Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 1 Jun 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Tom Winskill

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Tom Winskill

  • Postcode verified

    MK19 7AN

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+24Mostly positivemore positive than 36% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseeffectivelyrapid progresswell plannedmake good progressenjoyeffectivestrengthsclear
Criticismweaknessesnot alwaystoo fewlack

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings319w+36
  • Leadership145w−56
  • What needs to improve86w+50

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
529
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 40, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 46%Leadership 21%What needs to improve 12%About the inspection 20%

Full report text

Mrs Mears Interim Headteacher Haversham Village School The Crescent Haversham Milton Keynes Buckinghamshire MK19 7AN

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – geography

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 29 January 2007 to look at work in geography.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – geography

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on the global dimension.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – geography

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – geography

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of two lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – geography

The overall effectiveness of geography was judged to be satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement and standards are satisfactory.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Standards are above average. Pupils are able to articulate their good understanding of aspects of the geography of their local area and good knowledge of the wider world.  Pupils make satisfactory progress in developing knowledge, skills and understanding as a result of satisfactory teaching and good curriculum provision. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk  The quality of pupils’ written and other work does not always match their understanding of the subject.  Pupils enjoy their geography lessons.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning

 Lessons are well planned, enabling pupils of different ability to make at least satisfactory progress. Where activities are more challenging, pupils make good progress as they respond well and are given good support and encouragement.  The use of interactive white boards effectively enhances teaching and pupils are engaged by a variety of well-resourced activities.  There are too few opportunities for pupils to extend their writing in geography, which limits their eventual progress.  Teaching assistants provide effective support when pupils are working individually or in small groups but are less well deployed during whole class teaching.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

 The school makes good use of the local area through fieldwork and other visits.  The pupils have good knowledge of the United Kingdom and the wider world through good use of atlases and other resources.  The school makes good use of pupils’ own experiences of different places, both locally and further afield, to enhance the curriculum provision for all pupils.  There are clear links made between the geography curriculum and other curriculum areas such as literacy and information and communication technology.

p.2

Leadership and management

Leadership and management are satisfactory.

p.2

Leadership and management

 You and your subject co-ordinator have a good understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the subject. This, together with whole- school planning to improve writing and further enhancement of the geography curriculum, ensures that the capacity to improve is good.  Schemes of work are adequate but lack detail. The newly developed geography policy statement provides a good overview of provision in the subject.  Arrangements for assessment are satisfactory but information on standards achieved by pupils is not used to monitor and track their progress in sufficient detail.

p.2

Subject issue: the global dimension

Pupils’ learning about the global dimension is good.

p.3

Subject issue: the global dimension

 Pupils have a good awareness of other parts of the world because of the good curriculum provision and its enhancement through use of pupils’ personal experiences.  Pupils have a good understanding of the impact of pollution on the environment.

p.3

Inclusion

 Planning for teaching and learning takes account of the needs and aptitudes of all pupils.  Groups and individuals are effectively supported in the classroom.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 developing procedures to record assessment more frequently so that assessment information can contribute to planning for more rapid progress  providing more opportunities for pupils to develop their writing in geography.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop geography in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion