it is still not making a significant impact through the school. Members are very quiet in meetings and too many are involved, which makes contributions less forthcoming. Pupils are generally positive about their school. They report that they feel safe and well looked

p.2

Quality of provision

The quality of teaching and learning has some good features but is not consistent through the school as weaknesses still remain in the older age groups. In the Foundation Stage teachers now plan for a fuller range of indoor and outdoor activities. This helps pupils develop a broader range of skills and they enjoy their independent work. In the mixed Year 1 and 2 class, the confident teaching noted in the last visit has been maintained, resulting in pupils making good progress in their basic number and writing skills. In Years 3 to 6, the quality of teaching, whilst satisfactory, is too variable. For example, some activities do not stretch the higher attaining pupils sufficiently, particularly as some activities are pitched too low and do not demand enough of the pupils. Other activities lack pace and sparkle. An exception was seen in the Year 5/6 class, where pupils used their writing skills well when composing an imaginary job application to the NASA space programme.

p.3

Quality of provision

Marking is frequent and helpful in all classes and is supported by pupils having simple targets and self checks to guide their improvement.

p.3

Quality of provision

The curriculum gives a secure framework for most subject areas and is enhanced by the inclusion of French. Mathematics and most areas of English are well planned and assessed. Other subjects are being reorganised into topics to make the curriculum more relevant. Teachers in Years 3 to 6 plan together well and the intensifying support programme ensures that basic skills are covered systematically. The information and communication technology (ICT) curriculum, although satisfactory, is also being revised and improved for September. Pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities make satisfactory progress as the curriculum is effectively simplified for them and is supported effectively by teaching assistants.

p.3

Quality of provision

All the necessary safeguarding procedures are in place to ensure that care, support and guidance are satisfactory. Links with parents are being strengthened as a series of meetings is planned to enable parents to raise any concerns about school and their children’s progress. Teachers make regular assessments of pupils’ progress. The checks in English and mathematics are updated monthly, but are summarised formally only twice during the year. This restricts the ability to see emerging trends and thus reduces the usefulness of the process.

p.3

Quality of provision

Progress on the areas for improvement identified by the inspection in November 2005:  improve the quality of marking in Years 1 and 2 – good  improve the quality and provision of accommodation and resources within the Foundation Stage – good.

p.3

Leadership and management

The headteacher and governors have consolidated the routines and improvements noted in the last visit. Reviews by the local authority (LA) confirm that monitoring procedures are closely connected to priorities in the school improvement plan. Checks on teaching are regular and accurate. The improvements identified are taking time in leading to a more consistent pattern of good teaching. This is partly due to the high number of part-time and temporary teachers currently in Years 3 to 6. Subject coordination has been reviewed and staff have received training. Subject responsibilities have been redistributed because of the appointment of the new deputy headteacher but, as he does not take up post until next term, subject coordination is not yet currently effective. The headteacher is beginning to use the emerging evidence about pupils’ progress, their personal development, and the quality of provision to inform school self-evaluation. This information is guiding

p.3

Leadership and management

priorities for next year, including improving pupils’ writing skills.

p.4

Leadership and management

Governors continue to give the school good support. Their monitoring routines are now firmly established and their committee structures and monitoring are closely aligned with the priorities in the school development plan. There are vacancies for parent governors, despite efforts to fill them. The governors are investigating ways of appointing new governors other than from the parental body. They are increasingly challenging the school to move forward as their monitoring identifies where actions have been less effective.

p.4

Leadership and management

Progress on the areas for improvement identified by the inspection in November 2005:  rectify the weaknesses in the leadership and management of the school – good  improve the rigour and robustness of the self-evaluation and monitoring process – good.

p.4

External support

The local authority has carried out another short review since the last visit. It highlighted accurately some inconsistency in teaching, some ways to improve pupils’ personal development, and the need to raise standards in writing. There continues to be good support generally through the intensifying support programme, as well as support for individual teachers. This is leading to pupils making better progress, following improvements in teaching, particularly in the Foundation Stage and Years 1 and 2. An associate headteacher has given the school good support. He is helping to arrange end-of-term meetings with parents to help foster and develop relationships with them, particularly during the temporary absence of the headteacher.

p.4

Main Judgements

Progress since being subject to special measures – satisfactory.

p.4

Main Judgements

Progress since previous monitoring inspection – satisfactory.

p.4

Main Judgements

Newly qualified teachers may be appointed.

p.4

Priorities for further improvement

 Improve pupils’ writing skills in Years 3 to 6 so they write confidently and accurately in a range of subjects.  Improve the teaching in Years 3 to 6 to a consistently good quality so that all pupils, but particularly the highest attainers, make good progress.

p.5

Priorities for further improvement

I am copying this letter to the Secretary of State, the chair of governors and the Director of Education for Gloucestershire.

p.5

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion