Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 1 Jun 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Mark Sims

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Mark Sims

  • Postcode verified

    UB8 3QU

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+75Very positivemore positive than 76% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisesuccessfullystrongsuccessfulhigh expectationssupportiveoutstandingvery welleffective
Criticismat risknot alwaysexclusions

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings803w+68
  • Leadership237w+77
  • What needs to improve94w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
1,095
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 71%Leadership 21%What needs to improve 8%

Full report text

Mr Ross Macdonald Headteacher Meadow High School Royal Lane Hillingdon Uxbridge UB8 3QU

p.1

parent and carer involvement in children and young people’s education

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, parents and pupils, during my visit on 6 February 2007 to look at the degree and effectiveness of parent and carer involvement in children’s education.

p.1

parent and carer involvement in children and young people’s education

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

parent and carer involvement in children and young people’s education

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff, parents and pupils, and scrutiny of relevant documentation. The judgements are specifically in relation to the degree and effectiveness of parent and carer involvement under the following headings.

p.1

parent and carer involvement in children and young people’s education

The overall effectiveness of the degree and effectiveness of parent and carer involvement in children’s education was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards including personal development

The impact of parental and carer involvement on achievement, standards and personal development is good. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk  Pupils make good progress. There are high expectations for pupils, some of whom go on to successfully take GCSE and A level to a high standard in art, and in other subjects, where appropriate.  The strong support of parents and their high opinion of the school leads to a high retention in the sixth form which enables pupils to take further external examinations.  Attendance is close to the national average for all schools.  The rate of fixed term exclusions has been falling dramatically since 2003 and there have been no permanent exclusions in two years.  Parents have a high awareness of the school’s policy and procedures on behaviour and are supportive of the school which has successfully reduced the level of inappropriate language spoken by pupils.

p.1

Achievement and standards including personal development

 Pupils with behavioural difficulties have been successfully engaged in a gardening club which parents have supported.  The Friends of Meadow High contribute to personal development through organising social events such as discos for the children which they thoroughly enjoy.  For pupils with medical needs, parents have accompanied them on trips to enable them to participate in events.  Parents have written information available on options and have a meeting to hear about arrangements but do not always get to hear from subject specialists.

p.2

guidance

The impact of parent and carer involvement in these areas is good.

p.2

guidance

 A range of information is available to parents to support their children through the school website, newsletters and specific leaflets on supporting children at home. Information on the website is not widely read however.  Where parents have acquired specific skills and knowledge in particular syndromes the school draws on their expertise, for example a talk on autism by a parent for parents and staff.  Parents have contributed to pupils’ learning in food workshops at Easter and Christmas and have participated on trips abroad.  Pupils report that parents are very supportive in their homework “without giving us the answers”.  The school’s plans to share pupils’ assessment information on the web will be a powerful tool for parents to use to support their children’s learning.  Parents have a detailed knowledge of their children’s progress, reading levels and National Curriculum levels.  The school’s extensive support for pupils’ academic, social and physical needs

p.2

guidance

is outstanding and ensures close working partnerships with parents. The school knows its pupils and parents very well and is able to plan to meet individual needs.  The school is successful in involving parents in its reward activities.  Parents do not feel fully equipped to support their children in reading at home.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

The impact of parental involvement on the quality of the curriculum is good.

p.3

Quality of the curriculum

 Parents have contributed to the curriculum through fund raising (Friends of Meadow) for resources in technology, history and French.  Parents have supported extra curricular activities such as Saturday morning food workshops and accompanied their children on trips.  Pupils follow individualised courses of study which have been tailor made for them.  Parents are regularly updated on curriculum issues through newsletters.  Curriculum evenings are held regularly for parents; a meeting on work experience for parents was attended by older pupils speaking of their experience.

p.3

Leadership and management of parent and carer involvement

Leadership and management in relation to parental involvement are good.

p.3

Leadership and management of parent and carer involvement

 The headteacher and deputy headteacher in partnership with all staff have worked successfully to establish a whole school ethos which ensures there is a welcoming atmosphere for parents. There is an “open door” approach although no policy in place.  The leadership team has a strong commitment to supporting parents and careers and is successful in meeting individual needs.  Parents play a strategic role through their significant contribution to the governing body.  Arrangements for transition from primary to secondary are especially strong with work starting as early as Year 5.  Parents are well represented on the governing body and serve in key positions chairing committees.  Parents are regularly consulted and the school acts upon the responses it receives. It has a very good knowledge of the views of parents.  The school communicates well with parents through newsletters, leaflets the website but has no check on how widely read or acted upon the information

p.3

Leadership and management of parent and carer involvement

received.  The pupils’ link book is an effective way of communicating between home and school and is highly valued by pupils and parents.  The school has established key non teaching posts to provide support for pupils and establish closer links with parents.  Training workshops are under developed and there is no place for parents to meet, although plans are in place to address these issues.

p.3

Inclusion

The impact of parent and carer involvement on inclusion is good.

p.4

Inclusion

 The school identifies pupils as individuals and works successfully to meet their individual academic and social needs.  Pupils who were at risk from disengaging from learning are successfully integrated into the classroom and many go on to receive recognised qualifications.  The school is successful in involving parents with their children’s learning by effective communication and consultation.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 closer monitoring of parents who do not attend annual review meetings to establish trends and reasons for non attendance  ensure parents receive opportunities for training to back up the guidance and information they receive.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop parental involvement even further in the school.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on the Ofsted website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion