Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 22 Aug 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

    Page 1 of 3
    Page 1 of the report

    Deep dive

    What this report says

    In plain English

    Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

    Tone of the report

    How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

    −5Mixedmore positive than 22% of reports of this type

    In line with other reports of this type.

    Praiseimprovedeffectivelycleareffectiveimproving
    Criticismweaknessesweaknessinsufficientinsufficiently

    How the report reads, start to finish

    Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

    Findings positive critical

    Strengths

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    No standout praise found.

    Concerns

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    Next steps

    Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

    No next steps set out.

    What the report dwells on

    Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

    Anatomy of the report

    How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

    Pages
    3
    Words of findings
    811
    shorter than usual (typical 1049)
    Reading level
    Hard
    Flesch 36, typical 45
    Average sentence
    17 words
    Next steps
    0
    typical 5
    Hedged sentences
    4%
    “some”, “not always”, “most”…

    Where the words go

    Findings 100%

    Full report text

    MONITORING VISIT: MAIN FINDINGS

    Name of Provider: Kingston upon Thames LEA Date of visit: 11 July 2007

    p.1

    Context

    The Royal Borough of Kingston-upon-Thames (RBK) offers adult and community learning through Kingston Adult Education (KAE). This monitoring visit follows the inspection in December 2004 at which KAE was graded as satisfactory for leadership and management and for its arrangements for equality of opportunity. Quality assurance was judged to be unsatisfactory. Health and social care, visual and performing arts, information and communication technology (ICT), English languages and communications and foundation programmes were judged to be satisfactory or better. Hospitality, sport and leisure and travel and family learning were judged satisfactory when reinspected in February 2006.

    p.1

    progress

    At the inspection in 2004, and the reinspection in 2006, inspectors judged retention and achievement rates to be high in most sector subject areas. This applied particularly to ICT, retail and commercial enterprise, health, public services and care, leisure, travel and tourism, and preparation for life and work. Data supplied by KAE indicates that reasonable progress is being made in maintaining high achievement and retention rates. Overall retention and achievement rates for non-accredited and accredited short and long courses are comparable to those at the previous inspection. KAE’s data indicates that success rates for all courses have improved slightly between 2004-05 and 2005-06. For example, overall accredited short course success rates, at 79%, are up by 2%. However, long non-accredited course success rates have remained the same at 82%.

    p.1

    progress

    In 2004 inspectors identified weaknesses in most areas of learning in assessment, planning and monitoring to meet individual learners’ needs. KAE has made significant progress in resolving these weaknesses. Since the inspection, considerable time has been spent reviewing and developing individual learning plan paperwork. It now meets the needs of particular groups of learners. In childcare, the new individual learning plan includes sections for setting individual learning goals and recording learners’ progress. The plans are updated each week and are a useful tool for setting and monitoring targets. Staff are now better able to define individual targets that are achievable and measurable. In English for speakers of other languages (ESOL) programmes, learners are now more involved in initially assessing their current knowledge and setting their own learning targets. Initial assessment on ICT programmes has also been improved and tutors have better information about

    p.1

    progress

    learners’ prior knowledge and skills. Staff confidence in recognising and recording progress and achievement is increasing.

    p.2

    progress

    At the previous full inspection inspectors identified the weakness of insufficient sharing of good practice across and within curriculum areas. KAE has made significant progress in highlighting the purpose and importance of sharing good practice. Managers set clear direction and ensure that good practice is used to improve the quality of teaching and learning. For example, workshops are held where tutors can bring their teaching and learning ideas to share with others, new tutors are mentored, and DVDs are available for learners to take home to learn correct movement and techniques. Exemplars of course reviews provide a useful guide for course managers to assess the quality of their curriculum area. Course reviews and lesson observations are also used to identify good practice.

    p.2

    progress

    At the previous full inspection, the lesson observation scheme was not adequate as a means of effectively raising standards. The feedback related mainly to teaching and paperwork. The observation scheme did not focus sufficiently on learners’ individual needs, attainment or progress. Since the previous inspection, KAE has made significant progress in reviewing and improving the paperwork used to record observations of teaching and learning. The new paperwork directs the observer to make judgements on learning. Observers are effectively implementing these new aspects. An annual moderation meeting takes place at which grades, qualitative information and judgements are discussed and compared. KAE decided not to disclose lesson grades to the tutors to emphasise the developmental aspects of the process. Much thought has been given to making the best use of the information from observations to identify themes for staff development, to contribute to self-

    p.2

    progress

    assessment, to increase managers’ knowledge of the curriculum, to identify teachers’ particular skills, and to collect learner feedback.

    p.2

    progress

    In 2004, inspectors judged the self-assessment process to be mostly consultative and the report to be insufficiently critical or evaluative. The current self-assessment process and report are more consultative and evaluative. The report is clear and well structured. The systems for course reviews, tutor self-evaluation and learner evaluation are now much more effective. Course reviews are more useful as quality improvement tools. The quality improvement plan links well to the self-assessment report. The system for collecting and collating information has improved and the report contains a range of pertinent data and information, such as a useful analysis of participation and success rates by different minority ethnic groups.

    p.3

    progress

    the information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).

    p.3

    Discuss this inspection

    Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

    Join the discussion