Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 1 Jun 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Lynn Bappa

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Lynn Bappa

  • Postcode verified

    NW8 6PX

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+93Very positivemore positive than 96% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseoutstandingmake good progressenjoyexcellenteffectivelyvery wellconfidentclearly

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsAbout the inspectionLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings449w+92
  • Leadership116w+75
  • What needs to improve115w0

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
663
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 48, typical 45
Average sentence
18 words
Next steps
3
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 55%Leadership 14%What needs to improve 14%About the inspection 17%

Full report text

Ms Jessica Bailey Acting Headteacher Robinsfield Infant School Ordnance Hill St Johns Wood London NW8 6PX

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

Thank you for making my visit on the 06 October so enjoyable and informative. As outlined in my initial letter, as well as looking at work in history, the visit had a particular focus on literacy in history.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

The evidence used to inform the judgements made included: interviews with staff and pupils, scrutiny of documentation, analysis of pupils’ work and observation of four parts of lessons.

p.1

Ofsted survey inspection programme – history

The overall effectiveness of history in your school was judged to be good with some outstanding features.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 Standards in history are above average and pupils make good progress. Pupils are confident learners who enjoy their history lessons. The standard of Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6644 www.ofsted.gov.uk written work in Year 2 is above average, as is the quality of pupils’ knowledge and understanding when they are interviewed.  Written work is well presented, with older pupils beginning to write at length and in different forms. I was particularly impressed with the class books on various history topics that are written by the pupils. By Year 2, pupils show a growing understanding of change over time and about how to study history. All pupils show a good recall of earlier work and Year 2 learners are clearly well prepared for work at Key Stage 2.

p.1

Quality of teaching and learning

The quality of teaching and learning is good.

p.2

Quality of teaching and learning

 Pupils enjoy learning because they have a lot of fun, excitement and practical activities in lessons. Group activities and open questioning engage the pupils effectively and ensure that they make good progress. Marking is good, because teachers show pupils exactly what they have done well and what they need to do to improve their work.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

The quality of the curriculum is good with some outstanding features.

p.2

Quality of curriculum

 The scheme of work is clear and the curriculum meets statutory requirements. Displays of pupils’ work and other materials are good and enhance the quality of pupils’ learning. There is a very good focus on developing pupils’ writing skills and this is having a positive impact on standards in history.  Excellent use is made of role play, visitors and other creative work to support the children in the learning of history. A particularly outstanding example of this creativity was seen during the inspection when a visiting dancer came in to demonstrate the Lindy Hop to pupils in Year 2 as part of Black History Month.  We discussed ideas about how the curriculum might change to ensure that it remains relevant to pupils as citizens in 2006 and beyond. We talked about the possibility of establishing a bridging unit with the feeder junior school and about ways to embed the study of history more explicitly in the Foundation

p.2

Leadership and management

 The new subject leader has made a good start to her new job but would benefit from further training in self evaluation.  Resources have been very well developed and displays and the use of artefacts are enhancing learning well. The school has identified both the strengths and areas for development well.

p.3

Focus: Literacy in history

 This is good. There are very good opportunities for pupils to write at different lengths and for different purposes. I have already mentioned the class books written by pupils on topics such as Bessie Coleman and Victorian schools.  Pupils clearly enjoy writing and are very proud of their efforts. Standards in writing are above average at the end of Year 2.

p.3

Inclusion

 Pupils with learning difficulties and disabilities, as well as those with English as an additional language, are well supported and the school has a warm and welcoming atmosphere. It encourages pupils to grow as individuals by ensuring that they take part in an exciting range of activities. The rich cultural diversity within the school is celebrated effectively in history lessons.

p.3

Areas for improvement

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, include the need to:

p.3

Areas for improvement

 further develop the already good curriculum through exploring the possibility of establishing a bridging unit with the feeder junior school  embed history topics more explicitly in the Foundation Stage curriculum, particularly in the Nursery class  provide further training for the new subject leader, particularly in monitoring and evaluation. I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop history in your school.

p.3

Areas for improvement

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your local authority and will be published on Ofsted’s website. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.4

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion