Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 1 Jun 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Jenny Smith

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Jenny Smith

  • Postcode verified

    SP6 3NA

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+93Very positivemore positive than 98% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellentoutstandingeffectivelyvery wellmake good progresseffectivepositivelykeen
Criticismnot yet

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings522w+89
  • Leadership215w+87
  • What needs to improve95w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
805
about usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
7%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 53%Leadership 22%What needs to improve 10%About the inspection 16%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mr M Saxby Headteacher Western Downland Cof E Aided Primary School Rockbourne Fordingbridge Hampshire SP6 3NA

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme - Geography

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 17 January 2007 to look at work in geography.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme - Geography

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on the emphasis placed on the global dimension of the subject.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme - Geography

The visit provided valuable information, which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme - Geography

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with the headteacher and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of two lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme - Geography

The overall effectiveness of geography was judged to be good with a number of outstanding features.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Most pupils arrive at the school with skills and abilities that are a little above average for their age, by the end of Year 6 standards are above average in comparison with the national expectation.  Pupils make good progress in their understanding of geographical concepts and themes as they progress through the school. In particular, they have a good knowledge of the local area and the processes that create features of a river. These build on good foundations in the Reception Year and Year 1.  Pupils were interested in their work, applied themselves well to the tasks set and engaged readily with each other on paired and group activities.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning

The quality of teaching and learning is good with some outstanding features.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 Teachers’ good subject knowledge, outstanding lesson planning and effective use of questioning techniques enhanced the quality of geography lessons.  A growing use of new technologies (inter-active white boards) aids the quality of pupils’ learning.  A good range of resources is used, especially to support local area work. This was exemplified when a local cartographer helped pupils with a mapping exercise in Year 2.  Pupils’ work is mostly correctly assessed against the National Curriculum levels. However, sometimes levels are inappropriately given where pupils have copied work directly from the internet and not utilised it to tell the event in their own words.  An excellent planning project has been set up in Years 1 and 2 with local parish planners. Pupils were learning a great deal from this activity, which was also supporting pupils’ understanding of neighbourhood democracy. It also provided

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

‘food for thought’ for the local planners about how much children’s views can be positively taken into account when planning decisions are made.  Pupils’ learning is good. For example, pupils in Year 5 had effectively collected and interpreted data on Bournemouth in order to understand leisure facilities for family holidays.  An excellent range of fieldwork and excursions are organised, including a trip to Bournemouth and one to Sparsholt Agricultural College. Here pupils developed a very keen awareness of the need for recycling and used their own packed lunches to assess their impact on the environment.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 An excellent document has been drawn up to identify where progression in ideas and concepts might be applied but this is not yet reflected in all the geography topics.  Outstanding schemes of work guide the teaching, which identify key vocabulary to be learnt and ensures that an enquiry-based approach is taken in many topics.  The study of other parts of the world is less well covered than the local area.  The range and type of fieldwork is extensive and includes visits to Hengistbury Head and a residential trip to Wales. Health and safety issues are addressed well when planning fieldwork.

p.2

Leadership and management

The quality of leadership and management is outstanding.

p.3

Leadership and management

 The senior members of staff managing the curriculum on this split site school do so very effectively. They work very well in partnership.  An outstanding geography policy guides the work in this subject and addresses well the issues of Every Child Matters.  Excellent understanding of monitoring and evaluation ensures that teachers are well informed and keep track of the progress pupils are making.  An appropriate action plan has been drawn up for 2006-2007.  Parents are kept informed each half term through an excellent curriculum newsletter from each year group. This provides good feedback to parents, for example, in a recent edition, parents were asked to help ensure that all children knew their home addresses. It had been apparent in a local area study that this was not the case.  It is to be commended that governors have played an active part in deciding whether ‘best value’ was achieved for a particular school visit to Fishbourne.

p.3

Subject issue: The global dimension

 A productive link has been formed with Layibi School in Uganda. This is expanding pupils’ horizons and their understanding of other cultures and ways of life. Considerable potential exists in this link to expand the topic to demonstrate inter-dependence and sustainability on a global scale.

p.3

Inclusion

 Good attention is paid to ensuring all pupils are catered for and work is provided that is suitably challenging for all.

p.3

Areas for improvement

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include the need to:

p.3

Areas for improvement

 consider developing a broader global dimension to the curriculum, especially for older pupils, by expanding the study of Layibi school and its surrounding area in Uganda  ensure that all topics have appropriate progression in the knowledge, skills and concepts when geographical topics are taught. As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion