Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 8 Jun 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

John Mitcheson

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    John Mitcheson

  • Postcode verified

    RM8 1JU

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+89Very positivemore positive than 92% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingexceptionallyexcellenthighly effectivegood progresshigh expectationsvery wellwell planned
Criticisminsufficientlimitednot accuratenot clearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings622w+86
  • Leadership198w+88
  • What needs to improve92w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
890
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 41, typical 45
Average sentence
20 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 68%Leadership 22%What needs to improve 10%

Full report text

Mr P Grant Headteacher Robert Clack School Gosfield Road Dagenham Essex RM8 1JU

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – Physical Education.

p.1

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 17 and 18 October 2006 to look at work in Physical Education (PE).

p.1

As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of PE, the visit had a particular focus on the Physical Education School Sport and Club Links (PESSCL) strategy.

p.1

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff, pupils and the school sports coordinator (SSCo), scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of four lessons.

p.1

The overall effectiveness of PE was judged to be outstanding.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement and standards are outstanding.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Attainment at the end of Key Stage 3 is above national average. Year 9 boys demonstrate well-developed handling skills in rugby and know how to plan and apply attacking strategies to score. In netball, girls send and receive with accuracy and consistency. They can work Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6644 www.ofsted.gov.uk independently in small groups to plan and rehearse complex tactics before applying them in a game.  In Key stage 4 the standards achieved in boys’ rugby, girls’ netball and gymnastics are outstanding. GCSE PE results dipped slightly this year but remained well above average with over two thirds achieving at least a C grade and all pupils achieving a pass.  The standard of PE kit is excellent; attitudes and behaviour are outstanding and participation in lessons and extra-curricular sport is exceptionally high.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning of subject

The quality of teaching and learning is outstanding.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning of subject

 Teaching is well planned so groups of pupils with similar ability levels make at least good progress and achieve well.  Learning is highly effective because teachers and coaches set high expectations and share exceptionally good relationships with pupils, consequently pupils behave very well and respond positively in lessons.  Teaching in GCSE PE is exceptionally good, pupils work independently for extended periods of time and produce high quality coursework.  Assessment procedures in Key Stage 3 help pupils to understand what National Curriculum level they are working at and what they need to do to improve. Procedures are less well developed in Key stage 4.

p.2

Quality of the curriculum

 Pupils exceed the PESSCL target for a minimum of two hours PE and sport in Key Stage 3. The majority of pupils in Key Stage 4 participate in more than two hours of curriculum and enrichment activities but the school does not maintain an accurate record of this.  An outstanding programme of extra-curricular sport accommodates large numbers of pupils and generates exceptionally high levels of performance.  Opportunities for vocational learning in sport, including leadership for 14 to 19 year olds are insufficient.

p.2

Leadership and management of subject

Leadership and management are outstanding.

p.2

Leadership and management of subject

 Excellent leadership by a director of sport and a head of PE has developed a highly effective team of teachers and coaches who share a corporate willingness to provide the very best opportunities for young people.  Outstanding management of coaches deployed within and beyond the curriculum contributes directly to the high standards achieved in rugby and gymnastics.  Self evaluation is accurate but its links with the department’s improvement plan are not clearly defined.

p.2

The impact of the PESSCL national strategy

The PESSCL national strategy is having a good impact on improving the quality of provision in PE and school sport in the family of primary schools but is having minimal impact on provision in this school.

p.3

The impact of the PESSCL national strategy

 The SSCo assigned to Robert Clack school for two days per week is enhancing PE and sport in primary feeder schools by improving the PE curriculum and engaging more sports coaches and parents to help develop after-school sports clubs.  The school has not maximised the potential of the school sports partnership or the local sports college to complement and enhance existing provision.  Partnership working is excellent but limited use is made of the PESSCL strategy to enhance provision.

p.3

Inclusion

The majority of pupils make very good progress in PE.

p.3

Inclusion

 Those with specific needs are identified early and given additional support in lessons from teaching assistants and additional teachers.  Many pupils who have learning difficulties or disabilities or a statement of special educational need have full access to the PE curriculum and many represent the school in competitive sport.  Pupils from minority ethnic backgrounds are fully integrated into PE and extra curricular sport.  More able pupils, including those identified as gifted and talented excel in a range of team games and gymnastics.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 increase the opportunities for vocational learning in sport, including leadership for 14 to 19 year olds  ensure that the areas for development identified through the department’s self-evaluation are prioritised in the subject development plan.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop PE and sport in the school. As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion