Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 14 May 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Postcode verified

    WN2 1RU

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+20Mostly positivemore positive than 34% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseconfidentclearenthusiasticskilledeffectivelykeenimprovingprecise
Criticismnot alwaysdeclinevariablelowernot successfully

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings408w−11
  • Leadership142w+64
  • What needs to improve104w+33

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No standout praise found.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
628
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Fairly hard
Flesch 51, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
5%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 52%Leadership 18%What needs to improve 13%About the inspection 16%

Full report text

Mr Fogg The Headteacher Our Lady's RC Primary School Holly Road Aspull Wigan Lancashire WN2 1RU

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme: English

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 27 March to look at work in English.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme: English

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject the visit had a particular focus on our current survey theme: provision for poetry. The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme: English

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of five lessons. The overall effectiveness of English was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement and standards in English are good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Pupils achieve well from starting points on entry which are broadly average. 2006 results in the end of Key Stage 2 tests rose to well above average.  Assessments for pupils at the end of Key Stage 1 in 2006 showed standards to be average – a decline from those in previous years. Pupils, particularly boys, did less well in writing.  Current standards are above average because pupils learn to recognize and use different techniques for varying purposes in their writing. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk  Pupils develop into confident, mature and interested learners. However, the neatness of written work is variable and many pupils speak too quietly in class discussion, limiting the value of what they have to say.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning of English

The quality of teaching and learning is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of English

 Lessons are very thoroughly planned with good attention to the individual needs of pupils. Teaching assistants are fully involved, both in supporting learning and assessing pupils’ progress.  Whilst marking is regular and assessment systems are good, too much marking does not give exact guidance to pupils about how to improve.  Teachers make stimulating use of interactive whiteboards and computers, teaching pupils alternative means of presentation as well as important life skills.  Class discussion is brisk and interesting but quieter pupils are not always successfully drawn into it by teachers’ questions.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

 Curriculum planning ensures that pupils are provided with a good range of activities and approaches. A wide range of written genres is studied.  Teachers make good links between subjects so that pupils extend their literacy skills in areas such as history, geography, and religious education.  Pupils in lower Key Stage 2 would benefit from more guidance in their reading choices.  In response to a criticism in the previous report, teachers plan and use drama and speaking and listening activities well.

p.2

Leadership and management of English

 Work in English is highly organised. Administrative paperwork is thorough yet accessible.  Detailed analysis of data, coupled with careful checking of lessons, and pupils’ books, give a clear view of what works best and where change is needed.  Good leadership and clear communication by the coordinator result in all teachers understanding their role in developing pupils’ English skills.

p.2

Provision for poetry

 Pupils are enthusiastic about poetry, even younger ones being keen and able to explain what they like, and to repeat favourite lines they have learned.  Pupils gain a good understanding of different poetry forms and poems from other cultures.  Whilst they are skilled at spotting techniques and using them in their own work, some pupils are clumsy in the way they use rhyme and imagery.  Both teachers and pupils see poetry as an integral part of English.

p.3

Inclusion

 Very good relationships mean that all pupils feel valued and confident to work in groups.  Underachievement is quickly spotted and strategies to tackle it are put in place and checked.  Differentiation for both higher and lower attainers is carefully and thoughtfully planned. Classroom assistants work very effectively alongside teachers.  The gap between boys’ and girls’ achievement has widened in Key Stage 1.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 improving writing standards by the end of Key Stage 1  making sure that all pupils regularly get precise guidance about how to do better with written work  using questioning strategies which will ensure that all pupils benefit from class discussion.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop English in the school. As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term and made available to the team for the next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion