Skip to content

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Other · Ofsted report

Setting

Inspected — · published 1 Jun 2007

Help us get it right

Sign in (free) to send feedback, so we can tell you when it's fixed.

Original PDF ↗

Summary

No overall grade in this framework

Les Brewer

What we read, and from where

Click a reading to see it highlighted in the report.

  • Inspectorssingle source

    Les Brewer

Page 1 of 4
Page 1 of the report

Deep dive

What this report says

In plain English

Join free to get a short, plain-English summary of any report.

Tone of the report

How positive or critical the inspectors' language is, from the words they chose. No AI involved.

+54Positivemore positive than 53% of reports of this type

In line with other reports of this type.

Praiseenjoymenteffectivevery highhigh qualityindependentclearclearly
Criticismlacknot effectively

How the report reads, start to finish

Every paragraph in order, sized by length. Tap one to see it on the page.

About the inspectionFindingsLeadershipWhat needs to improve positive critical
  • Findings434w+71
  • Leadership137w+33
  • What needs to improve80w−25

Strengths

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

Concerns

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

No strong criticism found.

Next steps

Quoted from the report. Tap to see it on the page.

What the report dwells on

Topics by how often they come up, coloured by how they are described. Open one for an example.

Anatomy of the report

How the report is built, against others of the same type and grade.

Pages
4
Words of findings
626
shorter than usual (typical 1049)
Reading level
Hard
Flesch 42, typical 45
Average sentence
17 words
Next steps
2
typical 5
Hedged sentences
0%
“some”, “not always”, “most”…

Where the words go

Findings 56%Leadership 18%What needs to improve 10%About the inspection 16%

Full report text

Ofsted survey of the Young Apprenticeships programme: 2006 /07

Thank you for your hospitality and co-operation, and that of your staff and pupils, during my visit on 08 December 2006 to look at work in the Young Apprenticeships programme.

p.1

Ofsted survey of the Young Apprenticeships programme: 2006 /07

The visit provided valuable information which will contribute to our national evaluation and reporting. Published reports are likely to list the names of the contributing institutions, but individual institutions will not be identified in the main text. All feedback letters will be published on the Ofsted website at the end of each half-term.

p.1

Ofsted survey of the Young Apprenticeships programme: 2006 /07

I undertook to provide a brief written version of the main points made in my feedback at the end of the visit, to support development of the partnership. This follows.

p.1

Ofsted survey of the Young Apprenticeships programme: 2006 /07

The overall effectiveness of the Boston Young Apprenticeships (YA) Partnership was judged to be good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

Achievement and standards overall are good.

p.1

Achievement and standards

 All pupils are working towards vocationally relevant qualifications at level 2 in hairdressing and preparation for employment. Alexandra House 33 Kingsway London WC2B 6SE T 08456 404045 F 020 7421 6855 www.ofsted.gov.uk

p.1

Achievement and standards

Ms C George Boston YA Programme Manager Boston College Skirbeck Road Boston Lincolnshire PE21 6JF  Standards of practical skill displayed by pupils are good and above that expected for their time on the programme. Assignments and tests indicate a good grasp of underpinning knowledge and understanding.

p.1

Achievement and standards

The pupils’ personal development and well being are good.

p.2

Achievement and standards

 Attendance is very high at 94% and pupils express enjoyment in the programme.  Pupils behave in a mature manner with teamwork and peer support being observed.  Pupils display good levels of professional standards that include adherence to health and safety.  Independent learning is being developed and encouraged through a series of tasks that require pupils to gather evidence from several sources and present it in the form of an assignment.

p.2

Quality of provision

 The teaching in the college and training provider is coordinated to help develop professional and commercial hairdressing standards amongst the pupils.  Pupils show and express a high level of enjoyment, interest and motivation in their lessons.  Assessment of pupils is thorough and includes constructive feedback on how pupils can improve.

p.2

Quality of provision

 Work experience is planned for term two. Initial sheltered experience is being given in term one via assisting full-time students at college to build up confidence and ability prior to planned external placements taking place.  The programme is made up of complementary parts delivered by college and training provider and working towards achievement of a level 2 in hairdressing. Enrichment activities include working towards a level 2 qualification in preparation for employment and visits to Salon International that help develop pupils’ understanding of working requirements and standards in hairdressing.  School and college timetables have been adjusted to ensure pupils can still access the core curriculum and spend two days on the YA programme. The programme requirements of two days per week YA allocation and fifty days work experience are built in. Care guidance and support are good.

p.2

Quality of provision

 Individual learning plans (ILPS) are clear and used by staff and pupils to monitor personal progress but do not link effectively with tracking of vocational progress.  Information about the programme for pupils and parents was of high quality and a good range of progression routes at 16 is available.  Procedures for monitoring attendance and behaviour are effective.  Pupils receive good one to one support and guidance within lessons.

p.3

Leadership and management

 Good support has come from the sector skills council (SSC) who have also been involved in the selection procedure and providing teaching materials.  An effective partnership agreement has been developed through the college’s experiences with the increased flexibility programme. Schools are aware of the calibre of pupils needed and involvement with parents is from day one.  Management of the programme and policies is shared between the college, schools and training provider. Partners meet twice per term with SSC, employers and school representatives to discuss operational issues relating to individual pupil progress.  Focused forum meetings take place termly to deal with strategic issues relating to cohort progress and performance, recruitment, selection and induction and planning of new cohort delivery.  No evidence was available on how the partnership is attempting to reduce gender stereotyping.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

 lack of evidence to support development of key skills  linking ILPs to tracking of progress in portfolios  show clearly how learning is being checked in lessons  consider strategies to address gender imbalance.

p.3

Areas for improvement, which we discussed, included:

I hope these observations are useful as you continue to develop your Young Apprenticeships programme. As explained in my previous letter, a copy of this feedback will be sent to Lincolnshire LA, Lincolnshire and Rutland LLSC and will be published on the Ofsted web-site.

p.3

Discuss this inspection

Members compare notes on inspectors and inspections here. Join free to read and post.

Join the discussion