Other · Ofsted report
Setting
Summary
What we read, and from where
Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.
- Inspectorssingle source
Susan Bowles
- Postcode verified
YO60 7QB
Deep dive
What this report says
In plain English
Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.
Tone of the report
How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.
In line with other reports of this type.
How the report reads, start to finish
Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.
Strengths
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Concerns
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
Next steps
Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.
- I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop English in the school. p.3
- As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority/Local Learning Skills Council. p.3
- All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term and made available to the team for the next institutional inspection. p.3
What the report dwells on
Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.
SEND & inclusion2
“The provision for inclusion is satisfactory.” p.3
Anatomy of the report
How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.
- Pages
- 4
- Words of findings
- 727
- shorter than usual (typical 1049)
- Reading level
- Hard
- Flesch 44, typical 45
- Average sentence
- 17 words
- Next steps
- 3
- typical 5
- Hedged sentences
- 9%
- “some”, “not always”, “most”…
Where the words go
Full report text
Mrs S Magin Headteacher Foston Church of England Voluntary Controlled Primary School Foston York North Yorkshire YO60 7QB
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme - English
Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff, during my visit on 17 January 2007 to look at work in English.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme - English
As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at key areas of the subject the visit had a particular focus on our current survey theme: provision for poetry. The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text.
p.1
Ofsted survey inspection programme - English
The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of relevant documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of two lessons. The overall effectiveness of English was judged to be satisfactory.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Overall standards and achievement in English are satisfactory.
p.1
Achievement and standards
Results in national tests have, over the years, been above the national average, though they have dipped in the past two years. For the pupils in this school, this represents progress which is in line with expectations. Because standards of writing are weaker than their reading, the pupils have rarely reached the highest levels of attainment. Inspection evidence confirmed that pupils make appropriate progress in reading. Recently, key features of writing show signs of improvement. Pupils in the younger class use phonic knowledge to help them spell. They handwrite clearly, grasp the purpose of punctuation and have a developing sense of how to structure their Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk writing for a purpose. Older pupils adapt the structure and language of their writing to different purposes with growing confidence. Pupils enjoy many of their lessons, and take pride in their work. Older
p.1
Achievement and standards
pupils are beginning to work independently as a result of effective teaching.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning of English
Teaching and learning are satisfactory with several good features.
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning of English
Strengths include very good relationships with pupils and a focus on encouraging independent learning. Successful differentiation engages pupils at all stages of development in challenging tasks, and varied and interesting activities, resources and approaches give pupils chances to talk and think before they write or speak. Weaker features observed include activities not broken down into simple steps of learning; lack of clear guidance for pupils about what counts as success; and less effective involvement of pupils in speaking and listening as a preparation for writing. The use of assessment to help plan teaching and learning is developing well. Good examples were seen of staff checking that pupils have understood before moving on, successfully involving older pupils in reviewing their work, and making clear in their planning and marking what has been achieved and what needs to be done next. Pupils’ work
p.2
Quality of teaching and learning of English
is analysed to inform teaching plans; they have been set appropriate targets for writing and these are being monitored. A new recording system for English is at an early stage of use. Currently teachers do not record assessments of speaking and listening.
p.2
Quality of curriculum
It provides a suitable balance of reading and writing activities which reflect pupils’ interests and develop their skills progressively. Teachers provide stimulating activities – such as observing a rabbit – to encourage discussion and writing.
p.2
Leadership and management of English
Leadership and management of English are satisfactory, with some significant strengths.
p.2
Leadership and management of English
Action to improve writing since the previous inspection was initially slow but has accelerated with the appointment of an experienced and proactive literacy coordinator who models good practice. An appropriate action plan is being implemented and good practice is being shared across the team. A system to record assessment and track progress is being introduced. There has so far been little use of other approaches to help assure the quality of English teaching, such as peer observation.
p.2
Provision for poetry
Pupils experience a good range of poetry. Younger pupils play games with rhyming and rhythmical poems. Pupils progress to investigating more challenging poems which use sustained metaphors. Boys and girls are enthusiastic about poetry. Some engaging teaching approaches lead pupils to understand the craft of poetry writing and when well planned activities stir their imaginations, they stretch their use of language to a higher level. They have regular opportunities to write their own poems, and sometimes enter competitions.
p.3
Inclusion
The provision for inclusion is satisfactory.
p.3
Inclusion
Pupils with learning difficulties or disabilities make progress in line with expectations, because the school recognises and plans carefully for pupils’ individual needs from an early stage. Recently, the use of strategies which promote independent learning has had a positive impact on the motivation, behaviour and progress of some vulnerable pupils.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
raise standards of writing develop consistent ways of recording assessment and tracking progress find ways of evaluating and developing the effectiveness of teaching in English.
p.3
Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:
I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop English in the school. As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority/Local Learning Skills Council. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term and made available to the team for the next institutional inspection.
p.3
Discuss this inspection
Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.
Join the discussion