Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 8 Jun 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Clive Kempton

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Clive Kempton

  • Postcode verified

    N3 1NR

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+78Very positivemore positive than 79% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingexemplarystrongextremelyenjoyconsistentlysupportiveenthusiastic
Criticisminsufficient

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings406w+74
  • Leadership159w+58
  • What needs to improve155w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
698
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 39, typical 45
Average sentence
16 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
4%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 42%Leadership 16%What needs to improve 16%About the inspection 25%

Full report text

Mr N. Marlow Headteacher Moss Hall Junior School Nether Street Finchley London N3 1NR

p.1

Ofsted subject inspection programme – Music

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit with Marian Harker HMI on Monday 22 and Tuesday 23 January 2007 to look at work in music.

p.1

Ofsted subject inspection programme – Music

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject, the visit had a particular focus on the extent to which every pupil was benefiting from your music provision. In particular, it sought to explore the links you may have developed with other schools and agencies, such as the local Music Service.

p.1

Ofsted subject inspection programme – Music

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text unless to highlight exceptional practice. In such circumstances the school would be contacted prior to publication to agree the exact wording. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted subject inspection programme – Music

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of audio and video recordings, observation of four lessons and two singing assemblies, observation of the School Wind Band and two individual musical instrument lessons.

p.1

Ofsted subject inspection programme – Music

The overall effectiveness of music was judged to be good with some outstanding features particularly in the teaching of singing. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement and standards in music are satisfactory with some good features.

p.2

Achievement and standards

 The quality of singing throughout the school is good. Pupils sing accurately in unison and in parts. Extra-curricular choirs also achieve good standards.  Pupils could achieve even higher standards in music with more focused assessments, and by ensuring the curriculum fully meets the needs of all pupils, thus accelerating the pace of learning.  The personal development of pupils is outstanding. Behaviour is exemplary and pupils obviously enjoy music, co-operate well, perform extensively in the community and play classroom instruments in a mature manner.  Pupils achieve good instrumental standards with visiting instrumental teachers.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning in music

The quality of teaching is consistently good and often outstanding.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning in music

 Teachers have good subject knowledge and engage pupils well in a wide range of practical activities.  The teaching of singing is outstanding. Teachers use a wide range of different activities to motivate and extend pupils’ vocal skills.  Assessment is satisfactory. There are formative and summative systems in place for the regular recording of pupils’ achievements which inform teachers’ planning. However, there is insufficient focus on what pupils need to do next to further improve.  Good support is provided for pupils learning a musical instrument through regular individual lessons; by using their instruments in lessons to compose and perform; and through the wide range of opportunities in extra-curricular music groups. There are strong links with parents who are very supportive of the music provision.

p.2

Quality of the music curriculum and extra-curricular provision

The quality of the music curriculum is satisfactory overall and extra-curricular provision is good.

p.2

Quality of the music curriculum and extra-curricular provision

 As well as regular music lessons with a specialist music teacher, pupils also have an additional forty-five minutes singing each week and this accounts for the higher standards of singing in the school.  The current scheme of work hinders pupils’ progress, as pupils are not given enough opportunity within each lesson to extend their learning.  The range of extra-curricular provision is impressive. Large numbers of pupils take the opportunity to participate in a wide range of choirs, bands, orchestras and other groups. Music is also featured in other areas of the school.

p.2

Leadership and management of music

The leadership and management of music are satisfactory with some good features.

p.3

Leadership and management of music

 The enthusiastic and dedicated specialist music teachers work extremely hard to provide an extensive range of musical opportunities. However, subject improvement plans and the slightly over-generous self-evaluation require a sharper focus on further raising standards.  The school has a designated music room and three practice rooms that are well resourced and extensively used.

p.3

Data Collection

 The collection of a range of background data about pupils’ musical experiences is currently satisfactory. Informal procedures are in place, initially collected by class teachers.

p.3

Partnership Links

 Good links are made with the Barnet music service which provides seven instrumental teachers to support music provision, and uses the school extensively for evening and weekend music ensemble rehearsals. In addition, other community music groups use the facility extensively.  Good links have also been made with other agencies, such as West End casting agencies which regularly use pupils as part of their productions.

p.3

Inclusion

 Inclusion is a strength of the school. All pupils are involved in music and all are given the opportunity to learn a musical instrument. All play recorders in Year 3 and all sing regularly to a high standard.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 reviewing and evaluating the music scheme of work to ensure that all pupils make even quicker progress  sharpening assessment procedures so that pupils understand what they need to do next to further improve  strengthening music subject leadership and management, especially improvement planning, in order to further raise standards. I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop Music in the school.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.4

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

In 6-12 months after the inspection visit, we would like to gather information on the impact of this inspection on the improvements in this subject in your school. To this end you may be contacted by telephone or sent a questionnaire to complete. We appreciate your co-operation in this evaluation.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion