Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 1 Jun 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Lindsay Hebditch

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Lindsay Hebditch

  • Postcode verified

    IP4 1LT

Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+85Very positivemore positive than 88% of reports of this type

Reads more warmly than most reports of this type.

Praiseexcellenteffectiveexcellent relationshipsextremelyhigh qualityambitiousimprovedpositively
Criticismnot clearnot yetnot effective

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

FindingsWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings614w+92
  • What needs to improve225w+15

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
3
Words of findings
829
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 43, typical 45
Average sentence
21 words
Next steps
6
typical 5
Hedged sentences
3%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 73%What needs to improve 27%

Full report text

Professor Dave Muller Principal Suffolk College Rope Walk Ipswich Suffolk IP4 1LT

p.1

vocational work, including preparation for the specialised 14-19

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation during my visit on 08 November 2006. I am particularly grateful for all of the hard work which went in to preparing the programme and background documentation. Please pass on my thanks to all of the staff who gave up their time to talk to me.

p.1

vocational work, including preparation for the specialised 14-19

The visit provided much useful evidence for the good practice survey into CoVEs’ work with schools. Where published reports cite specific aspects of good practice it is usual practice to name the colleges involved. However, where reports identify common issues which represent barriers to progress, individual colleges will not be named.

p.1

vocational work, including preparation for the specialised 14-19

I agreed to provide a summary of my observations of good practice seen and to suggest some areas for development.

p.1

How well do learners achieve?

 Schools report improved attendance and better motivation of students who attend the college. Individual programmes have not been running long enough to assess the impact on the standards they reach.

p.1

How effective are teaching, training and learning?

 Teaching, training and learning are good. Students respond positively to their work at the college. They find their studies both interesting and Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk challenging. Student progress is monitored carefully and procedures for reporting progress to schools, parents and the students themselves are comprehensive. The college’s programme of lesson observations provides an effective check on the continuing quality of teaching in the CoVE. Partnership schools are also fully involved in the procedures for assessing and monitoring the quality of teaching.  CoVE funding has assisted in the development of excellent resources to support learning. These include the development of a full training nursery, providing early years students with the opportunity to strengthen their practice skills. The CoVE has recently purchased a VLE for health and

p.1

How effective are teaching, training and learning?

social care and early years to support the delivery of specialised units.

p.2

interests of learners?

 Current 14-16 programmes provide students with excellent opportunities to progress, and in the north east partnership provide an extremely effective platform for the planned introduction of the specialised diploma.  The north east Ipswich partnership currently caters for a group of Year 10 students on a two year ESF funded pre-apprenticeship programme in the health line of learning, which has been developed as a forerunner for the specialised diploma in society, health and development. The programme is being used to model diploma delivery at level 1 and level 2 to prepare the ground for the launch of the diploma in 2008. This is an excellent example of thorough preparation for the specialised diploma because the course is fit for purpose, provides clear progression pathways (including into HE) and is supported by the excellent resources in the CoVE. The current pre- apprenticeship group will be well prepared to take the diploma at level 3.

p.2

achievement and supporting all learners?

 A good track record of collaboration and the influence of the CoVE make the north east Ipswich partnership well placed to deliver specialised diplomas. There are excellent relationships between the four schools and the college and curriculum pathways are already in place.  Delivery of the diploma will take place in a community location for students at both level 2 and level 3. The CoVE will be responsible for delivering and managing the specialist units for childcare and health and social care. The advantages are that secure quality assurance arrangements are already in place, the partnership will be able to maximise the potential of its resources, and be able to respond to any significant changes in recruitment. It is intended that this model will ease timetabling issues and enable employers to become involved in the planning and delivery of the diploma.

p.2

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

 the two partnerships are at very different stages of development for the introduction of specialised diplomas. It is not clear how students’ entitlement to an appropriate range of high quality programmes will be assured given these differences. The more ambitious proposals in the south west are not supported by the effective history of collaborative planning and activity which exists in the north east, where the CoVE is playing a full and active role in curriculum developments  the provision of impartial information, advice and guidance to students is addressed in the plan for the north east partnership and is correctly identified as a priority for development  employers are not yet involved as fully as they might be in diploma developments.

p.3

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

Based on this visit it appears that CoVEs can and do have a real impact on specialised diploma developments where the collaborative arrangements are secure enough to take advantage of them.

p.3

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop the ways in which your CoVE supports 14-19 curriculum development in the area.

p.3

Areas for development, which we discussed, included:

As I explained in my previous letter, a copy of this letter will be sent to your LLSC and will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of the half-term following the visit. It will also be available to the team for your next institutional inspection.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion