Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 14 Sept 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Name on report verified

    ANNUAL ASSESSMENT VISIT: MAIN FINDINGS

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+20Mostly positivemore positive than 35% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praisestrengtheffectiveoutstandingeffectivelyclearimproving
Criticisminadequateconcerningdeclinedelayedbelow

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

Findings positive critical

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No next steps set out.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
899
about usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 38, typical 45
Average sentence
19 words
Next steps
0
typical 5
Hedged sentences
2%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 100%

Full report text

Date of visit: 11 July 2007

This feedback contains brief findings from the annual assessment visit. It focuses on the themes explored during the visit and does not attempt to give a comprehensive overview of the college’s performance.

p.1

How well do learners achieve?

 Inspections of Lincoln College and Newark and Sherwood College in 2006/07 considered achievement and standards for the two colleges separately. Following the merger on 1 January 2007, the college has now merged its data concerning learners’ achievements in 2005/06.  The overall college success rate for long courses in 2005/06 was similar to the national average.  Success rates for 16-18 year old learners in 2005/06 were similar to the national average at level 1, significantly above the national average at level 2 and slightly above the national average at level 3. These comparisons are based on the national averages for 2004/05.  Success rates for adults in 2005/06 were significantly below the national average at level 1 and significantly above the national averages at levels 2 and 3. These comparisons are based on the national averages for 2004/05.  The overall proportion of learners retained on programmes in 2006/07 is

p.1

How well do learners achieve?

slightly higher than in 2005/06. Particular improvements have been noted in the proportion of adults retained on level 1 and level 3 programmes. There has, however, been a decline in the proportion of students aged 16- 18 year retained on level 2 programmes.

p.1

teaching and learning? What has been the impact of these actions?

 The inspection report for Lincoln College identified good teaching and learning as a key strength. The report for Newark and Sherwood College noted a key strength regarding effective measures to improve the quality of teaching and learning, but the accuracy of the internal assessment of the quality of teaching and learning was a key area for improvement.  The merged college now uses the observation of teaching and learning arrangements previously employed by Lincoln College. All teaching staff are observed annually by a team of trained and experienced observers. Observations include lessons and group tutorials, and encompass reviews of schemes of work and session plans. The observation team undertake a standardisation procedure prior to each period of observations. External moderation of observations take place as part of a peer review process involving Lincoln College and several other colleges. Observation records

p.1

teaching and learning? What has been the impact of these actions?

are also reviewed by senior managers and the quality team, who produce summary reports about teaching and learning to inform self-assessment and staff development.  Staff whose lessons are judged to be outstanding are encouraged to share good practice through the individual performance review process and by participating in professional development activities. Good practice is also shared through peer observations within curriculum areas. Staff whose lessons are judged to be inadequate are provided with support from a teaching and learning mentor.  The college has focused staff development in teaching and learning on the issues identified during the inspections in 2006/07. These include promoting the more effective use of integrated learning technology (ILT), the importance of active learning and the use of assessment to plan learning and review progress.  It is difficult to compare the overall quality of teaching and learning in

p.2

teaching and learning? What has been the impact of these actions?

2006/07 with that in previous years because of the merger of two colleges using different systems. College data suggests, however, that improvements have been made, particularly with respect to the quality of learning in lessons.

p.2

provision for, additional learning needs?

 The inspections in 2006/07 judged the support for learners to be a key strength of both colleges.  The identification of, and provision for, additional learning needs remains a strength of the merged college and has been enhanced during 2006/07. Improvements, through sharing good practice, have been made in the assessment of individual needs of learners prior to joining the college and in the effectiveness of transition planning for those with learning difficulties and/or disabilities. In addition, learning support workshops are to be introduced in September 2007 to provide drop-in facilities to help learners further develop their literacy and numeracy skills.  Individual learning plans for additional support are reviewed regularly and provide the college with information about the progress made by learners. Success rates on courses that receive additional support are generally higher than for the college as a whole and when compared to national

p.2

provision for, additional learning needs?

averages. Internal progression between different levels is also good, particularly from entry level to level 1. The college recognises that better use could be made of assessment data to monitor more effectively the benefits of additional learning support.

p.3

plan?

 The post-inspection action plan, including issues identified in the inspections of both colleges prior to merger, was approved by the college standards committee in March 2007. The plan makes clear reference to self-assessment and inspection reports, and forms part of the annual quality improvement cycle in 2006/07.  The college has comprehensive self-assessment and quality improvement arrangements. Good use has been made of peer review processes with other further education colleges to validate judgements in the self- assessment report and to consider the appropriateness of the post- inspection action plan.  Effective use has been made of individual performance reviews for all staff to drive forward actions in the post-inspection action plan, with a particular focus on improving success rates across all programmes.  Progress against the post-inspection action plan was reviewed in May 2007. Progress is generally good, facilitated by the sharing of good

p.3

plan?

practice, although some actions have been delayed slightly by an ongoing reorganisation of staff in the college.

p.3

plan?

information quoted is reproduced verbatim without adaptation, and the source and date of publication are stated. Inspection reports are available on the Ofsted website (www.ofsted.gov.uk).

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion