Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted letter

Setting

Inspected — · published 1 Jun 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Stephanie Matthews

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Stephanie Matthews

  • Postcode verified

    BA3 5TE

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+90Very positivemore positive than 98% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praisevery effectiveoutstandingvery wellenthusiasmenjoyeffectivelyrichsupportive

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings534w+86
  • Leadership190w+75
  • What needs to improve54w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
754
shorter than usual (typical 963)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 52, typical 48
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
2
typical 2
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 60%Leadership 21%What needs to improve 6%About the inspection 13%

Full report text

Alexandra House 33 Kingsway Holborn London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Mrs J Wells Headteacher Kilmersdon Church of England Primary School School Lane Kilmersdon Somerset BA3 5TE

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – History

Thank you for your hospitality and cooperation, and that of your staff, during my visit on the 12 January to look at work in history.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – History

The visit provided valuable information that will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – History

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of lessons.

p.1

History

The overall effectiveness of history was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and Standards

Achievement and standards of pupils in history are good overall.

p.1

Achievement and Standards

 Progress in history throughout the school is good.  Attainment at the end of Key Stage 1 is broadly average but standards are above average at the end Key Stage 2.  Pupils in Year 6 show a high level of knowledge and understanding and very secure skills in history.  Attitudes towards history are very good as is shown by response in lessons and the way pupils discuss their work with real interest and enthusiasm.  They say that they really enjoy the wide range of trips, visits and visitors that the school uses to enhance their work in history.  By Year 6 pupils show real empathy for and understanding of people in the past. The quality of their response in drama and in assemblies with a historical theme adds a valuable spiritual dimension to their learning.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning

The quality of teaching and learning in history is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 Teaching was good or better in all the lessons observed.  Teachers have good subject knowledge and they use a range of strategies to make learning exciting and enjoyable.  Pupils work independently and in groups. Tasks and resources are varied to support individuals. However, even more could be done to support those who have the ability to reach the very highest standards.  Teachers are good at telling the story of events in the past while also ensuring a development of skills for example in the use of time lines and eye witness accounts.  ICT is used well by teachers and pupils.  Work is marked carefully and pupils are given guidance on how to improve. Questioning was used particularly effectively in the lessons observed.  More use could be made of opportunities to develop and use skills in numeracy.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

The quality of the curriculum is outstanding.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 The existing curriculum has a very real focus on local studies in both key stages. The use of local contexts wherever possible and the emphasis on the history of the school and its place in the village are both very valuable.  The recent refocus on cross – curricular links and support for literacy is proving very effective.  The use of museums and visits provides a very rich experience for pupils.

p.2

Care and guidance

 Teachers and support staff provide a very good quality of care.  Pupils work in a safe and attractive environment where their ideas and contribution are really valued.  Great care is taken in planning the range of trips, visits and residential activities.

p.3

Leadership and Management

 Senior management is very supportive of work in history and is using the forthcoming tercentenary of the school to encourage all pupils to understand its role in the community.  The two recently appointed co-ordinators have improved provision and have taken up the opportunity for training in the use of ICT in humanities.  The school is aware of the need to ensure that pupils’ skills in history are recognised when they enter Year7 to ensure effective transition between Key Stages 2 and 3.  Governors are involved in subject work and fully support the creative and reflective approach to curriculum planning.

p.3

Literacy and ICT

Standards of speaking and listening are good and teachers encourage pupils to express their views and share ideas. Writing skills are developed very well in topic books and there are many opportunities for extended writing and for writing for a range of purposes and audiences. By Year 6 research skills are good and good use is now being made of computers in the classroom. Teachers are skilled in the use of computer technology and pupils use computers for research and to enhance the presentation of their work.

p.3

Inclusion and provision for the gifted and talented

Provision is very inclusive and support for those with learning difficulties and disabilities is very effective and ensures that they play a full part in the life of the school. There is a register of pupils with particular gifts and talents and overall they are catered for well. There is the potential to offer extra challenge for them in history via work in numeracy as many have been identified as having particular gifts in mathematics.

p.3

Areas for improvement:

 ensure that higher ability pupils are challenged more, in particular by introducing number-based work.

p.4

Areas for improvement:

As I explained in my previous letter a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s web site. It will be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion