Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Postcode verified
BB1 2SE
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
Teaching & assessment17
“The quality of assessment in geography is inadequate.” p.2Leadership & governance3
“Geography leadership and management are inadequate.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 886
- about usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 40, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 15 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 3%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs Grimshaw Headteacher Audley Community Infant School Queen’s Park Road Blackburn BB1 2SE
p.1
Ofsted Subject Inspection Programme 2006/7 – Geography
Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 05 February 2007 to look at work in geography.
p.1
Ofsted Subject Inspection Programme 2006/7 – Geography
As well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on the global dimension in geography.
p.1
Ofsted Subject Inspection Programme 2006/7 – Geography
The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.
p.1
Ofsted Subject Inspection Programme 2006/7 – Geography
The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of three lessons.
p.1
Ofsted Subject Inspection Programme 2006/7 – Geography
The overall effectiveness of geography was judged to be satisfactory.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Pupils’ achievement is good although standards remain low.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Pupils enter the school with standards that are well below average but by the end of Key Stage 1 their standards are only just below those expected nationally so this represents good achievement. Pupils have a growing understanding of the importance of expressing their opinions. They can plan journeys, are aware of landmarks and are developing good skills in direction finding. They have only limited Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 0207 4216855 www.ofsted.gov.uk awareness of environmental issues. This is because coverage of the programme of study for geography is not formally monitored. Pupils are achieving well in geography as a result of the strong focus on speaking and listening skills. The overall personal development and well being of pupils is satisfactory. Attendance is unsatisfactory mainly due to the extended holidays that some pupils take. Attitudes to learning are very positive.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Pupils behave well and stay on task as a result of teachers’ high expectations. Pupils show clear enjoyment of their learning.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning
The quality of teaching and learning in geography is satisfactory.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning
Teachers use a good variety of teaching and learning strategies, particularly role play and practical activities. Teaching is responsive to pupils’ preferred learning styles. The pace is good since teachers manage transitions well. Teachers are very effective managers of the learning environment. Planning is well focused through key questions and well phrased learning objectives which are shared with pupils. However, planning does not include assessment opportunities and does not plan for differentiation other than through pupils’ different levels of response to the tasks set. Although writing is modelled to support pupils’ learning, there is insufficient emphasis on new geographical vocabulary. A good range of resources is used in lessons but the range of geography specific resources available for teachers to include in their plans is more limited. A range of support staff make effective inputs to support pupils’
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning
learning and contribute to teaching. The quality of assessment in geography is inadequate. In the reception class there is good tracking of the progress that pupils make with their knowledge and understanding of the world. In Key Stage 1, although teachers assess learning informally through questioning and observations of pupils, there is no formal monitoring of progress. There is no indication whether pupils are working at national expectations or whether they are receiving appropriate levels of challenge or support. Pupils receive good oral feedback on the quality of their work through one to one discussions with their teachers.
p.2
Quality of curriculum
The quality of the curriculum is satisfactory.
p.2
Quality of curriculum
The curriculum is not formally planned and monitored to ensure coverage or to identify the adequacy of time allocations. Pupils have a good range of experiences of learning outside the classroom. The teachers make good use of the school grounds and the local neighbourhood to develop fieldwork skills. Visit to sites further away, such as a country park, help pupils to understand contrasting environments. Curriculum activities are well matched to pupils’ social, emotional and intellectual needs. Independent work is encouraged but pupils do not have sufficient opportunities for geographical enquiry.
p.2
Subject leadership and management
Geography leadership and management are inadequate.
p.3
Subject leadership and management
The school does not have a clear picture of the strengths and weaknesses of its provision for geography. There are no formal procedures through which the co-ordinator can gather assessment information to identify trends, monitor the quality of teaching and learning or evaluate teachers’ resource and professional development needs. The current development plan is appropriately focused on checking whether curriculum requirements are met within the new topic structure but there is insufficient emphasis on how the quality of provision might be evaluated. The co-ordinator has the capacity to make the improvements needed if relevant support for the leadership and management of the subject were to be made available.
p.3
Subject issue: the global dimension
Pupils’ learning about the global dimension is good.
p.3
Subject issue: the global dimension
Pupils have good knowledge of a range of distant places. They understand some simple differences between their home environment and that of distant countries such India and Pakistan. When pupils take extended holidays abroad they are given learning packs to encourage them to take photographs and record their experiences through drawing and writing. When pupils complete the work it is shared with other pupils and contributes to their geographical understanding. There are excellent opportunities through the link with a school in Pakistan to raise pupils’ awareness of the global dimension.
p.3
Inclusion
There are no apparent discrepancies in the achievement of different groups of pupils in geography lessons. Pupils with English as an additional language (EAL) and those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities receive good individual and group support. Teachers do not regularly plan differentiated approaches to ensure that all pupils receive appropriate challenge and support.
p.3
Areas for improvement
We discussed areas for development that the school may wish to consider, including:
p.4
Areas for improvement
promoting procedures for subject self-evaluation, leadership and management ensuring that the curriculum meets statutory requirements developing assessment practices in geography extending the range of geography resources.
p.4
Areas for improvement
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop geography in the school.
p.4
Areas for improvement
As I explained, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.
p.4
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion